Aur-general January 2012

aur-general@lists.archlinux.org

99 participants
119 discussions

[aur-general] Rename `menhir`
by Sergei Lebedev 17 Jan '12

17 Jan '12

Hello, Can you please rename `menhir` [1] to `ocaml-menhir` [2], to follow OCaml Package Guidelines [3]? Cheers, Sergei [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15726 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55883 [3] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/OCaml_Package_Guidelines

2 1

[aur-general] Merge and removal request
by Hyacinthe Cartiaux 17 Jan '12

17 Jan '12

Hello, oxygen-gtk package has been renamed oxygen-gtk2 (in order to avoid confusion with oxygen-gtk3). In the same way, I have created a new package lib32-oxygen-gtk2. Now, I would like to merge votes and comments with the old package lib32-oxygen-gtk, and delete it from AUR. Is it possible ? Thanks for your time ;) -- Hyacinthe

2 1

[aur-general] Rename/Merge request: oxygen-gtk-git ==> oxygen-gtk2-git
by Jekyll Wu 17 Jan '12

17 Jan '12

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Since extra/oxygen-gtk has renamed to extra/oxygen-gtk2. the corresponding devel package oxygen-gtk-git[1] (currently maintained by me)on AUR should follow. I have created another package oxygen-gtk2-git[1]. Please merge the comments and votes. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43581 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55867 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPFUj3AAoJEOemZ9znWXlApOwQAJl1+3pOk4T6g9W7Lj0gu8rA L6OF+r3xXah5ky32Vtfmj5dK4MEq2qbb+A+hH4kLmACtOWcVPbFChSge0q4UE5q5 5r0p6ecTRvhFy/XcC4+I83eeitgfzSBbtDnroc68u+0U+yE27SURmaFF0gu7nTZ8 z1D2uEfABUw9w/ITqGa3vJD5L0J8mmiPfbVR+GUuXRq+5RikI0NTXQzOiXC6gFhW bJdtVc8+14gpgw2iTrDS4sDXTZoJc7/R1RB62SqOROZ63WB8jqofs9hAgZ+EXjma 5Xn+YwyWtLuNm3I+i6K9LzaaAfx+KZsLFZZJrKNJEvxIx0BZv2F46l4j0bKhayyh A71ZLrIJ2X8+Yd+TmHNsx+xP07yTClbCZOvy0Zz8S7fNe/eiSWAcS1PypnmrxfOC WjgxlXBXIh7gLgnGePKtR2cTcpUCkqWW/lgg4NPskhs+IlB/xo9QBV5ec1aqyR2r oj2EYzrOVSPe7an7PsgOk1IqzE/cuSkx+O6EBauv2RQ+bWB+hIZfTFKBMvQWKEfH IXgKWiNZDxc8jyng93K5XEcQ1NU6Jbx1OlHDwf3OYfbIRwxFOSWttDB5kzp5QpA0 uREEW00ieFNDA619H5UJCsFmyTweBZqWSY1Wmvd5Wi9ZlisskbDkL+g7D55rhxRt fhBzCXU57tJAvQxbHbQO =jjIJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 17 Jan '12

17 Jan '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 1 new package in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 1 fully signed off package * 7 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (1 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (7 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tomoyo-tools-2.5.0.20111025-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.8-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tomoyo-tools-2.5.0.20111025-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Completed signoffs (1 total) == * virtualbox-modules-4.1.8-2 (x86_64) == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bisson - 4 signoffs 2. allan - 4 signoffs 3. tomegun - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Removal request: ruby-postgres
by Manu 16 Jan '12

16 Jan '12

Hi,. Please remove ruby-postgres [1] from AUR. It is now packaged as a gem, and apparently the name has changed to ruby-pg. I uploaded the new PKGBUILD here [2]. Cheers, Manu [1]* *https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19735 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55848

2 1

[aur-general] Disown request for `menhir`
by Sergei Lebedev 16 Jan '12

16 Jan '12

Hello, Is it possible to disown `menhir` [*] package? It has been flagged as OOD since October, and maintainer seems to ignore the comments completely. Thanks, Sergei [*] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15726

3 6

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 16 Jan '12

16 Jan '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 3 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 4 fully signed off packages * 18 packages missing signoffs * 3 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (3 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686) * lilypond-2.14.2-4 (i686) * libzdb-2.10-1 (i686) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (17 total) == * balsa-2.4.11-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * expac-0.07-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * lilypond-2.14.2-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * packagekit-0.6.19-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pinot-0.98-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pkgtools-23-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tomoyo-tools-2.5.0.20111025-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vdrift-2011.10.22-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.8-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * balsa-2.4.11-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * packagekit-0.6.19-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pinot-0.98-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tomoyo-tools-2.5.0.20111025-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vdrift-2011.10.22-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (1 total) == * libzdb-2.10-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs == Completed signoffs (4 total) == * pacman-contrib-4.0.1-1 (any) * expac-0.07-1 (x86_64) * pkgtools-23-3 (x86_64) * virtualbox-modules-4.1.8-2 (x86_64) == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (3 total) == * expac-0.07-1 (i686), since 2011-10-13 * expac-0.07-1 (x86_64), since 2011-10-13 * pacman-contrib-4.0.1-1 (any), since 2011-11-25 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. andyrtr - 4 signoffs 2. thomas - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] [removal request] - ttf-droid-mono-slashed
by member graysky 16 Jan '12

16 Jan '12

This package is duplicated in the more popular and maintained ttf-droid-monovar. Therefore, please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40418

2 1

[aur-general] Removal Request (perl-image-exiftool)
by Jakob Nixdorf 16 Jan '12

16 Jan '12

Hi, could someone remove the package 'perl-image-exiftool' [1] from the AUR? It's the same package as 'perl-exiftool' in [extra]. Thanks, Jakob [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48076 -- Mail: flocke(a)shadowice.org Jabber: flocke(a)shadowice.org PGP: 0654C07F (hkp://pgp.mit.edu:11371) Web: http://shadowice.org

2 1

[aur-general] [Removal request] metslib-newest
by Krzysztof Grygiencz 15 Jan '12

15 Jan '12

Hi, Please delete my package [1] metslib-newest because I'll update metslib to stable branch (0.5) and nuke 0.4 (buggy branch). [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43739 Regards, Krzysztof Grygiencz (kfgz)

2 1

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
...
12
Older →

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

Aur-general January 2012