=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 10 packages missing signoffs
* 8 packages older than 14 days
(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)
== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (8 total) ==
* blender-6:2.65a-3 (i686)
1/2 signoffs
* boinc-7.0.44-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* fcron-3.1.1-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* openimageio-1.1.2-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* blender-6:2.65a-3 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs
* boinc-7.0.44-2 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs
* fcron-3.1.1-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* openimageio-1.1.2-1 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs
== Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) ==
* openshadinglanguage-1.2.1-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* openshadinglanguage-1.2.1-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
== All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (8 total) ==
* openshadinglanguage-1.2.1-1 (i686), since 2013-01-03
* openshadinglanguage-1.2.1-1 (x86_64), since 2013-01-03
* openimageio-1.1.2-1 (i686), since 2013-01-03
* openimageio-1.1.2-1 (x86_64), since 2013-01-03
* blender-6:2.65a-3 (i686), since 2013-01-03
* blender-6:2.65a-3 (x86_64), since 2013-01-03
* fcron-3.1.1-1 (i686), since 2013-01-03
* fcron-3.1.1-1 (x86_64), since 2013-01-03
== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==
I am unable to reach the author (mail server seems broken) so I'm not
really sure what to do about the 2 weeks limit.
Also I have a up-to-date PKGBUILD ready.
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 12 packages missing signoffs
* 10 packages older than 14 days
(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)
== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (10 total) ==
* blender-6:2.65a-3 (i686)
1/2 signoffs
* boinc-7.0.44-2 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* fcron-3.1.1-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* openimageio-1.1.2-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* virtualbox-modules-lts-4.2.6-4 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* blender-6:2.65a-3 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs
* boinc-7.0.44-2 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs
* fcron-3.1.1-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* openimageio-1.1.2-1 (x86_64)
1/2 signoffs
* virtualbox-modules-lts-4.2.6-4 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
== Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) ==
* openshadinglanguage-1.2.1-1 (i686)
0/2 signoffs
* openshadinglanguage-1.2.1-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
== All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (10 total) ==
* virtualbox-modules-lts-4.2.6-4 (x86_64), since 2012-12-25
* virtualbox-modules-lts-4.2.6-4 (i686), since 2012-12-25
* openshadinglanguage-1.2.1-1 (i686), since 2013-01-03
* openshadinglanguage-1.2.1-1 (x86_64), since 2013-01-03
* openimageio-1.1.2-1 (i686), since 2013-01-03
* openimageio-1.1.2-1 (x86_64), since 2013-01-03
* blender-6:2.65a-3 (i686), since 2013-01-03
* blender-6:2.65a-3 (x86_64), since 2013-01-03
* fcron-3.1.1-1 (i686), since 2013-01-03
* fcron-3.1.1-1 (x86_64), since 2013-01-03
== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==
1. eric - 11 signoffs
2. thomas - 6 signoffs
3. foutrelis - 5 signoffs
4. dan - 2 signoffs
The source for android-mips-system-image-13 is no
longer available upstream. What is usually done for cases like this? If the
answer is removal form the AUR then please do so TUs.
Regards,
Joel Pedraza
Hi,
Could you merge higan [1] into higan-gtk [2]. I've made separate PKGBUILDs
for GTK and QT, instead of only one split PKGBUILD.
Thx in advance!
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/higan/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/higan-gtk/
--
Alucryd
"In the name of God, impure souls of the living dead shall be banished into
eternal damnation. Amen."
Hi,
I'm the maintainer of the following AUR package :
name : lnxstack
url : https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lnxstack/
I request for its delection because the program
has been renamed to "lxnstack" and i sent a new
package with the correct information:
new name : lxnstack
new url : https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lxnstack/
Thank you, in advance, for your time.
Best regards,
Maurizio D'Addona