October 2012 - Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Removal requests
by Schala Zeal 22 Oct '12

22 Oct '12

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=63728 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=63396 In order to allow users to have more customization to the addons, I've adjusted these packages in such a way that their package names seem unsuitable and have reuploaded them with new names.

2 1

[aur-general] dropping vim-gist
by Jelle van der Waa 21 Oct '12

21 Oct '12

Hi, I don't use vim-gist anymore, so is anyone interested in adopting it else I'll drop it.

2 2

[aur-general] [Removal Request] gnome-shell-extension-alternative-status-menu-git
by Maxime Gauduin 21 Oct '12

21 Oct '12

Hi, Please remove said package of mine, Power Off is visible by default since GNOME 3.6. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48607 Thx in advance. -- Alucryd "In the name of God, impure souls of the living dead shall be banished into eternal damnation. Amen."

3 3

[aur-general] orphan request: fatsort
by Antonis Kouliakiotis 21 Oct '12

21 Oct '12

Please orphan fatsort [1]. It is flagged for 4 months now, also the maintainer is notified through the comments and by email 2 weeks ago without taking any action. [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=4487

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 21 Oct '12

21 Oct '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 3 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 19 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (3 total) == * transmageddon-0.25-1 (any) * espeakup-0.71-5 (i686) * espeakup-0.71-5 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (19 total) == * transmageddon-0.25-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * almanah-0.10.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * espeakup-0.71-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.6.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.6.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gtk-engine-unico-1.0.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * lxdm-0.4.1-17 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * qtcreator-2.6.0rc-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.13.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * almanah-0.10.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * espeakup-0.71-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.6.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.6.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gtk-engine-unico-1.0.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * lxdm-0.4.1-17 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * qtcreator-2.6.0rc-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.13.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. dreisner - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] [REMINDER] systemd conversion
by Tom Gundersen 20 Oct '12

20 Oct '12

Hi guys, Thanks to everyone who converted their packages to use native systemd service files since my last email. There are stil 66 packages remaining in our TODO however (10 from extra and the rest from community): https://www.archlinux.org/todo/178/. It would be great if we can get the last few packages sorted so nothing is left out when systemd moves to base. It might be that some packages are pseudo-orphans (i.e., officially maintained, but not in practice), so those packages we should probably drop if no one adopts them. If you (for whatever reason) don't think you will be converting your packages in the near future, please let us know so we know which packages to focus on when we help out with the conversion. In particular those of you who have not converted any (or only a small percentage) of your packages [0], it would be helpful to know your intentions. Cheers, Tom [0]: cbrannon daenyth daniel jlichtblau romashka spupykin tpowa tredaelli

10 22

[aur-general] Delete request
by Vinycius Maia 20 Oct '12

20 Oct '12

Delete fortunes-br[1], is a duplicate of fortunes-mod-br[2] [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31482 [2]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34249

2 1

[aur-general] Remove request (xfce-utils-devel)
by 崔灏 (CUI Hao) 20 Oct '12

20 Oct '12

xfce-utils has been removed from latest Xfce. So please remove this package. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20772

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request
by Aaron Mueller 20 Oct '12

20 Oct '12

I found some old packages which are flaged out of date since a year and are orphaned. * (blender2.5a2) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37447 * (blender2.4-svn) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31983 * (blender2.4-bin) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39099 The current version of the "blender" package (2.64) is in the Community repository. The SVN version is in the "blender-svn" AUR package. I've watched this packages over a couple of months and contacted the maintainers. The packages are of no use anymore. The package * (blender2.6-bin) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=60652 seems obsolete through the official "blender" package. Are I am missing something? Aaron

2 1

Re: [aur-general] [arch-dev-public] Xorg-server 1.13/Mesa move to testing
by Andreas Radke 20 Oct '12

20 Oct '12

Xorg-xfs has been removed from our repos. The following driver rebuilds are still missing: sisimedia, unichrome. And I've received a report about broken -nv driver pkg not working with 1.13. Please help out to find fixes. -Andy

1 0