[arch-releng] [PATCH] ?Urgent? Use new kernel release format in releng
?URGENT? If the monthly Arch ISO releases are made using releng, the 2018.08.01 ISO being made in a few hours will fail. linux 4.17.11-1 [1], released 2 days ago, broke releng/build.sh The linux commit changed the format of the kernel release from "4.17.10-1-ARCH" to "4.17.11-arch1". With several files and lines being changed to affect this change in that commit, it appears intentional. releng/build.sh looks for usr/lib/modules/*-ARCH/modules.alias, so fails. [1] https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/commit/trunk? h=packages/linux&id=d0c4ab0716e0ae1fc058a83ccb02bde92885ced6 --- configs/releng/build.sh | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/configs/releng/build.sh b/configs/releng/build.sh index 180fa94..8e44ad6 100755 --- a/configs/releng/build.sh +++ b/configs/releng/build.sh @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ make_syslinux() { cp ${work_dir}/x86_64/airootfs/usr/lib/syslinux/bios/memdisk ${work_dir}/iso/${install_dir}/boot/syslinux mkdir -p ${work_dir}/iso/${install_dir}/boot/syslinux/hdt gzip -c -9 ${work_dir}/x86_64/airootfs/usr/share/hwdata/pci.ids > ${work_dir}/iso/${install_dir}/boot/syslinux/hdt/pciids.gz - gzip -c -9 ${work_dir}/x86_64/airootfs/usr/lib/modules/*-ARCH/modules.alias > ${work_dir}/iso/${install_dir}/boot/syslinux/hdt/modalias.gz + gzip -c -9 ${work_dir}/x86_64/airootfs/usr/lib/modules/*-arch*/modules.alias > ${work_dir}/iso/${install_dir}/boot/syslinux/hdt/modalias.gz } # Prepare /isolinux -- 2.18.0
On 07/31/2018 06:43 PM, james harvey via arch-releng wrote:
?URGENT? If the monthly Arch ISO releases are made using releng, the 2018.08.01 ISO being made in a few hours will fail.
linux 4.17.11-1 [1], released 2 days ago, broke releng/build.sh
The linux commit changed the format of the kernel release from "4.17.10-1-ARCH" to "4.17.11-arch1". With several files and lines being changed to affect this change in that commit, it appears intentional.
releng/build.sh looks for usr/lib/modules/*-ARCH/modules.alias, so fails. https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/59496
And can we please be less dramatic about this please? Anyway, the PKGBUILD may soon be reworked again, so let's wait and see. We should try to use a more stable fix than this regardless. -- Eli Schwartz Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
participants (2)
-
Eli Schwartz
-
james harvey