November 2012 - Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 12 Nov '12

12 Nov '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 8 packages missing signoffs * 6 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (8 total) == * catalyst-dkms-12.11-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-1 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * mplayer2-20121103-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-dkms-12.11-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mplayer2-20121103-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (6 total) == * catalyst-dkms-12.11-1 (i686), since 2012-10-25 * catalyst-dkms-12.11-1 (x86_64), since 2012-10-25 * catalyst-utils-12.11-1 (i686), since 2012-10-25 * catalyst-utils-12.11-1 (x86_64), since 2012-10-25 * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686), since 2012-10-28 * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64), since 2012-10-28 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 6 signoffs 2. stephane - 2 signoffs 3. heftig - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Delete Request
by Lucas Saliés Brum 11 Nov '12

11 Nov '12

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sds-window-list-git/ Upstream is dead. Thanks. -- Lucas Saliés Brum

2 1

[aur-general] Delete request
by Seven seven 11 Nov '12

11 Nov '12

Please delete https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/opera-mobile-emulator/(should be opera-mobile). Thanks.

2 1

[aur-general] Orphan request [Nov 11]
by Limao Luo 11 Nov '12

11 Nov '12

smaart has several out-of-date XFCE-related packages. No activity since May 2011 (no votes since 2009, but a couple of uploads since then), and smaart has had some recent packages orphaned due to inactivity. Therefore, I am requesting the orphaning of: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libxfcegui4-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/parole-media-player-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfburn-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfconf-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfdesktop-git/

2 1

[aur-general] Delete request
by Limao Luo 11 Nov '12

11 Nov '12

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libxfce4menu-git/ Replaced/superceded by garcon, and hasn't been updated in 2 years. The non-git version has already been deleted. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pyxfce-git/ Doesn't build, is dependent on libxfce4menu, and hasn't been updated in 3.5 years.

3 5

[aur-general] [RFC] New package: eclipse-stable
by Mateusz Loskot 11 Nov '12

11 Nov '12

Hi, I'm trying to package for Eclipse stable build based on stable integration builds [1]. There is eclipse-integration package, but wraps the Integration build type [1] which is a different thing. The package is based on the eclipse-integration package, similar PKGBUILD file and other scripts, similar structure. I'm looking for comments, does it look OK and ready for AUR submission? [1] http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/downloads/build_types.html [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/eclipse-integration/ Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net

1 0

[aur-general] Migrating name for python-{xlrd, xlwt, xlutils} before Py3 release
by Aaron DeVore 11 Nov '12

11 Nov '12

I maintain the packages for xlrd, xlwt, and xlutils in the AUR. The project behind them, python-excel, will probably release a Python 3 version within the next few months. Currently, each product has two packages with the prefix python-* and python2-*. Both point to a Python 2 version, but I will eventually move the python- packages to use Python 3. The python-* packages have a description that adds on something like "(Use python2-xlrd!)". Should I have the python-* packages deleted, then recreate them when a Python 3 version is released?

2 1

[aur-general] Request to delete golang-hg
by Johannes Löthberg 11 Nov '12

11 Nov '12

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 >> Hello, >> >> Could someone delete the golang-hg package? It's unmaintained >> (Last update was over a year ago) and there was already a go-hg >> package before it. >> > Sure, I merged it into go-hg. Thanks - -- Kindest Regards, Johannes Löthberg -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJQn24IAAoJEL52xETYSEXxAzcQAJYd7H/wnnjatHfUFAQLc4NJ VCVVt05RDZc1B8OXi7PN1/vnMb3p/5xDYj4p8BucDd2papnh+F/HUiwtPU5/2vxG 6hUYRkAyVvEqybjz1aNQlHk3SyT3tAqN/yN7TYwclmS9pJRGe419nlRh9oKIkWkS 33561b8sNLtc2ID3vnwdE0LPqFxoC1B61IErI9hJrDnhXoxzjg6hfnso2KVn6PaU At7YxHvNIQ9EfTQoXjQsLB1UV58tXrmZSRlSDb10vpsp5EiWjHhtOqyYVxBf14Uz qmjZcCCbbJ1Yq8bXuAVoS2tnCiX+yih86K/AXzGM9MdQ8Fl729S1/WUPgneU8L/1 iIFJPCs4XuoFIklD4L6he0OM78yQj4GGCjjxuoE1O+K3FBBoHSfQ7jMPyPtxGKeT L/da5lTgp/bptJX9Cx5eX4gbwUkmgwedoNRcR+sN7vU2B1QVlR+Faf0vyD7Z5FEa jLXVYwhp4yHr5tEqzdBTb4Ev2tGKqRcmFPs19pTOEWIqCUwaYOLvvBXuVt0Z60gY ZDEzK1ZgE9uSQAa95P1WstBRLDwK4n8lWhwap1xYlmsvhIyh9OOvlieJC4xTtjKj VM7rEvKMNthHwWt5SEdTyzr2Nf6KeB726pr4tgEPPUK4zoGXGXnq3UAAe5Qq8zBI /6wr/DWuNHpAPYfM5kwW =eAW8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 11 Nov '12

11 Nov '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 8 packages missing signoffs * 4 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (8 total) == * catalyst-dkms-12.11-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-1 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * mplayer2-20121103-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-dkms-12.11-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mplayer2-20121103-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (4 total) == * catalyst-dkms-12.11-1 (i686), since 2012-10-25 * catalyst-dkms-12.11-1 (x86_64), since 2012-10-25 * catalyst-utils-12.11-1 (i686), since 2012-10-25 * catalyst-utils-12.11-1 (x86_64), since 2012-10-25 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. heftig - 7 signoffs 2. lcarlier - 4 signoffs 3. dan - 2 signoffs 4. stephane - 1 signoffs 5. dreisner - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion request: fbrcapi
by Bjoern Franke 11 Nov '12

11 Nov '12

Hi, please delete fbrcapi[1]. Upstream is dead and the usual CAPI-module meanwhile is capable of TCP-connections. regards bjo [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fbrcapi/ -- xmpp bjo(a)schafweide.org bjo.nord-west.org | nord-west.org | freifunk-ol.de

2 1