[aur-dev] Series of tupkg improvements.
Here comes a series of patches for tupkg, particularly tupkgupdate. One of the most recent patches actually broke tupkgupdate. I've tested these on my own mini community repo. Hah it's pretty exciting to begin to understand its quirky workings.
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 4:35 AM, Loui Chang <louipc.ist@gmail.com> wrote: Thanks for looking at this stuff, Loui. It needs some love. Suggestion- if you include your patches inline rather than attached, it is a lot easier for some of us to comment inline on them if we see things. -Dan
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 10:30 PM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 4:35 AM, Loui Chang <louipc.ist@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks for looking at this stuff, Loui. It needs some love.
Suggestion- if you include your patches inline rather than attached, it is a lot easier for some of us to comment inline on them if we see things.
Yeah. I use msmtp to send to gmail, and just configured git send-mail to use msmtp. Tada!
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:39:57AM -0600, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 10:30 PM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com> wrote:
Suggestion- if you include your patches inline rather than attached, it is a lot easier for some of us to comment inline on them if we see things.
Yeah. I use msmtp to send to gmail, and just configured git send-mail to use msmtp. Tada!
Ah I'll have to try that out sometime with esmtp. Msmtp was behaving badly on me awhile ago. I do like receiving patches as attachments though. Then they save as a nice descriptive name automatically. I wonder if there'd be a way to do both inline and a nice name.
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 1:39 PM, Loui Chang <louipc.ist@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:39:57AM -0600, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 10:30 PM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com> wrote:
Suggestion- if you include your patches inline rather than attached, it is a lot easier for some of us to comment inline on them if we see things.
Yeah. I use msmtp to send to gmail, and just configured git send-mail to use msmtp. Tada!
Ah I'll have to try that out sometime with esmtp. Msmtp was behaving badly on me awhile ago.
I do like receiving patches as attachments though. Then they save as a nice descriptive name automatically. I wonder if there'd be a way to do both inline and a nice name.
Can't you send it both inline and as an attachment?
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 02:05:47PM -0600, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 1:39 PM, Loui Chang <louipc.ist@gmail.com> wrote:
I do like receiving patches as attachments though. Then they save as a nice descriptive name automatically. I wonder if there'd be a way to do both inline and a nice name.
Can't you send it both inline and as an attachment?
Yeah I guess I could do that, though I'll aim to avoid sending double the data for the sake of convenience.
participants (3)
-
Aaron Griffin
-
Dan McGee
-
Loui Chang