May 2011 - Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Orphans [extra] repository cleanup
by Andrea Scarpino 13 May '11

13 May '11

Hi DEVs/TUs, I'm again on the cleanup of orphans packages in the [extra] repository; this time with a small list[1]. The list is based on orphans packages needed by none. I don't see very important packages there, but chromium, krusader, mc and proftpd which maybe should be kept in [extra]; though they will probably find their maintainers in [community]. As the last time (more than 7 months ago), please cross out the packages you want to keep in [extra]. Adoption is not required, but it would be nice. If you are a TU you can ask to maintain a package writing its name to the "Candidate to [community]" list[2]. I invite all you maintainers to check the orphans packages on the Arch website, many are maintained packages where the maintainer simply forgot to adopt it. Thanks [1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/DeveloperWiki:Repo_Cleanup [2] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/DeveloperWiki:Repo_Cleanup#Candidate_t… -- Andrea

8 10

[aur-general] Inactivity
by Sergej Pupykin 12 May '11

12 May '11

Hi, I am off until 01-jun-2011.

1 0

[aur-general] Request for removal (blok-git)
by Harley Laue 12 May '11

12 May '11

blok-git has been broken for some time upstream and seems unlikely to change. At the time it was sort of a proof-of-concept and now it's just source rotting. Because of this, blok-git can/should be removed. Thanks.

2 1

Re: [aur-general] [arch-dev-public] Orphans [extra] repository cleanup
by KESHAV P.R. 12 May '11

12 May '11

On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 20:04, Ionut Biru <ibiru(a)archlinux.org> wrote: > On 05/12/2011 02:53 PM, Andrea Scarpino wrote: > >> gptfdisk > >> >> If there are no objections I'll move all them tomorrow. >> > > keep that. we also have a feature request on the tracker to include it on > the iso > > -- > Ionuț > GPT fdisk is maintained by Tobias Powalowski (tpowa). Orphaning that should have been a mistake since archboot installer uses gdisk extensively. I maintain gptfdisk-git http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39338 . - Keshav

2 1

[aur-general] Cutleaves(package)
by Nathan Owens 11 May '11

11 May '11

Can somebody delete cutleaves http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11371 I looked for another homepage for it on softpedia, linuxappfinder, and also debian packages and I can't find it. Nor does the download location exist anymore

2 1

[aur-general] Request for assistance with a PKGBUILD
by Joel Heaton 11 May '11

11 May '11

Hello fellow AUR maintainers, I've come to ask for some of your wisdom on a particular subject because, quite frankly, I'm completely unsure of how to move forward. I'm attempting to put together a PKGBUILD for a library (tsdl) but running in to trouble with the installation part. I can run make no problem, everything proceeds as expected, however I receive a permission error when running make install. The output is shown below at the point which it fails. http://pastebin.com/0xVvf1kN Obviously this is going to fail unless makepkg -s is run as root, which is highlighted as not being a good idea, so I'm basically looking at how I could get around this, if at all. I'll admit that I'm still getting to grips with this, having only put together two PKGBUILDs from scratch before now, so I would appreciate any pointers that could guide me in the right direction. Below are links to the PKGBUILD I'm working on, as well as the Makefile for the library I want to build respectively. I can see that there are a bunch of operations going on in there which will result in more permission denied errors, but if I'm thinking along the right lines, then these could be installed using install -D -mXXX but again, I'm quite inexperienced so I don't know if that is entirely true. http://pastebin.com/xzVRt79d http://pastebin.com/sTN1j80f Please also feel free to criticise the PKGBUILD in general; I've been following what I've seen by other maintainers so far and trying to stick to the guidelines laid out in the Wiki pages, so hopefully it's all fine but if I have missed anything or done something stupid, I'd like to know. Thanks in advance for any help. Kind regards, Joel.

4 6

[aur-general] AUR deletion of jsvc
by Guillaume ALAUX 10 May '11

10 May '11

Hello, Same deletion request for AUR package "jsvc" now officially in extra/java-jsvc. -- Guillaume ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Byron Clark <byron(a)theclarkfamily.name> Date: 10 May 2011 14:41 Subject: Re: AUR Comment for jsvc To: guillaume(a)alaux.net Thanks for getting jsvc into extra. This package is ready for deletion as there are no packages that depend on it in aur and I've updated all my personal packages that use it. -- Byron Clark On 05/10/11 at 06:08am, aur-notify(a)archlinux.org wrote: > from http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33850 > galaux wrote: > > Hello byronc, > > "commons-daemon" recently made its ways to extra. Hence I will ask for > this AUR packages to be removed. > > You might want to check/update other AUR packages you own that depend > on this one to use the official ones. Please report any issue you > might have with the new packages through the bug tracker. > > New official packages are "tomcat-native", "java-commons-daemon" and > "java-jsvc". > > Thanks > > --- > If you no longer wish to receive notifications about this package, > please go the the above package page and click the UnNotify button.

2 2

[aur-general] Package deletion tomcat-fhs
by Guillaume ALAUX 10 May '11

10 May '11

Hello, Package "tomcat-fhs" [0] from AUR is an out-of-date duplicate of [1] with no particular improvement (along with strange naming). I would thus vote for deletion of "tomcat-fhs" [0] even though it seems it was submitted first. [0] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14324 [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19452 -- Guillaume

2 1

[aur-general] AUR tomcat7 package deletion
by Guillaume ALAUX 10 May '11

10 May '11

Hello, Tomcat 7 is now officially supported in Extra. Could you please delete this AUR version named "tomcat7" I own? http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39035 Thanks -- Guillaume

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request
by Dan Vratil 10 May '11

10 May '11

Hi, gqclient [1] seems to be duplicate of gq from community. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45362 Regards Dan Vratil -- --- Dan Vrátil dan(a)progdan.cz Tel.: +420732326870 Jabber: progdan(a)jabber.cz Tento email neobsahuje žádné viry, protože odesílatel nepoužívá Windows. / This email does not contain any viruses because the sender does not use Windows.

2 1