December 2010 - Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Gridflow outdated, no reply
by Bernardo Barros 24 Dec '10

24 Dec '10

This package is several versions outdated and the owner does do not respond: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19271

2 1

[aur-general] libxkbcommon-git & libxkbcommon(-git) - wooot?
by Det 24 Dec '10

24 Dec '10

Hellooooooooh, Please wipe out either libxkbcommon [1] or libxkbcommon-git [2] from the face of the AUR. These things are essentially the same package (since they both use git), which makes the other one redundant. 'libxkbcommon' was there first but it has the wrong naming scheme and not that many votes for it to really matter if it somehow was suddenly dematerialized(!). [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40796 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42556 Thaaanks, Det

2 1

[aur-general] deleted revengeofthetitans-hib
by widomaker2k7＠gmail.com 24 Dec '10

24 Dec '10

Hello, Please delete "revengeofthetitans-hib", it's of duplicite which http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37457 to remove : http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44694 thanks.

2 1

[aur-general] Orphan request
by Bartek Piotrowski 23 Dec '10

23 Dec '10

Following packages have been out-of-date for a some time now. Maintainers hasn't replied comments and emails in more than week. flush (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25114) bleachbit (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22499) gpick (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24975) muttng (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10892) wklej (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7811) - Maintainer answered, that he forgot password and request to orphan his packages and account, if you can. -- Bartek "Barthalion" Piotrowski

2 2

[aur-general] Please orphan earcandy
by Ng Oon-Ee 23 Dec '10

23 Dec '10

http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24059 Maintainer does not respond since Dec 9th

2 1

Re: [aur-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] rpcbind 0.2.0-3
by jwbirdsong 23 Dec '10

23 Dec '10

On 12/20/2010 11:40 AM, Andreas Radke wrote: > Minor fix: add missing man page for rpcinfo > https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/21271 > > Please sign off. > > -Andy > If you'll take user signoff... Signoff both arches

1 0

[aur-general] xmobar-darcs deletion request
by Cédric Girard 22 Dec '10

22 Dec '10

Hi, xmobar development has moved to git repository, thus xmobar-darcs [1] may be deleted as it has been replaced by xmobar-git [2] Please feel free to review the PKGBUILD for xmobar-git as well. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13627 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44683 Thanks, -- Cédric Girard

2 2

[aur-general] AUR/apache-maven removal?
by Guillaume ALAUX 22 Dec '10

22 Dec '10

Hi there, AUR/apache-maven [1] is: - out of date - orphan - duplicate of community/maven [2] [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36876 [2] http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/maven/ Let's make some room :) -- Guillaume

2 1

[aur-general] Duplicates
by Nathan Owens 22 Dec '10

22 Dec '10

The following are duplicaates: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42059 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=8110 (has the most votes) Thanks

2 1

[aur-general] Remove ardour3-svn
by Bernardo Barros 22 Dec '10

22 Dec '10

Hi, I suggest to remove ardour3-svn from AUR. It's not ready for use yet. See message from the author below. http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34433 ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Paul Davis <paul(a)linuxaudiosystems.com> Date: 2010/12/20 Subject: Re: [LAU] Ardour3 To: Bernardo Barros <bernardobarros2(a)gmail.com> Cc: Fabio <capoeirista(a)arcor.de>, linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Bernardo Barros <bernardobarros2(a)gmail.com> wrote: > It's not really a oficial arch binary package, paul.. > it's a arch user script that builds from svn. that doesn't make a whole heap of difference. people who use svn are at least 1 step closer to understanding that the first step after a crash is "svn update". people using arch build scripts ... not so much, i suspect. moreover, people using svn are probably (hopefully!) on the commit mailing list and can see that the version they got this morning is now 8 commits old by lunchtime. again, people using arch build scripts ... not so much

10 19