July 2012 - Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 14 Jul '12

14 Jul '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 1 fully signed off package * 25 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (25 total) == * dkms-2.2.0.3-8 (any) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-23 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-13 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * oss-4.2_2006-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.031.00-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rsyslog-6.2.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-9 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-4.1.18-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.1.18-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-23 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * oss-4.2_2006-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.031.00-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rsyslog-6.2.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-4.1.18-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.1.18-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Completed signoffs (1 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120704-1 (any) == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bisson - 11 signoffs 2. lcarlier - 7 signoffs 3. bluewind - 5 signoffs 4. stephane - 2 signoffs 5. allan - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion request
by Mauro Santos 13 Jul '12

13 Jul '12

In anticipation of the final /lib move please remove [1] because it doesn't build anymore with recent kernels and soon the module will be installed to the wrong place. If possible merge the votes into [2] as it includes code fixes to build cleanly on recent kernels and a few more supported pid:vid combinations. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51225 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58148 -- Mauro Santos

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 13 Jul '12

13 Jul '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 1 fully signed off package * 25 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (25 total) == * dkms-2.2.0.3-8 (any) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-23 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-13 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * oss-4.2_2006-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.031.00-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rsyslog-6.2.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-9 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-4.1.18-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.1.18-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-23 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * oss-4.2_2006-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.031.00-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rsyslog-6.2.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-4.1.18-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.1.18-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Completed signoffs (1 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120704-1 (any) == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. stephane - 14 signoffs 2. thomas - 14 signoffs 3. idevolder - 3 signoffs 4. dan - 2 signoffs 5. tomegun - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Installing aftershotpro with lib32-libpng12 and dependencies
by Mateusz Loskot 12 Jul '12

12 Jul '12

Hi, I'm running current Arch 64-bit and I'm trying to install the AfterShot Pro [0] using aftershotpro 1.0.1.10-1 [1] First obstacle is this: $ makepkg -s ==> Making package: aftershotpro 1.0.1.10-1 (Thu Jul 12 20:42:48 BST 2012) ==> Checking runtime dependencies... ==> Installing missing dependencies... error: target not found: lib32-libpng12 ==> ERROR: 'pacman' failed to install missing dependencies. The Dependencies section on the package page [1] does not list lib32-libpng12 but libpng12 only. So, searching for lib32-libpng12 [2], but attempt to install it results in this: $ makepkg -s ==> Making package: lib32-libpng12 1.2.49-1 (Thu Jul 12 20:45:54 BST 2012) ==> Checking runtime dependencies... ==> Checking buildtime dependencies... ==> Installing missing dependencies... resolving dependencies... looking for inter-conflicts... :: gcc-libs-multilib and gcc-libs are in conflict. Remove gcc-libs? [y/N] error: unresolvable package conflicts detected error: failed to prepare transaction (conflicting dependencies) :: gcc-libs-multilib and gcc-libs are in conflict ==> ERROR: 'pacman' failed to install missing dependencies. Does anyone know how to get around it? The package aftershotpro 1.0.1.10-1 is 32-bit installs 32-bit version of the software from AfterShotPro_i386.rpm, but there is package for Linux Debian (64-bit) available [3]. I wonder if the maintainer could update the package using the 64-bit deb. [0] http://www.corel.com/corel/product/index.jsp?pid=prod4670071 [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55712 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34264 [3] http://apps.corel.com/lp/aftershot/download/index.html Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net

2 2

[aur-general] Delete request: corel-aftershot-pro 1-1
by Mateusz Loskot 12 Jul '12

12 Jul '12

Hi, The package can be removed, as explained in the comment: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56948 Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net

2 1

[aur-general] [Orphan request] Eclipse-egit
by Alexandre Ferrando 12 Jul '12

12 Jul '12

The eclipse-egit package [ 0 ] is out-of-date and the maintainer said in the comments of the package almost a week ago that he's not going to update it. However he has not orphaned it so it can't be updated by another user. In this situation I ask about orphaning the package. Thank you in advance. Alex Ferrando [ 0 ] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=53429

2 1

[aur-general] Package Deletion Requests (rtmpdump-yle & asp)
by Jason St. John 12 Jul '12

12 Jul '12

Hello, Please delete rtmpdump-yle[1] because the maintainer of the package made the following comment: "THIS PACKAGE IS DEPRECATED!!!!! DO NOT USE THIS!!!!! You need to install the new yle-dl package from AUR, which will work with the new Areena." Please delete asp[2] because the package is very old (from 2006), links to some Sun thing which is now owned by Oracle, and the source link is broken and doesn't even use DNS. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29792 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=5896 Thanks

3 2

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 12 Jul '12

12 Jul '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 1 fully signed off package * 25 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (25 total) == * dkms-2.2.0.3-8 (any) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-23 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-13 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * oss-4.2_2006-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.031.00-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rsyslog-6.2.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-9 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-4.1.18-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.1.18-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-23 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-2012.05.21-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * oss-4.2_2006-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.031.00-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.031.00-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rsyslog-6.2.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-4.1.18-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.18-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.1.18-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Completed signoffs (1 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120704-1 (any) == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 5 signoffs 2. tomegun - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion request
by Linus Arver 12 Jul '12

12 Jul '12

Hello, Please remove 'undo-tree' (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48977), as it is a duplicate of the new/improved 'emacs-undo-tree' (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=60708). I actually own both packages (I just adopted 'undo-tree' today), and while I could have simply upgraded the 'undo-tree' package, I thought this would be a good time to get the naming right. Please forward me your response as I am not subscribed to this list. -Linus

2 1

[aur-general] Orphan request
by Hugo Osvaldo Barrera 11 Jul '12

11 Jul '12

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, opensmtpd [1] seems to be abandoned. I marked it out of date, and left the author some tips on how to improve the PKGBUILD over a month ago, and there hasn't been any activity since. I was wondering if this could be orphaned so I can adopt it and maintain it myself. Thanks, [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50709 - -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJP/NAjAAoJEIc88gcb++1EMswIAIpTwF0bdDcs/sywK528hemI I4Vju+Y5Z4MFWtzzntSRFvuTifG2+HQ9rpC22R4OgUt83TysSnFZEX9ZPyIV4sYA wR23RTQ1FV5dEfYFI0pq2f4Uc/occxPuj86e/ZDvphYO7/fzulWSCutOg39+IKcW D9qRYpFpmfPL85eIGz+JIyUKGiMQh5XK9rNNN53t+alnl5h+Zqvh85yIlXg6Sa47 rQGDj5HOMZXeMfSm8evB9OFs+hGFiIn9cofAn1Oh5zdZaePHtDFaVnPiDGIbzVX9 cFl/WLvMsaSlHA9QTrFvkmphWtzS87Qdm8B9PhoS3QCSMCMhIQbCFA4iNKoUEXg= =oQYQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 2