19 Feb
2010
19 Feb
'10
11:08 a.m.
Am Fri, 19 Feb 2010 09:23:06 +0100 schrieb Dieter Plaetinck <dieter@plaetinck.be>:
hmm. you lost me. why would we want this? isn't the point of creating dual arch images that you do not need separate arch-specific iso's anymore?
When reading this thread for a while I'm asking myself, what's wrong with the separate arch-specific iso's. I mean the user has to choose which arch he wants to install anyway. Are arch-specific iso's not more KISS? Greetings, Heiko