February 2012 - Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 16 Feb '12

16 Feb '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 2 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686), since 2012-01-15 * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64), since 2012-01-16 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. foutrelis - 2 signoffs 2. allan - 2 signoffs 3. ibiru - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] for queueRAM -- about perForce software issues
by goodmenzy＠gmail.com 16 Feb '12

16 Feb '12

Hi, queueRAM, I found the p4/p4v packages in AUR were maintained by you. Here is something about them: (1) due to perforce.com do not provide version info in the download filename, the download file will alwayse failed to pass md5 checksum tesing whenever the company rebuild the software. Is there any way to ignore the md5sum? And the same silly solution of perforce caused that one can not download i686/x86_64 version on the same machine. Is there any method to rename the downloaded filename in the PKGBUILD script? does our makepkg tool support that feature? (2) If you are kind enough, will you please to integreated the pdf docs about that software into the pkg ? Thanks for your kindness for the maintances. --

3 4

[aur-general] joystick - request for removal
by Jozef Riha 16 Feb '12

16 Feb '12

please remove joystick pkgbuild: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48504 reason: linuxconsole (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55442) made this pkgbuild obsoleted thank you, jose

3 2

[aur-general] Package removal
by Mario St-Gelais 16 Feb '12

16 Feb '12

Pls remove adesklet-pacmansentry 0.0.6-2 (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18336). I was the maintainer of this package. The adesklet project is dead http://adesklets.sourceforge.net/index.html Mario

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request: mingw32-lcms1
by Schala Zeal 15 Feb '12

15 Feb '12

I've since renamed and resubmitted this as mingw32-lcms, and resubmitted version 2.3 as mingw32-lcms2. mingw32-lcms1 is no longer needed.

1 0

[aur-general] Removal request: aurorasim-git and tao-framework
by Schala Zeal 15 Feb '12

15 Feb '12

Please delete 'aurorasim-git' and 'tao-framework' AUR packages These packages are two of my mistakes. The first one, aurorasim-git, was submitted when I was still a newbie last summer and it was not tested before submission. Even after testing it a while later, it's broken and the Aurora-Sim project is very unkempt as it is so having this package isn't much use. The second one, 'tao-framework', works. However I discovered a little late that another package, 'taoframework' (no hyphen) already exists and seems to do a cleaner job of building and installation. Thank you for your understanding in this matter.

2 2

[aur-general] Adopt/orphan request: mingw32-gettext
by Schala Zeal 15 Feb '12

15 Feb '12

I would like to request mingw32-gettext be orphaned. The provided email address of the maintainer seems to be no longer valid, as sending a notice to him resulted in a failure delivery notice in my inbox, and mingw32-gettext, although up to date, is in need of PKGBUILD tweaking because the current configuration causes the build stage to fail. Thanks

2 2

[aur-general] Package removal request
by Smith Dhumbumroong 15 Feb '12

15 Feb '12

Hi, Please remove the following packages of mine: thailatex-svn: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28852 ttf-thai-latex: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=54664 ttf-thai-latex have been replaced by ttf-latex-tlwg and I no longer planned to maintain thailatex-svn. Thank you, Smith

2 2

[aur-general] Removal request: vulture-nethack
by Heiko Baums 15 Feb '12

15 Feb '12

The package vulture-nethack [1] doesn't run and can't be built anymore since the latest libpng update. The maintainer created a new package vulture [2] which is patched for the new libpng and installs the full upstream package containing the variants for nethack, slashem and unnethack, and orphaned vulture-nethack. So I guess the package vulture-nethack can be removed, and the votes be merged to vulture. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48815 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56625 Heiko

2 1

[aur-general] Remove request:airdrop-ng, airgraph-ng and aircrack-ptw
by 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) 15 Feb '12

15 Feb '12

airdrop-ng and airgraph-ng is duplicated with aircrack-ng-scripts in community. aircrack-ptw has been included into aircrack-ng since version 0.9, and the source link in PKGBUILD has down. airdrop-ng:https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41584 airgraph-ng:https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44546 aircrack-ptw:https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18331

2 1