September 2012 - Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 24 Sep '12

24 Sep '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 4 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 8 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (4 total) == * catalyst-12.8-0.1 (i686) * catalyst-utils-12.8-0.2 (i686) * catalyst-12.8-0.1 (x86_64) * catalyst-utils-12.8-0.2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (4 total) == * catfish-0.4.0.2-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * systemd-arch-units-20120915-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * qtcreator-2.6.0beta-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * qtcreator-2.6.0beta-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (4 total) == * catalyst-12.8-0.1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.8-0.2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-12.8-0.1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.8-0.2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. ttopper - 3 signoffs 2. allan - 3 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion request
by foalsrock 24 Sep '12

24 Sep '12

Hello, I'm the maintainer for the gnome-shell-theme-gsmall package [1], the source files have been removed and the theme seems discontinued. I'd like to have the package deleted. Thanks [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52012

2 1

[aur-general] What happened to mnogosearch?
by Karol Blazewicz 23 Sep '12

23 Sep '12

https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1165219

4 3

[aur-general] Deletion and merge requests
by Stefan Husmann 23 Sep '12

23 Sep '12

Hello, some orphaned packages should IMHO be deleted. latexmk [1] is included in texlive-core. scribus-rc [2] is older than the version of scribus in [extra]. emacs-muse-git [3] is exactly the same as in the community-package, because since 3.20 there was no git commit. The package libertine-legacy-texmf is abandoned upstream, and (working) successors are on their way to CTAN. So please merge [4] into [5]. Thanks. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29609 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48338 [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/em/emacs-muse-git/PKGBUILD [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55167 [5] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=63066

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request
by rafael ff1 23 Sep '12

23 Sep '12

Here is a Sunday cleanup: lib32-bluez https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33368 - abandoned, orphan, useless lib32-bug-buddy https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19085 - abandoned, orphan, useless lib32-fst-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32093 - abandoned, was never build-able lib32-flashplugin10.1 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49982 - Seems useless lib32-jre https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42677 - Source no longer available, maintainer won't fix lib32-jdk https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11615 - Source no longer available, maintainer won't fix lib32-glew1.5 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50570 - I made it, but it's no longer needed by any package glew1.5 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50571 - I made it, but it's no longer needed by any package Thanks, Rafael

3 4

Re: [aur-general] Moving sbt to [extra]
by Andrea Scarpino 23 Sep '12

23 Sep '12

On Sunday 23 September 2012 11:11:02 you wrote: > Hi devs, > I've to work with sbt for a while and I guess it deserve a place in our > repos. So, I'm going to move it to [extra] (if this is an issue, I'm ok > with [community] too). I moved sbt to [community] since scala is there too. Note, this was the simple-build-tool package in AUR, not the sbt one. Both have been deleted now. Cheers. -- Andrea

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion request
by Milos Dukic 23 Sep '12

23 Sep '12

Please delete this package [1]. PKGBUILD does nothing. Uploader probably thought this would be funny. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=63063

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 23 Sep '12

23 Sep '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 4 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (4 total) == * catfish-0.4.0.2-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * systemd-arch-units-20120915-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * qtcreator-2.6.0beta-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * qtcreator-2.6.0beta-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. stephane - 4 signoffs 2. bisson - 2 signoffs 3. stativ - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Please orphan choqok-git
by Michael Düll 22 Sep '12

22 Sep '12

Hallo! Please orphan choqok-git [1]. The Maintainer last updated this PKGBUILD on March 2011 and a complaint by AHoneybun on Sun, 17 Jun 2012 is still unanswered. He is also unreachable by mail: When I try to email him, I get: <Roozbeh(a)Roozbeh.us>: host mail.Roozbeh.us[69.172.134.138] said: 550 sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.7.17) (in reply to RCPT TO command) His second email address (me(a)slashrosa.org) also does not work, because the domain slashroas.org is unregistered. $ whois slashrosa.org NOT FOUND I created a fixed PKGBUILD and would like to adopt the package. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42654

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: pdfpres-git
by Peter Hofmann 22 Sep '12

22 Sep '12

Hi, please delete pdfpres-git: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=53747 I'm the maintainer of that package and the original author of pdfpres. pdfpres is no longer developed because it has been superseded by another program. Thanks!

2 1