> Hi,
>
> my arch master key is available [1] with fingerprint 44D4 A033 AC14 0143
> 9273 97D4 7EFD 567D 4C7E A887.
>
> Every packager please do:
>
> 1) reply this email in the mailing list, include gerolde/sigurd username
> and sign your reply using your gpg key.
> 2) name at least one package you already signed.
>
> [1] https://dev.archlinux.org/~ibiru/ionut_AT_master-key.archlinux.org
Sigurd username: tredaelli
Package signed: netselect, ragel, sub2srt
--
Timothy Redaelli
drizztbsd @ irc.freenode.net
> Hello developers / TUs,
>
> My Arch master key is available at [1] with fingerprint 6841 48BB
> 25B4 9E98 6A49 44C5 5184 252D 824B 18E8.
>
> Every packager, please do the following: 1) Reply to this email to
> thomas at master-key.archlinux.org and fully quote this email. Include
> your gerolde/sigurd username in the email. Sign your reply using
> your GPG key. 2) Upload your public key (gpg --armor --export
> $KEYID) to your home directory on gerolde/sigurd under the name
> $HOME/arch-linux-packager-key. 3) Name at least one package in the
> repositories already signed with your key.
>
> Sadly, this process will only prove that you are in posession of
> the ssh key to upload packages into the repositories. I will
> contact you personally afterwards if I need further
> identification.
>
> Please note: there are be 5 master key holders (Allan, Dan,
> Pierre, Ionut, me), and you need at least 3 signatures on your key
> so your packages will be trusted by pacman.
>
> Regards Thomas
>
> [1]
> https://dev.archlinux.org/~thomas/thomas_AT_master-key.archlinux.org.asc
>
Sigurd username: tredaelli
Package signed: netselect, ragel, sub2srt
--
Timothy Redaelli
drizztbsd @ irc.freenode.net
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 2 fully signed off packages
* 8 packages missing signoffs
* 8 packages older than 14 days
(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)
== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (6 total) ==
* fail2ban-0.8.4-4 (any)
1/2 signoffs
* expac-0.07-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* lilypond-2.14.2-3 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* packagekit-0.6.19-3 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* lilypond-2.14.2-3 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs
* packagekit-0.6.19-3 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs
== Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) ==
* percona-server-5.5.17_rel22.1-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* percona-server-5.5.17_rel22.1-1 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs
== Completed signoffs (2 total) ==
* pacman-contrib-4.0.1-1 (any)
* expac-0.07-1 (x86_64)
== All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (8 total) ==
* expac-0.07-1 (i686), since 2011-10-13
* expac-0.07-1 (x86_64), since 2011-10-13
* pacman-contrib-4.0.1-1 (any), since 2011-11-25
* percona-server-5.5.17_rel22.1-1 (i686), since 2011-11-27
* percona-server-5.5.17_rel22.1-1 (x86_64), since 2011-11-27
* fail2ban-0.8.4-4 (any), since 2011-11-30
* packagekit-0.6.19-3 (i686), since 2011-11-30
* packagekit-0.6.19-3 (x86_64), since 2011-11-30
== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==
1. bisson - 3 signoffs
2. tomegun - 2 signoffs
3. andrea - 2 signoffs
4. lcarlier - 1 signoffs
Hello,
qtd-svn (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25827) is obsolete
since qtd project is now at bitbucket and there is newer qtd-hg package.
Sincerely,
Gour
--
A self-realized man has no purpose to fulfill in the discharge
of his prescribed duties, nor has he any reason not to perform
such work. Nor has he any need to depend on any other living being.
http://atmarama.net | Hlapicina (Croatia) | GPG: 52B5C810
Hello again,
Please remove zsnes-wip
link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=2029
reason: project no longer under development, package is massively
outdated, newer AUR entry is available here
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24361. Keeping a 4 year old
wip package seems silly.
Please orphan gpar2
link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=3696
reason: I've flagged the package out-of-date 18 sept, emailed the
maintainer 21 nov (no reply) and I have a simple fix to keep the
application functional. This is something I use quite a bit, I'd like
to update and maintain it.
Please remove.
name: nvtv
aur link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=4234
reason: no changes since 2006, no longer workable with latest xserver,
segfaults on latest nvidia driver, no patches available.
thanks.
Please delete my package denemo-sinsmf.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40705
No file conflict anymore when attempting to install
both libsmf and denemo, thus it is now obsolete.
thanks
Hi guys,
I am trying to resuscitate the dkms-fglrx package [1]. I am wondering what
I should leave in (the ATi Linux installer comes with a lot of binary
stuff).
I checked the catalyst PKGBUILD in the AUR, while it copies a lot of
libraries, it does not seem to copy e.g. stuff like AMD's XvBA libraries
and the fgl_glxgears fglrxinfo binaries (which I think can be handy to be
distributed with the driver).
Any pointers as to what can, has to, or should not be included?
Cheers
Stijn
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11661