=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 8 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days
(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)
== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (8 total) ==
* libpinyin-0.9.93-3 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* libtaginfo-0.1.6-2 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* mailman-2.1.16-1 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* wvstreams-4.6.1-7 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* libpinyin-0.9.93-3 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* libtaginfo-0.1.6-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* mailman-2.1.16-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* wvstreams-4.6.1-7 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==
1. thomas - 5 signoffs
2. allan - 2 signoffs
I'm the new maintainer of the package: wxpython
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wxpython-2.4.9.1/
This package should be renamed from "wxpython-2.4.9.1" to
"wxpython-updates" since its the development version of wxpython and
submitting a new package for each version would not be ideal.
Also, i mistakenly submitted a new package trying to update wxpython to
a new version which should be deleted.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wxpython2.9.5.0/
Best Regards,
Ronnie Andrew
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 8 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days
(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)
== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (8 total) ==
* libpinyin-0.9.93-3 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* libtaginfo-0.1.6-2 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* mailman-2.1.16-1 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* wvstreams-4.6.1-7 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* libpinyin-0.9.93-3 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* libtaginfo-0.1.6-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* mailman-2.1.16-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* wvstreams-4.6.1-7 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==
1. tpowa - 4 signoffs
There's an issue that needs fixing in
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/graphicsmagick-imagemagick-compat/
but the maintainer has a lavabit email address, so I can't contact them. Their lack of AUR activity and fact they have other flagged packages seems to suggest they wouldn't check back to notice any comments on packages, so please can you disown it so I can fix it?
--
Simon Hollingshead
simon.hollingshead(a)gmail.com
Hi,
I recently got several requests to include armv7h in arch() of my
PKGBUILDs, is it okay to do it even though it's not officially supported?
Cheers,
Kuba
I'm the creator & mainter for python-sleekxmpp-git :
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-sleekxmpp-git/
And I think it should be merged with python-sleekxmpp-devel :
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-sleekxmpp-devel/
Not sure why I created a new package, as the -devel, despite being
misnamed, is pretty much the same thing I submitted about about a year
later. I will request a few changes to the PKGBUILD once the merge
happens, including, perhaps, resubmitting it as -git
--
Jonathan Arnold Webstream: http://hieronymus.soup.io
If you want to go fast, go alone. If you want to go far, you
need a team ~ John Wooden
Hi,
please disown haskell-platform:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/haskell-platform/
The package has been flagged out-of-date on 2012-11-06 and has not been
updated by the maintainer since.
Thanks,
Daniel