Aur-general October 2009

aur-general@lists.archlinux.org

87 participants
99 discussions

[aur-general] Delete wxgtk-media (but wait for wxgtk-2.8.10.1-5)
by Dany Martineau 20 Oct '09

20 Oct '09

Hi! I read that mediactrl is now enabled in wxgtk-2.8.10.1-5 When this version appears in extra, could an admin delete wxgtk-media please? Thanks!! -- Dany Martineau Enseignant en mathématiques École secondaire du Harfang 4e et 5e secondaire http://danym.org CSSMI

2 1

[aur-general] should be esound an optdepends?
by Andrea Scarpino 20 Oct '09

20 Oct '09

>From FS#16502: With GNOME 2.28 arriving, it's time to make esound an optional package, which is currently not the case. Here is the list of the packages which requires esound. I think for all of them that esound should be an optional dependency (except maybe enlightenment?). * bmp * cinelerra-cv * enlightenment * epplet-base * freeciv * gmerlin * gstreamer0.10-good-plugins * kvirc * kvm * libgnome * qemu * vice * xine-lib * xmms What's our decision about this? -- Andrea `bash` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer

1 0

[aur-general] TU Vote: Angel Velásquez (angvp)
by Evangelos Foutras 20 Oct '09

20 Oct '09

Hi TUs, This begins the voting period for the addition of Angel Velásquez (angvp) as a TU, which will end in seven days. You can view his application at http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2009-October/006803.html Don't forget to vote (using the web interface)! Cheers.

1 1

Re: [aur-general] [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] List of packages that could be rebuilt if you have nothing better to do...
by Allan McRae 19 Oct '09

19 Oct '09

Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: > Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: > >> Allan McRae wrote: >> >> >>> Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Allan McRae wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I have created a list of packages the could use a rebuild but for >>>>> which there is no hurry. These include packages without the arch in >>>>> their filename, packages containing a .FILELIST file, packages with >>>>> man pages in /usr/man or uncompress man and info pages. See >>>>> http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/User:Allan/Unimportant_Rebuild_List >>>>> >>>>> Do people think this is useful and should I move it to the >>>>> DeveloperWiki? >>>>> >>>>> Allan >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Good job. >>>> >>>> And for "Packages that can be converted to arch=any" sometime ago I >>>> sended a list of tentative packages [#1]. Its old and some of listed >>>> packages [#2] are now "any" >>>> >>>> >>>> [#1] >>>> http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2009-July/005960.html >>>> [#2] http://archlinux.djgera.com.ar/misc/any.txt >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> I'm being lazy... any change you can easily generate an updated list >>> for [core]/[extra]? Don't worry about it if it will be a hassle. >>> >>> Allan >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> No problem, I can do a "light scan" making a difference between this >> list and list of current packages. >> I guess that doing again a "deep scan" don't make much sense, >> >> >> Good Luck! >> >> >> > List updated [#1] > > This is based on old list, deleting current converted packages and > packages deleted from repos. > No new packages are added because I didn't a deep/fine scan. For each repo. > > If any have a time, the idea to do the deep scan is (what I remember was > done manually in the past) > > 1) Download this db [#2]. > 2) Keep with 0 size files from db. -> packages names. > 3) Scan from previous result list if there are any ELF32/ELF64 LSB > (relocatables (objects files, kernel modules, ar archives, etc), > executables, shared objects) and discard ELF for others archs (for > example AVR, ARM, SPARC) inside each package. > > > [#1] http://archlinux.djgera.com.ar/misc/any-20091019.txt > [#2] http://archlinux.djgera.com.ar/pkgdyn/db-20091019.tar.bz2 > Thanks, I have added the [core] and [extra] packages to my wiki page. A TU probably wants to add this to the [community] TODO page (which needs a big update: http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Community_todo) Allan

1 0

[aur-general] nouveau-drm-snapshot
by Xavier 19 Oct '09

19 Oct '09

>From my comment in AUR : " But I am not sure this pkgbuild is needed after all. It does exactly the same as the one in extra : http://repos.archlinux.org/viewvc.cgi/nouveau-drm/repos/extra-i686/PKGBUILD… So it violates AUR guidelines :) " The new "web svn" location is : http://repos.archlinux.org/wsvn/packages/nouveau-drm/repos/extra-i686/PKGBU…

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion request: kernel-eeepc-901-kms
by Smith Dhumbumroong 18 Oct '09

18 Oct '09

Please delete kernel-eeepc-901-kms (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26393), as it have been replaced by kernel-eeepc-901 package in AUR.

2 2

[aur-general] Obsoleted, lacking developer wiki parts
by Laszlo Papp 17 Oct '09

17 Oct '09

Hello some obsoleted, laking part of the Developer Wiki! --- http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/DeveloperWiki:Adopting_Packages 1. Browse the *community* Trusted User Repository located at http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?L=3 (the link is not available anymore) 3. Retreive the PKGBUILDs for the new packages: CVSROOT=:pserver:anonymous@cvs.archlinux.org:/home/cvs-community and perform the testing/verificatoin on the PKGBUILD. Note that there is no need to change the version number unless changes are made to the package, this will minimize needless re-downloading. (CVS to SVN?) --- http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/DeveloperWiki:Sigurd_%28TU%29 <- empty presently (gerolde, gudrun is okay.) --- http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/DeveloperWiki:NewsletterSteps 1. Get most recent version of the newsletter: git clone ssh:// archlinux.org/srv/projects/git/newsletter.git/ <- I can't clone it. (Can the developers maybe do this action only?) --- Best Regards, Laszlo Papp

1 0

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: webkit-sharp
by Tim Yang 16 Oct '09

16 Oct '09

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion request: webkit-sharp
by tdy＠gmx.com 16 Oct '09

16 Oct '09

2 1

[aur-general] Filter packages by voted-status
by Lauri Niskanen 16 Oct '09

16 Oct '09

Hello, Is it possible to only show the packages I have voted for on the AUR web interface? If not could you please add that feature. It would make managing votes much easier. And who doesn't like to have easier control over things. -- Ape <Lauri Niskanen>

2 3

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Older →

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

Aur-general October 2009