please merge r-rgl [0] into r-cran-rgl [1], as the latter follows the
common naming scheme and is up to date.
about name scheming: there seem to be 2 groups of naming. r-<name> and
r-cran-<name>. obviously i prefer the latter (try searching cran in
aur). is it ok to update and rename to that naming scheme?
thanks
[0] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/r-rgl/
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/r-cran-rgl/
Breaking away from an IRC convo from this morning; has support for
remote sums been considered for pacman?
It's currently possible to do this for .sig files (through the source
array), but not available for simple sha/md5 hashes. This would let
packagers do something like:
source=("http://example.com/downloads/$pkgname-$pkgver.tar.xz")
sha1sums=("http://example.com/downloads/$pkgname-$pkgver.tar.xz.sha1")
(Of course, only for servers that generate a programmatically
discoverable hash of some sort; but it's not actually uncommon)
J. Leclanche
Hello,
I'm not sure which is a better package name as there seems to be no
dominating convention in the AUR, so I will leave that decision up to
the TUs.
Please do one of the following:
--- merge vim-solarized-git into vim-colors-solarized-git
--- have the package maintainer update vim-solarized-git and delete
vim-colors-solarized-git
I've CC'd the maintainer of both packages.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vim-solarized-git/https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vim-colors-solarized-git/
Thanks