Re: [aur-dev] Removing category field from AUR.
Hi Guys I only just joined this mailing list and I'm not sure that I can opt to receive past threads. Let's hope the server knows what to do with this email, which is a reply to earlier ones with the same subject. Loui Chang wrote:
In light of recent discussions I've been thinking of removing the category
data from AUR.
I agree completely: the 'category' feature is a major pain in the arse, as there aren't enough of them and I dislike being stalled by something so unessential when updating a package. Sebastian Nowicki wrote:
A much better alternative is to use a tag style system. The tags would be
defined by the PKGBUILD, so it's much more flexible, and a single package can have multiple tags. I changed categories to tags in AUR2.
This is a great idea, but perhaps make it optional for PKGBUILDs. If each must have at least one tag, rebellious package maintainers might add a line like: tags=('screw-tags'). Chris
On Sun, Apr 05, 2009 at 07:46:42PM +1000, Chris Giles wrote:
This is a great idea, but perhaps make it optional for PKGBUILDs. If each must have at least one tag, rebellious package maintainers might add a line like: tags=('screw-tags').
For sure. If implemented, tags would be totally optional.
participants (2)
-
Chris Giles
-
Loui Chang