March 2012 - Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] disowning a couple of packages
by Thomas Dziedzic 12 Jan '14

12 Jan '14

Hi, I'm disowning sage-mathematics, sage-mathematics-spkgs(optdepends for sage-mathematics), fityk, and xylib(dependency for fityk). I will move them to the aur in a week if no TU adopts them in community. If you plan on adopting sage-mathematics, you should know that it is currently unbuildable on archlinux, and some other newer distros due to how it is built. It is currently out of date, and you wont be able to update it without fixing this. http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10572 (13 month old bug without recent comments) http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11391 (9 month old bug I filed without a sign of activity) If you plan on adopting fityk, note that it needs a development version of wxwidgets which I statically build in the same PKGBUILD. Cheers.

6 12

[aur-general] Deletion Request
by Buce 29 Apr '12

29 Apr '12

Hi, After checking on an old packaged I disowned a while ago, it appears that pixelmap [1] no longer compiles. I think it broke when libpng was updated, and it doesn't look like upstream has kept pace with either libpng or minecraft development. Please delete it. Thanks in advance. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51081

4 9

[aur-general] Inactive for a few weeks
by Thorsten Töpper 14 Apr '12

14 Apr '12

Hello, I'll be (partly) inactive for a couple of weeks. Maybe I'll have some time to take care of some stuff yet that's not granted. I won't participate in any upcoming votes. As I won't check my mails everyday, answers to emails may also take a few days. Kind Regards Thorsten -- Jabber: atsutane(a)freethoughts.de Blog: http://atsutane.freethoughts.de/ Key: 295AFBF4 FP: 39F8 80E5 0E49 A4D1 1341 E8F9 39E4 F17F 295A FBF4

3 9

[aur-general] partial inactivity
by Sergej Pupykin 11 Apr '12

11 Apr '12

Hi, I have a business trip to Japan now, so I can do my work very slowly until March 8.

2 3

[aur-general] Inactive user tdy
by Cédric Girard 11 Apr '12

11 Apr '12

Hi, The user tdy [1] seems no longer active. He has 360 packages with 50 outdated. Last activity I've been able to spot is mid-2011. Could someone orphan all his packages for other people to adopt them. I have not contacted him but he is in cc of this email. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account.php?Action=AccountInfo&ID=11163 Regards, -- Cédric Girard

8 18

[aur-general] Removal request: virtualbox-sun
by Det 03 Apr '12

03 Apr '12

I guess this is a good summary of all the talk in virtualbox-sun's comment section[1]. The reality here is that virtualbox-bin[2] has evolved into something _at least_ as good as virtualbox-sun. While it's true that -sun is the original one it's also the one with the incorrect naming, a bit slower updates (by a day or so) and less votes (229 vs -bin's 3430). Because we can't justify keeping duplicated work around just to make everybody happy, one of them has to go. Even if -sun was to stay here the "better" stuff in -bin would have to be implemented there first before the removal and the renaming. When put together with the comment/vote merge it's starting to sound a bit pointless (taken how we can just remove that one). I know what I'd do but it's not my decision: it's yours. [1] virtualbox-sun = https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31996 [2] virtualbox-bin = https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51727 Det

5 9

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 31 Mar '12

31 Mar '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 17 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (17 total) == * avr-libc-1.8.0-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-back-0.22.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-base-1.24.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-gui-0.22.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * xbmc-11.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-back-0.22.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-base-1.24.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-gui-0.22.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * xbmc-11.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. dan - 7 signoffs 2. thomas - 2 signoffs 3. pierre - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 30 Mar '12

30 Mar '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 17 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (17 total) == * avr-libc-1.8.0-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-back-0.22.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-base-1.24.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-gui-0.22.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * xbmc-11.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-back-0.22.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-base-1.24.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-gui-0.22.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * xbmc-11.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. stephane - 3 signoffs 2. dan - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Cleanup
by Michael Düll 29 Mar '12

29 Mar '12

Hi everybody! Can someone please delete my old packages in AUR? - aacgain[1] (superseeded by aacgain-cvs[2], as there's no more support for tarballs upstream). - bitcoin-noforcedfee[3] (not needed anymore). Thank you everyone =) akurei [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=4560 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41445 [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=53209

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 29 Mar '12

29 Mar '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 17 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * xbmc-11.0-2 (i686) * xbmc-11.0-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (17 total) == * avr-libc-1.8.0-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-back-0.22.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-base-1.24.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-gui-0.22.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * xbmc-11.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-back-0.22.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-base-1.24.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-gui-0.22.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * xbmc-11.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. dan - 5 signoffs 2. stephane - 2 signoffs 3. allan - 2 signoffs 4. mtorromeo - 2 signoffs

1 0