November 2010 - Aur-dev - lists.archlinux.org

Re: [aur-dev] Subject fail
by Martti Kühne 05 Nov '10

05 Nov '10

On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 7:46 PM, <aur-dev-request(a)archlinux.org> wrote: > Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 11:26:18 +0800 > From: Ng Oon-Ee <ngoonee(a)gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [aur-dev] aur-dev Digest, Vol 37, Issue 1 > To: aur-dev(a)archlinux.org > Message-ID: <1288754778.16898.1.camel(a)localhost.localdomain> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-9" > > > Please, please, please do not reply directly to digests. At the very > least change the title back so readers can know what the email is about. > > > Will take more care in the future. Thx for the hint. mar77i

1 0

[aur-dev] [PATCH] JSON: enable multiple arguments for "info" method
by tuxce 04 Nov '10

04 Nov '10

Hi, I read that aur is in maintenance mode, but I try anyway: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/17583 FS#17583 - JSON: enable multiple arguments for "info" method Patch also attached to bug report I tested it on current master git branch, it works. Thanks.

2 1

Re: [aur-dev] aur-dev Digest, Vol 37, Issue 1
by Martti Kühne 03 Nov '10

03 Nov '10

>> this is still irritating, and also users who have non-white >> background colors will be confused by the current layout. > > Can you explain that? I'm not really sure what you mean about non-white > backgrounds. > I have some gray shading in my browser's settings, which are, I admit it, somehow on purpose, but all the other archlinux.org pages look fine. aur.archlinux.org just looks like this: http://img5.imagebanana.com/img/rppigp0x/aurnonwhitebackground.jpg it's a 23 bytes update, so, I believe this is bearable :) ... imagine people who have a black-on-white layout there. keep up the greatest repo ever! Actually, I've learned a bit of ruby, LD_PRELOAD hacks and more from it... :-D cheers!

3 2

[aur-dev] incorrect info in some old database entries?
by Christopher Brannon 02 Nov '10

02 Nov '10

Hello, I'm looking at two bug reports: <https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/15308> and <https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/19327>. The latter is a duplicate of the former. Apparently, URLpath is incorrect for several packages in the Packages table. Would someone with access to the AUR database mind running the attached Python script? It'll produce a file named bad_pkgs.txt, which I want to see. -- Chris

1 0