On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Dieter Plaetinck <dieter@plaetinck.be> wrote:
On Sun, 15 May 2011 11:09:02 -0500 Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com> wrote: Hi Dan,
since you seem to think it is so trivial to implement- I actually said the exact opposite. Maybe you should read what I said first. I'll eat crow here on this one, I apologize. Looking back at it, I missed your "I understand this is probably hard to fix, on the other hand" line. Sorry about that.
Pierre clearly stated why we aren't able to do this at this time He only referred to a prior discussion which I could not find back, so I asked for the link.
being told our work isn't good enough really sucks the fun out of it. (blah blah blah) Not to sound like an ass,
putting words I didn't say in my mouth and flaming me does make you sound like one.
I guess it can sometimes be hard to interpret the intention behind my (or anyone elses) e-mails, which can have caused a misunderstanding. Either way bad-mouthing anyone was not my intention. I think it just comes down to an attitude misunderstanding, so I apologize. I got a bit worked up when your email ended with "which makes my job harder", which just rubs me the wrong way- we all do work around here, and saying that makes it sound like it isn't focused correctly in your eyes as it isn't doing enough to serve your purposes.
I will make sure I fully read your emails from here on out and not interpret them as carrying malicious intent, but I do also encourage you to watch the way you put things- it can come across as very demeaning of other peoples efforts. -Dan