[arch-releng] Christmas Release?
I am not sure what happened in AIF, but archiso has seen some improvements. Should we push out a Christmas Release with the latest stuff? Once the pacman 4/signing stuff is finished and in core, tweaks to AIF will be needed which will probably delay another release, so better do one now, before that happens. What do you guys think?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 12/15/2011 01:09 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
I am not sure what happened in AIF, but archiso has seen some improvements. Should we push out a Christmas Release with the latest stuff?
Once the pacman 4/signing stuff is finished and in core, tweaks to AIF will be needed which will probably delay another release, so better do one now, before that happens.
What do you guys think?
Sounds reasonable to me. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJO6TsXAAoJEDnkuHfmLrkVdGcQAM9ysxwK+FSbiEcdJzFDKYwa y9IxYwOUoaGiieNa/0xwVjECi1KCwLL8b5+frsuMKAZ+rZ1bglapP+cevhzgPXUA h7ju5hi5nB9h4yydd9j/FjfOxceW3XpSoFBm4jxKuSSLh3m2f29X/qx3SPVF5Owd zZ5jMa/Zg4IGNiDtvKu+O5S7A8tGETP5HjfCRW9MmsxdfkSwagkRxOodVK5KBJkB ZLkvDDrInFlp299hzaGZkNtmFDDBxNWPKvRymDxcwqgdoRVT8QsNDpI9OeY+gaKj aYosMg1d5DQqTU8ZDbB69FT5+FaTjw5ZLdaQJJcQLTh1cmfDvYwVsnEnfnJ/X2Um 0y7oPlzPrIfim/Q5b+Mw3AgJhMArXOjo5YabjQp/8uuUVKcWtMnwHzkuowawrOYJ Aij74NY8YAB6cOVTk6eCUsXXfCjVhJDAywAhXocxQ/WFLr5GY444kaVP3IYsaMTn 0BjEbL+3d0vc5SQxtlahqWierZTFXMPC9WW3meD7Dsh2HvMjL0QD+l59jt0WVBdy zrK7ipQVjrampfJXEBNyBdeOhIs8oVXlxAdBJD3morLs0yvVFw4s+nUp20Oar9sz wDNXfJr2gXwFoxHVyEfXYhpvK8JFGvyo2JWpH4h2X7ubu+NyIilEeLtMEr0FfNjP p2wR5LI81Omp5DRuZURp =Epv3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On 12/14/2011 09:09 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
I am not sure what happened in AIF, but archiso has seen some improvements. Should we push out a Christmas Release with the latest stuff?
Once the pacman 4/signing stuff is finished and in core, tweaks to AIF will be needed which will probably delay another release, so better do one now, before that happens.
What do you guys think?
Sounds good. At least we have two major features from end-user-pov in archiso: persistence and http/nfs in pxe (plus much more pxe-easy-setup) -- Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi \cos^2\alpha + \sin^2\alpha = 1
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 23:09:22 -0300 Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi <vmlinuz386@yahoo.com.ar> wrote:
On 12/14/2011 09:09 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
I am not sure what happened in AIF, but archiso has seen some improvements. Should we push out a Christmas Release with the latest stuff?
Once the pacman 4/signing stuff is finished and in core, tweaks to AIF will be needed which will probably delay another release, so better do one now, before that happens.
What do you guys think?
Sounds good. At least we have two major features from end-user-pov in archiso: persistence and http/nfs in pxe (plus much more pxe-easy-setup)
I thought the signing stuff is getting close now? I would just do one new release that brings all archiso improvements along with a few aif fixes and the signing stuff. as for what's on the plate for AIF, check out: https://bugs.archlinux.org/index.php?do=index&project=6&status[]=open esp. the things labeled critical and high should be taken care of. also, what needs to be first? pacman4/signing stuff in core, or new release? i thought we needed an archiso release with the signing stuff enabled before we could move pacman4/signing stuff to core. but i'm not sure why. Dieter
Am 15.12.2011 11:26, schrieb Dieter Plaetinck:
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 23:09:22 -0300 Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi <vmlinuz386@yahoo.com.ar> wrote:
On 12/14/2011 09:09 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
I am not sure what happened in AIF, but archiso has seen some improvements. Should we push out a Christmas Release with the latest stuff?
Once the pacman 4/signing stuff is finished and in core, tweaks to AIF will be needed which will probably delay another release, so better do one now, before that happens.
What do you guys think?
Sounds good. At least we have two major features from end-user-pov in archiso: persistence and http/nfs in pxe (plus much more pxe-easy-setup)
I thought the signing stuff is getting close now?
Exactly, but that's going to delay the next release.
I would just do one new release that brings all archiso improvements along with a few aif fixes and the signing stuff.
Doing yet another release directly after the signing stuff is done shouldn't be a problem. But if we hit problems and need to delay, we still have a fairly recent snapshot and can thus take our time.
as for what's on the plate for AIF, check out: https://bugs.archlinux.org/index.php?do=index&project=6&status[]=open esp. the things labeled critical and high should be taken care of.
Any regressions compared to the previous release?
also, what needs to be first? pacman4/signing stuff in core, or new release? i thought we needed an archiso release with the signing stuff enabled before we could move pacman4/signing stuff to core. but i'm not sure why.
Once pacman 4 goes to core, we need signing in archiso and AIF. The archiso part is rather easy (set up a keyring for the live environment), the AIF part is harder
On Thu, 15 Dec 2011 12:40:26 +0100 Thomas Bächler <thomas@archlinux.org> wrote:
Any regressions compared to the previous release?
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/26306 https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/26717
Once pacman 4 goes to core, we need signing in archiso and AIF. The archiso part is rather easy (set up a keyring for the live environment), the AIF part is harder
you think? we discussed this and it seemed pretty easy to me. see: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/27583
On Thu, 15 Dec 2011 12:43:38 +0100 Dieter Plaetinck <dieter@plaetinck.be> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Dec 2011 12:40:26 +0100 Thomas Bächler <thomas@archlinux.org> wrote:
Any regressions compared to the previous release?
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/26306 https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/26717
Once pacman 4 goes to core, we need signing in archiso and AIF. The archiso part is rather easy (set up a keyring for the live environment), the AIF part is harder
you think? we discussed this and it seemed pretty easy to me. see: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/27583
well, the regressions should be fixed. there are still a bunch of pending issues: https://bugs.archlinux.org/index.php?do=index&project=6&status[]=open at this point, you'll also see a bunch of blockdevices (/dev/dm* and /dev/loop* devices) which shouldn't appear, i'm still looking for a clean way to be able to filter those out. (maybe just match their name..) but you can already start testing testbuilds from http://releng.archlinux.org/isos/ please report feedback @ http://www.archlinux.org/releng/feedback/ Dieter
participants (4)
-
Dieter Plaetinck
-
Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
-
Sven-Hendrik Haase
-
Thomas Bächler