December 2011 - Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Merry Christmas!
by 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) 26 Dec '11

26 Dec '11

All Arch Linuxer, Merry Christmas,have a nice holiday!

20 25

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 26 Dec '11

26 Dec '11

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 2 fully signed off packages * 6 packages missing signoffs * 6 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (4 total) == * fail2ban-0.8.4-4 (any) 1/2 signoffs * expac-0.07-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * packagekit-0.6.19-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * packagekit-0.6.19-3 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * percona-server-5.5.18_rel23.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * percona-server-5.5.18_rel23.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Completed signoffs (2 total) == * pacman-contrib-4.0.1-1 (any) * expac-0.07-1 (x86_64) == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (6 total) == * expac-0.07-1 (i686), since 2011-10-13 * expac-0.07-1 (x86_64), since 2011-10-13 * pacman-contrib-4.0.1-1 (any), since 2011-11-25 * fail2ban-0.8.4-4 (any), since 2011-11-30 * packagekit-0.6.19-3 (i686), since 2011-11-30 * packagekit-0.6.19-3 (x86_64), since 2011-11-30 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. andyrtr - 4 signoffs 2. remy - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Orphan Request: perl-goo-canvas
by Shanto 25 Dec '11

25 Dec '11

perl-goo-canvas: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22821 * Package has broken dependencies since October 2011. * Marked out of date for 2 weeks (since 11th December). * Several comments with needed fix, but no response from tdy(a)gmx.com. I am maintaining Shutter (a popular one) for which this package is a (optional) dependency. So, I would like to take it from here.

2 2

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 25 Dec '11

25 Dec '11

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 2 fully signed off packages * 6 packages missing signoffs * 6 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (4 total) == * fail2ban-0.8.4-4 (any) 1/2 signoffs * expac-0.07-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * packagekit-0.6.19-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * packagekit-0.6.19-3 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * percona-server-5.5.18_rel23.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * percona-server-5.5.18_rel23.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Completed signoffs (2 total) == * pacman-contrib-4.0.1-1 (any) * expac-0.07-1 (x86_64) == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (6 total) == * expac-0.07-1 (i686), since 2011-10-13 * expac-0.07-1 (x86_64), since 2011-10-13 * pacman-contrib-4.0.1-1 (any), since 2011-11-25 * fail2ban-0.8.4-4 (any), since 2011-11-30 * packagekit-0.6.19-3 (i686), since 2011-11-30 * packagekit-0.6.19-3 (x86_64), since 2011-11-30 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] Orphan request: gnome-shell-extension-shellshape-git, shellshape-mutter-git
by Markus Unterwaditzer 24 Dec '11

24 Dec '11

It has been one and a half months since i sent an email to the maintainer of those packages, i've got no response yet. (I actually posted this one, but by deleting the email i was unable to reply to the original post to add the fact that he hasn't been responding since months) Merry Christmas.

2 2

[aur-general] Merge request: firefox32 and firefox32-i18n to bin32-firefox and bin32-firefox-i18n
by Gustavo Genovese 24 Dec '11

24 Dec '11

Hi Please remove firefox32 [1] and merge the votes to bin32-firefox [2] Also please remove firefox32-i18n [3] and merge the votes to bin32-firefox-i18n Thanks, [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18644 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55262 [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18647 [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55263 -- Gustavo Genovese

2 1

[aur-general] [Merge Request] lodgeitlib ->python2-lodgeitlib
by Stefan Husmann 24 Dec '11

24 Dec '11

Hello, please merge https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39500 (lodgeitlib) into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55250 (python2-lodgeitlib) The latter is better named and slightly improved. I maintain both packages. Thank you and Merry Christmas. Stefan

2 1

[aur-general] Package rename
by Gustavo Genovese 24 Dec '11

24 Dec '11

Hi, I've adopted this package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18644 (firefox32) some time ago and I think it should be renamed to bin32-firefox. Can you do this for me? Or should I just change the name in PKGBUILD and upload it? Also the i18n for this package ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18647 ) should be renamed too, to bin32-firefox-i18n Once renamed, how do I notify the people using the old package versions they should switch to the new ones? Just a comment in the old package? I really don't know how is the is stantard procedure to do this, so any help will be much appreciated. Thanks in advance Regards, -- Gustavo Genovese

3 4

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 24 Dec '11

24 Dec '11

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 4 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 2 fully signed off packages * 8 packages missing signoffs * 6 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (4 total) == * xbmc-10.1-11 (i686) * xbmc-10.1-11 (x86_64) * percona-server-5.5.18_rel23.0-1 (i686) * percona-server-5.5.18_rel23.0-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (6 total) == * fail2ban-0.8.4-4 (any) 1/2 signoffs * expac-0.07-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * packagekit-0.6.19-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * xbmc-10.1-11 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * packagekit-0.6.19-3 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * xbmc-10.1-11 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * percona-server-5.5.18_rel23.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * percona-server-5.5.18_rel23.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Completed signoffs (2 total) == * pacman-contrib-4.0.1-1 (any) * expac-0.07-1 (x86_64) == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (6 total) == * expac-0.07-1 (i686), since 2011-10-13 * expac-0.07-1 (x86_64), since 2011-10-13 * pacman-contrib-4.0.1-1 (any), since 2011-11-25 * fail2ban-0.8.4-4 (any), since 2011-11-30 * packagekit-0.6.19-3 (i686), since 2011-11-30 * packagekit-0.6.19-3 (x86_64), since 2011-11-30 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tomegun - 2 signoffs 2. allan - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] OCaml-PCRE
by oliver 24 Dec '11

24 Dec '11

Hello, I created a package for OCaml-PCRE, and have not seen that it already exists on AUR (but in a slightly older version). There is this one: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52452 And my new one: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55215 Now there are two packages for the same stuff... Any idea how to handle it? Ciao, Oliver

5 11