Aur-general March 2011

aur-general@lists.archlinux.org

107 participants
108 discussions

[aur-general] Should nvidia(-beta)-all replace all the other nvidia-* packages in the AUR?
by Det 01 Apr '11

01 Apr '11

Helloooo, So I've been thinking about this for some time now and I finally decided to ask the ones who know the best: would it be enough to only have 'nvidia-beta-all' and 'nvidia-all' in the AUR to replace all those nvidia-ice, nvidia-bfs, eg. packages? (Decluding nvidia-utils*, of course.) As far as I can think of, I can't see any downside(s) (whatsoever) of using those *-all packages instead of those 'specifc-kernel' packages, since they do in fact auto-detect all the kernels on the system. Now to the important part: what do you think? Det

6 12

[aur-general] Dealing with python-* versus python2-* packages
by Aaron DeVore 31 Mar '11

31 Mar '11

I started maintaining some Python 2 packages that currently use the python- prefix, but need to be renamed to use python2-. Python 3 versions will soon come out, so I don't want people using the python-* package until then. I want to still have the packages in the AUR so that someone doesn't accidentally recreate the python-* package. How do I make sure that people don't use the python-* packages until it's appropriate? -Aaron DeVore

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: gtk3
by Károly Pados 31 Mar '11

31 Mar '11

I created a basic gtk3 package in AUR, though later I noticed that there is a gnome-unstable repository, with gtk3 in it. Please delete my gtk3 package in AUR, I don't want it to start conflicting with gnome-unstable things and it is also redundant as it turns out. So I guess it is probably unwanted, or else let me know and I'll keep maintaining it until it gets stable. Thank you and sorry for the trouble.

2 1

[aur-general] orphan and deletion requests (stormlib and stormlib-linux)
by william 56 31 Mar '11

31 Mar '11

i am requesting that stormlib become orphaned, and stormlib-linux be deleted. stormlib-linux (21638) appears to be a duplicate of stormlib (21634), and both packages are unbuildable, as the stormlib source archive which both aur packages compile from has been altered. i sent an email to the package maintainer, zarra (8415), regarding updating his packages, and have yet to receive a response. also, a user commented on the stormlib package with an updated PKGBUILD file on september 23, 2010, though it appeared to go unnoticed by the maintainer. thanks, arch users!

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request
by Seven Seven 31 Mar '11

31 Mar '11

Kaffeine has moved to git, please remove kaffeine-kde4-svn http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18985. Thanks.

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request : gsimplecal-hg
by Calimero 30 Mar '11

30 Mar '11

Hello ! gsimplecal now uses git, the gsimplecal-hg package I was maintaining isn't needed anymore. Could a TU remove it ? Thank you !

2 1

[aur-general] svn and git package
by Axilleas P 30 Mar '11

30 Mar '11

Is it ok if I upload a package-git if there already is a package-svn in the AUR? Practically the git repo is a mirror of the svn one. I'm talking about clementine-svn in particular. -- (\_ /) copy the bunny to your profile (0.o ) to help him achieve world domination. (> <) come join the dark side. /_|_\ (we have cookies.)

4 4

[aur-general] Deletion request
by Alessio Sergi 30 Mar '11

30 Mar '11

Hi TUs, please delete the following packages: banshee-1-svn [1] (obsolete, replaced by banshee-git [2]); banshee-notify-osd [3] (obsolete, upstream version of banshee already includes notify-osd support) banshee-1-lyrics-plugin [4] banshee-alarm-plugin-svn [5] banshee-albumart-plugin-svn [6] bashee-cleanup-plugin-svn [7] banshee-clutterflow [8] banshee-radiostationfetcher-plugin [9], banshee-showtrakonchange-plugin [10] banshee-telepathy-extension-git [11] (obsolete, banshee-community-{extensions,extensions-git} [12] [13] ship all these plugins) podsleuth-svn [14] njb-sharp-svn [15] ipod-sharp-svn [16] libipoddevice-svn [17] taglib-sharp-svn [18] webkit-sharp-svn [19] (obsolete, since banshee has moved to git) mono-addins-svn [20] (obsolete, replaced by mono-addins-git [21]) gtkpod-git-nano5g [22] libgpod-kmaglione-git [23] libgpod-teuf-git [24] (useless, upstream release of libgpod includes iPod Nano 5G support) Thanks in advance. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15961 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26048 [3] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24491 [4] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17334 [5] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10714 [6] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10713 [7] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10710 [8] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33475 [9] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34033 [10] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10712 [11] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33048 [12] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36189 <http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36189>[13] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34952 [14] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16893 [15] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=6282 [16] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=6281 [17] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10247 [18] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13221 [19] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31701 [20] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13668 [21] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47092 [22] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33517 [23] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33516 [24] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33488 -- Alessio Sergi

2 3

[aur-general] Delete Request
by speps 29 Mar '11

29 Mar '11

Hi, just talked with Stefano D'Angelo, Naspro project leader. naspro-bridges-bad is being replaced by naspro-bridges and could be deleted. naspro-bridges-bad > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39382 cheers - speps -

2 1

[aur-general] Dropping multiget
by Stefan Husmann 29 Mar '11

29 Mar '11

Hello, I would like to drop the multiget package from [community] for the following reasons. - the tarball does not build. The error consist in a missing header file and was reported twice on upstream bugtracker without an answer - the latest svn-checkout builds, but the revision number is still low, it is 3. So what do you think? Should I upload a svn-based PKGBUILD or drop the package? In svn there is a desktop file, which never made it to the tarball. This would at least allow me to remove multiget from the list in FS#23387. Regards Stefan

2 2

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

Aur-general March 2011