November 2013 - Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 29 Nov '13

29 Nov '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 11 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (11 total) == * goagent-3.0.8-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avrdude-6.0.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * boinc-7.2.33-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * flashrom-0.9.7-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * openocd-0.7.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python2-gevent-1.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * avrdude-6.0.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * boinc-7.2.33-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * flashrom-0.9.7-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * openocd-0.7.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python2-gevent-1.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 2 signoffs 2. bisson - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Fwd: gnupg-largekeys in AUR
by Ido Rosen 28 Nov '13

28 Nov '13

Hi, I've added gnupg-largekeys, which is the gnupg from Core, but patched to extend the maximum key size to 65535 bits. Please note that unpatched versions of gnupg can only import/encrypt to/verify signatures of key sizes up to 16384 bits large, so you could keep your key sizes less than or equal to that size for compatibility. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnupg-largekeys I think gnupg2-large-keys.patch would be a great addition into the Arch Core gnupg package, if not in its current form then at least modifying it to increase the max key size to 16384 instead of 65535. For some interesting numbers, take a look at http://www.ecrypt.eu.org/documents/D.SPA.20.pdf (especially Table 7.2, see 15424 bit RSA keys). Basically, it'd be nice for users to be able to create keys larger than 4096 bits. Cheers, Ido

2 5

[aur-general] Delete egoboo-data
by SanskritFritz 28 Nov '13

28 Nov '13

Hi, please remove the package egoboo-data [1] because I have merged it into the egoboo package, so it is not needed anymore. I'm the maintainer of both packages. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/egoboo-data/ Thank you.

2 1

Re: [aur-general] PKG rename request!
by Xyne 28 Nov '13

28 Nov '13

Michael Düll wrote: >Hi! > >I reuploaded my package from enigmail-bin[1] to >thunderbird-enigmail-bin[2] as requested. Please merge into the new one [2]. > >[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/enigmail-bin/ >[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/thunderbird-enigmail-bin/ > done, thanks

1 0

[aur-general] PKG rename request
by Michael Düll 28 Nov '13

28 Nov '13

Hi! I reuploaded my package from enigmail-bin[1] to thunderbird-enigmail-bin[2] as requested. Please merge into the new one [2]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/enigmail-bin/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/thunderbird-enigmail-bin/

1 0

[aur-general] Package deletions
by Leo Unbekandt 28 Nov '13

28 Nov '13

Good afternoon everyone, I was maintainer of - bin32-hubic - bin64-hubic These are proprietary clients of the cloud storage service of OVH. However the client has completely changed and this package are not useful anymore. The replacement is already on AUR, it's the package: `hubic` Is it possible to delete the old ones ? Thank you ! -- Léo Unbekandt Soulon on Gitub/Twitter/Freenode CTO @ Appsdeck

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 28 Nov '13

28 Nov '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 11 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (11 total) == * goagent-3.0.8-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avrdude-6.0.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * boinc-7.2.33-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * flashrom-0.9.7-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * openocd-0.7.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python2-gevent-1.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * avrdude-6.0.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * boinc-7.2.33-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * flashrom-0.9.7-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * openocd-0.7.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python2-gevent-1.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. thomas - 2 signoffs 2. djgera - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Merge request: spark-git / sparklines-git
by Jerome Leclanche 28 Nov '13

28 Nov '13

spark-git currently conflicts with the spark im client. Short of renaming the other one "spark-im", I've submitted a proposal for sparklines-git instead. I also renamed the binary itself sparklines so not to create a conflict with the spark im client (whose binary is also called spark). https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/spark-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sparklines-git/ J. Leclanche

1 0

[aur-general] remove fusion-icon-fixed
by Pantelis Panayiotou 27 Nov '13

27 Nov '13

Hello, I'm the maintainer of fusion-icon-fixed. It needs to be removed because it's a duplicate of fusion-icon. Thank you. -- Pantelis Panayiotou Operations Manager, Miliaris Limited Louki Akrita & Evanthous 2, Office 102, 1101 Nicosia Email: info(a)miliaris.eu | Web: www.miliaris.eu | Tel: 99.020.770 -- Pantelis Panayiotou - p.panayiotou(a)gmail.com This email is signed with an S/MIME digital signature, using a certificate issued by COMODO. I first used this certificate on 2013-01-09 10:50 EET. Please contact me if you need assistance verifying my digital signature.

1 0

[aur-general] question about git package as a dependency
by Lieven Moors 27 Nov '13

27 Nov '13

Hi, I was wondering if it would be ok to let my package (non-daw-git) depend on the ntk-git package instead of ntk. The package ntk is not yet available in AUR, but ntk-git is. I think technically, ntk-git should provide ntk, and non-daw-git should depend on some git-release of ntk. The downside for the user is that helpers like yaourt won't find the dependency. I was wondering what you guys think about this... Greetings, lieven

3 6