February 2010 - Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Change of Package Name
by José Valecillos 06 Feb '10

06 Feb '10

Hi Everybody. I need some help, i'm the current mantainer of dosbox-cvs package and i have a problem. The source code of CVS repository isn't being mainteined recently, it's deprecated. Instead, the SVN repository is actually mantained for the devel team and for the moment the one. I have no problem to update the PKGBUILD, but i need to change the name of the package because it won't be CVS anymore. Can any TU help me with that? -- José Valecillos

6 9

Re: [aur-general] [arch-notifications] Integrity Check i686: core, extra, community 05-02-2010
by Eric Bélanger 05 Feb '10

05 Feb '10

On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 4:00 PM, <repomaint(a)archlinux.org> wrote: > > ================================================ > = Integrity Check i686 of core,extra,community = > ================================================ > > Duplicate PKGBUILDs > --------------------- > /srv/abs/rsync/i686/extra/abiword-plugins vs. /srv/abs/rsync/i686/extra/abiword > /srv/abs/rsync/i686/extra/xmlrpc-c vs. /srv/abs/rsync/i686/community/xmlrpc-c > What's the deal with xmlrpc-c ? It seems that it was moved from extra to community repo. Is that correct? But the package is still in the extra db. It's in the community svn but the package isn't in the community repo yet. Did someone forgot to run db-community?

1 0

[aur-general] Adoption of python-markdown
by Andrew Antle 05 Feb '10

05 Feb '10

I've adopted python-markdown in [unsupported]. http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10797 -- Andrew Antle <andrew dot antle at gmail dot com>

2 2

[aur-general] [exim] Bump to 4.71
by Angel Velásquez 05 Feb '10

05 Feb '10

Hi, Yesterday Andrea (BaSh) moved to [community] exim, when I arrived home I got the bug notifications which the package had when it was on [extra]; but Daniel (Ghost1227) closes those bug too fast :O (I already said thank to him), now that those bugs are closed, I packaged a new release and it's on [community-testing] I would like some feedback from exim's user, so if the package it's ready I will move it from [community-testing] to [community]. Opinions? -- Angel Velásquez angvp @ irc.freenode.net Arch Linux Trusted User Linux Counter: #359909 http://www.angvp.com

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request
by Massimiliano Torromeo 05 Feb '10

05 Feb '10

Hi, please delete my aur package virtuoso-opensource since it is in testing and will be officially supported by arch. http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24036 Thanks.

3 4

Re: [aur-general] TU without [community] maintaining?
by Andrea Fagiani 04 Feb '10

04 Feb '10

On 02/03/2010 02:41 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Am 03.02.2010 15:32, schrieb Lex Rivera: > >> Hi all. I wanna ask is it possible to become TU without [community] >> maintaining, just as AUR moderator? >> > I think it is a good idea. We could create the "AUR moderator" position > instead of calling it "Semi-TU". > > When I was a TU, I didn't care at all about moderating the AUR, and > maybe other TUs feel the same and rather do packaging. Conversely, you > don't seem to care about packaging but about AUR moderation. > > I am forwarding this to arch-dev-public for reference, but I guess > ultimately the TUs have to decide. > > I also think there is a lot of work to be done "polishing" the AUR, and that could be a good start.

4 3

[aur-general] oss maintainer needed
by Ionut Biru 04 Feb '10

04 Feb '10

Hi TUs, any of you are using oss? Now that Paulo has resigned, oss has no maintainer anymore and we have a bug pending on bugtracker. I can't do any fixes or maintenance since i don't use it and i don't intend to use it. -- Ionut

2 1

[aur-general] Status of Shorewall and Shorewall6
by Malte Rabenseifner 04 Feb '10

04 Feb '10

Greetings TUs, I just want to ask about the status of Shorewall and Shorewall6. I agree that it is worth keeping in [community] but it has been dropped to AUR several hours ago. Now it is back in [community], my AUR packages (that I initially just adopted) are deleted again. I am willing to maintain it in AUR but first of all please clarify whether it should be maintained in AUR or orphaned in [community]. =) Best regards, -- Malte Rabenseifner malte(a)zearan.de Germany -- Vor dem Wissen kommt das Verstehen. Vor dem Verstehen kommt das Sehen. Vor dem Sehen kommt das Erkennen. Vor dem Erkennen kommt das Wissen. -- Beneath knowing, understanding. Beneath understanding, seeing. Beneath seeing, recognizing. Beneath recognizing, knowing. --

2 1

[aur-general] comical and moonlight deleted from db but still on FTP
by Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi 04 Feb '10

04 Feb '10

Hola, ftp://ftp.archlinux.org/community/os/i686/comical-0.8-3.pkg.tar.gz ftp://ftp.archlinux.org/community/os/x86_64/comical-0.8-3.pkg.tar.gz ftp://ftp.archlinux.org/community/os/i686/moonlight-1.0.1-5.pkg.tar.gz ftp://ftp.archlinux.org/community/os/x86_64/moonlight-1.0.1-5.pkg.tar.gz Seems that this is not detected by " Integrity Check" reports. Chau. -- Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi ( djgera ) http://www.djgera.com.ar KeyID: 0x1B8C330D Key fingerprint = 0CAA D5D4 CD85 4434 A219 76ED 39AB 221B 1B8C 330D

12 18

Re: [aur-general] [arch-dev-public] exim maintainer wanted
by Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi 04 Feb '10

04 Feb '10

On 02/01/2010 12:08 AM, Allan McRae wrote: > exim has no maintainer and I have been assigned a bug for it as the > last person to rebuild it (db-4.8 rebuild). I do not use it and have > no intentions of fixing the bug. Does anybody want to be the maintainer? > > Allan > > If not dev take it, I guess, should be moved to [community] if there is some TU interested on it. Or drop it directly to AUR. Current exim version in [extra] is 3.69 (2007/12/20) and latest is 4.71 (2009/11/23). There are two open bug/feature reports with fixes attached [#1] [#1] http://bugs.archlinux.org/?project=1&string=exim -- Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi ( djgera ) http://www.djgera.com.ar KeyID: 0x1B8C330D Key fingerprint = 0CAA D5D4 CD85 4434 A219 76ED 39AB 221B 1B8C 330D

3 2