On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 05:28, Sven Eckelmann <sven.eckelmann(a)gmx.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>> Note the comment about the yasm dependency. It appears this is a
>> hangover from older mupen64plus versions that did require it (my
>> bad...). When you rebuild to remove that, you will obviously need the
>> build fix patches from the Debian patch tracker (glibc2.10, as-needed)
>> and I would also include the ones to build against the system libraries.
> I would recommend to take patches from my git repo[3] as the patch tracker is
> (for unknown reasons) complete outdated.
>
> I think he meant following patches:
> * as-needed.patch
> * ftbfs-glibc210.patch
> * system-libbz2.patch
> * system-liblzma.patch
> * system-libpng.patch
> * system-zlib.patch
>
> Fixes of crashes and glitches:
> * fix-7z-subfolder.patch
> * fix_readpng.patch
> * gtk-open-filter.patch
> * jttl_fix_romclosed.patch
> * rice-screenflickering.patch
> * rice-texturepack-crash.patch
> * version-string.patch
>
> Experimental patches are:
> * xdg-basedir.patch
> * noexecstack.patch
>
> Mostly debian specific (or on architectures you don't support):
> * dejavu-font.patch
> * default-optimisations.patch
> * destdir.patch
> * fix-desktop-file.patch
> * ftbfs-kfreebsd.patch
> * ftbfs-dynarec.patch
> * debian-archs.patch
> * glide64-noasm.patch
> * plugin-searchpath.patch
> * remove-gln64.patch
> * remove-nondfsg-icons.patch
> * static-binutils-libs.patch
>
> Only debugger related (not activated on Arch)
> * ftbfs-debugger.patch
> * rice_nodebug.patch
>
> There is also a glitch which prevents the correctness of the pure interpreter
> (haven't checked yet the interpreter and recompiler) submitted upstream as bug
> 272. Maybe you have an idea for bug 51. I am digging a little bit around but
> without any real success - only got a hack which can be used to open the gate
> and then restart the game with a non-hacked version of mupen64plus.
>
> Before I forget: When you change the PKGBUILD - can you please change the
> maintainer field? I just send Allan McRae that mail because he was marked as
> maintainer of that package.
>
> Best regards,
> Sven
>
>> [3] http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/mupen64plus.git;a=tree;f=debian/patch…
>
I don't really know.. To be honest I don't actually use the software
actively, and I wouldn't know where to begin with selecting how/if it
should be patched. Maybe another TU would like to take over the
package from me?
Hi,
This script updates or inserts md5sum
just run this script in PKGBUILDs dir.
It works for my packages at least)
It is better than
makepkg -g >>PKGBUILD
because it inserts md5 just before build() function.
Hi,
rubyroom hasn't been updated (submitted) since 19 Nov 2008. I e-mailed the
maintainer almost two months ago and have not got any reply.
If the package is disowned, I can fix it. I have the PKGBUILD ready.
Thanks,
Alexander Rødseth
- wxcam ( http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15272 ): should be
orphaned. This package hasn't been updated since
August 2008. Some users posted updated PKGBUILDs in comments but didn't
got an answer.
Thank you.
Can someone orphan vuurmurr please?
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14619
Hasn't been updated for several versions. The current package
maintainer has 2 packages in the AUR, both out of date.