On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Levente Polyak
<arch(a)leventepolyak.net> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> please merge smali2 [1] into smali [2]
>
> smali was marked out-of-date some time ago and not maintained, in the
> meanwhile Fernando (Firef0x) submitted smali2 with a recent version.
> As smali got disowned yesterday, i adopted it and updated it to 2.0
> after speaking to JesusFreke (the author of smali, who pointed out
> that 1.4 is a dead end).
> After also speaking to Fernando (smali2 submitter) we agreed that
> smali2 got obsolete and he disowned slami2.
>
> kind regards,
> Levente
>
> [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/smali2/
> [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/smali/
>
Merged, thx.
--
Maxime
Hi,
six weeks ago, i asked for advise how to deal with the
outdated AUR package of my program xorriso, which overwrites
the executables of the properly maintained package
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/?name=libisoburn
On advise of this list, i later posted comments to
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xorriso/https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xorriso-tcltk/
which received no reply and did not cause any activity.
A month ago i wrote to the published mail address of the
maintainer "dreieck". No reaction since then.
What can i do to instigate the resolution of this mess ?
Meanwhile the AUR package "xorriso" overwrites the current
"libisoburn" version xorriso-1.3.2 by a xorriso version,
which is three releases and 8 months older. Between both
releases there happened 13 bug fixes.
Have a nice day :)
Thomas
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 2 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 4 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days
(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)
== New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) ==
* mailman-2.1.16-1 (i686)
* mailman-2.1.16-1 (x86_64)
== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) ==
* mailman-2.1.16-1 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* mailman-2.1.16-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
== Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) ==
* xmind-3.3.1-2 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* xmind-3.3.1-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==
1. allan - 28 signoffs
2. pierre - 8 signoffs
3. bisson - 2 signoffs
4. thomas - 1 signoffs
Hello all,
please merge smali2 [1] into smali [2]
smali was marked out-of-date some time ago and not maintained, in the
meanwhile Fernando (Firef0x) submitted smali2 with a recent version. As
smali got disowned yesterday, i adopted it and updated it to 2.0 after
speaking to JesusFreke (the author of smali, who pointed out that 1.4 is
a dead end).
After also speaking to Fernando (smali2 submitter) we agreed that
smali2 got obsolete and he disowned slami2.
kind regards,
Levente
[1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/smali2/
[2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/smali/
The split pkg 'backintime' provides the same binaries as
'backintime-kde4' rendering the later redundant. I checked with the
current maintainer of 'backintime-kde4' and he/she agrees. This
request is to delete
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/backintime-kde4
Please cc my on any reply as I am not subscribed.
Thanks,
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 2 packages missing signoffs
* 0 packages older than 14 days
(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)
== Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) ==
* xmind-3.3.1-2 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* xmind-3.3.1-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==
1. eric - 3 signoffs
2. pierre - 2 signoffs
3. bpiotrowski - 1 signoffs
Hi,
I would like to disown package kfaenza-icon-them from maintainer JokerBoy.
He has not responded to comments on the AUR page (
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kfaenza-icon-theme/) and it doesn't build
Thank you,
Daniele Formichelli