January 2012 - Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 25 Jan '12

25 Jan '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 2 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bisson - 6 signoffs 2. allan - 4 signoffs 3. lfleischer - 4 signoffs 4. tomegun - 3 signoffs 5. stephane - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] makepkg/yaourt issues
by masutu 25 Jan '12

25 Jan '12

Hi all, after recent upgrades (pacman 4, yaourt) i'm having issues with makepkg/yaourt (i) zipman option in "/etc/makepkg.conf" if zipman is enabled in "/etc/makepkg.conf", makepkg gives errors like [...] ==> Tidying install... -> Purging unwanted files... -> Compressing man and info pages... ==> ERROR: An unknown error has occurred. Exiting... [...] when running as root (yaourt/makepkg). Surprisingly man pages do get gzipped and work correctly, so no real problem, just wondering. When running makepkg as normal user, this error message doesn't occur. Similar issue is discussed in https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1046860. (ii) version control example: trying to build lilv ( http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49333) from aur, which contains the line "depends=([...] 'sord>=0.5.0' 'sord<1.0.0' [...])" when running "yaourt -S lilv" i get an error: ==> lilv dependencies: [...] - sord>=0.5.0 (building from AUR) - sord<1.0.0 (building from AUR) [...] ==> Continue building lilv ? [Y/n] ==> ------------------------------ ==> ==> Building and installing package ==> Install or build missing dependencies for lilv: error: target not found: sord<1.0.0 ==> Restart building lilv ? [y/N] but when installing sord-0.5.0-1 beforhand, lilv installs fine: ~$ yaourt -S lilv ==> lilv dependencies: [...] - sord>=0.5.0 (already installed) - sord<1.0.0 (already installed) [...] ==> Continue building lilv ? [Y/n] [...] Is this a bug or normal behaviour? Sorry for this messy post and thanks in advance for your replies. -masutu

2 1

[aur-general] Rename `identicurse` and `identicurse-nogit`
by Psychedelic Squid 24 Jan '12

24 Jan '12

Hey, just wondering what the best approach would be for renaming `identicurse` and `identicurse-nogit` to the more consistent (with other AUR packages) `identicurse-git` and`identicurse`, respectively. In particular, is there any way to prevent the current git users ending up on the new non-git package, given the old git package and the new non-git package would have the same name?

3 7

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 24 Jan '12

24 Jan '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 2 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 3 signoffs 2. ibiru - 2 signoffs 3. stephane - 2 signoffs 4. pierre - 2 signoffs 5. foutrelis - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] [Removal request] vym-git
by Stefan Husmann 24 Jan '12

24 Jan '12

Hello, there is not point in having vym-git in AUR. The stable version in [ccommunity] has a higher version number, and developement actually takes place not in git, but in Suse's build service. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48023 Regards Stefan

2 1

[aur-general] orphan request: dma
by Giorgio Lando 23 Jan '12

23 Jan '12

Could someone orphan the following in unsupported: dma http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17039 The maintainer is not responsive to comments, updates it only randomly and did not reply in a week to an email concerning dma. Moreover, the main dma upstream developer (corecode, who is also an arch user) is already maintaining a PKGBUILD in his gitorious repo and would be happy to maintain it in the AUR too (see the comments). Thanks in advance Giorgio Lando

2 1

[aur-general] Removal Request: dropbox-faenza-*; pkgbuilder-legacy
by Kwpolska 23 Jan '12

23 Jan '12

Hello. I need to get rid of three of my packages: 1. dropbox-faenza-dark: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43890 Reason: those icons are included in the actual faenza-icon-theme. 2. dropbox-faenza-light: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48260 Reason: those icons are included in the actual faenza-icon-theme. 3. pkgbuilder-legacy: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=53699 Reason: pacman 4 is in [core] for a week. -- Kwpolska <http://kwpolska.tk> stop html mail | always bottom-post www.asciiribbon.org | www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html GPG KEY: 5EAAEA16 | Arch Linux x86_64, zsh, mutt, vim. # vim:set textwidth=70:

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 23 Jan '12

23 Jan '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 2 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bisson - 5 signoffs 2. tpowa - 4 signoffs 3. dreisner - 2 signoffs 4. dan - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] [Removal request] libcurl3 & libopenssl2
by Krzysztof Grygiencz 22 Jan '12

22 Jan '12

Hi, Can someone delete two of my packages that is [1] libcurl3 and [2] libopenssl2. Sometime ago mprime depend on them, but now they are no longer needed and they are old, deprecated and buggy. [1] - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19375 [2] - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19379 Regards, Krzysztof Grygiencz (kfgz)

2 1

[aur-general] [request remove] dclib-svn, eiskaltdc and eiskaltdc-svn
by SpinFlo 22 Jan '12

22 Jan '12

http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25636 -> no longer used (include in eiskaltdcpp project) http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28815 -> outdated http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29623 -> used git intead (outdated) greetings

2 1