18 Jun
2012
18 Jun
'12
7:01 p.m.
Am 18.06.2012 20:57, schrieb Tom Gundersen:
Presumably, pacman won't be needed immediately on boot, so to appear a bit more "snappy" i guess it would make sense to do the pacman-init in the background.
This would obviously only work if there is some lock in place to make pacman wait on pacman-init to finish in a graceful way. Is this the case?
I am not sure if this would be worth the possible trouble. In my vm this script finished in less than 1s. -- Pierre Schmitz, https://pierre-schmitz.com