On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Heiko Baums <lists@baums-on-web.de> wrote:

Am Tue, 7 Dec 2010 09:35:29 -0600 schrieb C Anthony Risinger <anthony@extof.me>:

...

how about pulling btrfs-progs into core as well?  and on that note, where does btrfs stand in terms of AIF?

I'd like to see btrfs in [core] and AIF, too.

meant to change the subject on last message. i will post within a couple days the complete sub-root structure needed to support advanced features provided by the updated btrfs hook. if we can, at the minimum, install user systems into a dedicated subvolume, my life becomes 10x simpler, and i don't have to tell people... "great! the conversion process worked! now, go and `rm -rf` all the useless crap in the btrfs root that i cannot safely remove programatically due to a shortcoming in btrfs that has fallen on deaf ears the 5+ times i've brought it up to the list" :-) C Anthony