December 2011 - Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Developer / TU key signing, first master key available
by Thomas Bächler 05 Dec '11

05 Dec '11

Hello developers / TUs, My Arch master key is available at [1] with fingerprint 6841 48BB 25B4 9E98 6A49 44C5 5184 252D 824B 18E8. Every packager, please do the following: 1) Reply to this email to thomas(a)master-key.archlinux.org and fully quote this email. Include your gerolde/sigurd username in the email. Sign your reply using your GPG key. 2) Upload your public key (gpg --armor --export $KEYID) to your home directory on gerolde/sigurd under the name $HOME/arch-linux-packager-key. 3) Name at least one package in the repositories already signed with your key. Sadly, this process will only prove that you are in posession of the ssh key to upload packages into the repositories. I will contact you personally afterwards if I need further identification. Please note: there are be 5 master key holders (Allan, Dan, Pierre, Ionut, me), and you need at least 3 signatures on your key so your packages will be trusted by pacman. Regards Thomas [1] https://dev.archlinux.org/~thomas/thomas_AT_master-key.archlinux.org.asc

6 6

[aur-general] Rename package?
by Jonathan Steel 05 Dec '11

05 Dec '11

The name of this package doesn't seem quite right: "lib32-gstreamer0.10-base `pacman -Q|grep gstreamer0\.10\-" https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15586

3 2

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 04 Dec '11

04 Dec '11

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 1 fully signed off package * 13 packages missing signoffs * 4 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (11 total) == * fail2ban-0.8.4-4 (any) 0/2 signoffs * pacman-contrib-4.0.1-1 (any) 1/2 signoffs * expac-0.07-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * i3-wm-4.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * i3lock-2.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * packagekit-0.6.19-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * qtcreator-2.4.0rc-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * i3-wm-4.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * i3lock-2.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * packagekit-0.6.19-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * qtcreator-2.4.0rc-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * percona-server-5.5.17_rel22.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * percona-server-5.5.17_rel22.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Completed signoffs (1 total) == * expac-0.07-1 (x86_64) == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (4 total) == * expac-0.07-1 (i686), since 2011-10-13 * expac-0.07-1 (x86_64), since 2011-10-13 * qtcreator-2.4.0rc-1 (i686), since 2011-11-17 * qtcreator-2.4.0rc-1 (x86_64), since 2011-11-17 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. heftig - 6 signoffs 2. dreisner - 2 signoffs 3. dan - 2 signoffs 4. remy - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [multilib-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 04 Dec '11

04 Dec '11

=== Signoff report for [multilib-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 3 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [multilib] (3 total) == * binutils-multilib-2.22-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gcc-multilib-4.6.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * lib32-glibc-2.14.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. heftig - 6 signoffs 2. dreisner - 2 signoffs 3. dan - 2 signoffs 4. remy - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Disown request
by rafael ff1 03 Dec '11

03 Dec '11

accerciser is very out-of-date (pkg: 1.12.1, current: 3.3.1), with last update in Oct 2010. This, IMHO shows the lack of interest of the maintainer to fix the package. Please disown, so I can update it. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14252 Thanks

2 1

[aur-general] Orphan request -ttf-ubuntu
by Neil Perry 03 Dec '11

03 Dec '11

Hi All, Can a TU please Orphan package ttf-ubuntu [1]. I would like to take over maintaining this package. Many Thanks, Neil [1] - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47336

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [multilib-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 03 Dec '11

03 Dec '11

=== Signoff report for [multilib-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 3 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 3 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [multilib-testing] in last 24 hours (3 total) == * binutils-multilib-2.22-1 (x86_64) * gcc-multilib-4.6.2-2 (x86_64) * lib32-glibc-2.14.1-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [multilib] (3 total) == * binutils-multilib-2.22-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gcc-multilib-4.6.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * lib32-glibc-2.14.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. foutrelis - 4 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 03 Dec '11

03 Dec '11

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 1 fully signed off package * 13 packages missing signoffs * 4 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (11 total) == * fail2ban-0.8.4-4 (any) 0/2 signoffs * pacman-contrib-4.0.1-1 (any) 1/2 signoffs * expac-0.07-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * i3-wm-4.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * i3lock-2.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * packagekit-0.6.19-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * qtcreator-2.4.0rc-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * i3-wm-4.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * i3lock-2.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * packagekit-0.6.19-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * qtcreator-2.4.0rc-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * percona-server-5.5.17_rel22.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * percona-server-5.5.17_rel22.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Completed signoffs (1 total) == * expac-0.07-1 (x86_64) == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (4 total) == * expac-0.07-1 (i686), since 2011-10-13 * expac-0.07-1 (x86_64), since 2011-10-13 * qtcreator-2.4.0rc-1 (i686), since 2011-11-17 * qtcreator-2.4.0rc-1 (x86_64), since 2011-11-17 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. foutrelis - 4 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] email forwarding on sigurd
by Xyne 02 Dec '11

02 Dec '11

Hi, Can someone please point me to the documentation of setting up email forwarding on sigurd? I have a .forward file with the target email address in ~, but I'm not sure if this was all I had to do or what the address on sigurd is (<sigurd username>@aur.archlinux.org?). Thanks, Xyne

2 1

[aur-general] Adding GPG keys to profile
by Allan McRae 02 Dec '11

02 Dec '11

Hi Devs and TUs, Can all those who have not already done so please go to their profile page (https://www.archlinux.org/devel/profile/) and add their GPG key? Thanks, Allan

16 22