August 2013 - Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Removal request: lmms-vst
by Martti Kühne 24 Aug '13

24 Aug '13

Hi list There's no point in having [0] around, since community/lmms passes -USE=vst to compilation... cheers! mar77i [0] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lmms-vst

2 1

[aur-general] Merging request.
by Jagmjp Janpgm 24 Aug '13

24 Aug '13

Could elementary-icons-bzr be merged into elementary-icon-theme-bzr to be in sync with elementary-icon-theme from [community] ?

4 4

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 24 Aug '13

24 Aug '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 1 fully signed off package * 21 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * fcitx-mozc-1.11.1502.102-1 (i686) * fcitx-mozc-1.11.1502.102-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (21 total) == * bbswitch-0.7-11 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * devil-1.7.8-17 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * fcitx-mozc-1.11.1502.102-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mplayer-vaapi-36265-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-8 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-41 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * synfig-0.64.0-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-32 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-11 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.16-8 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.7-11 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * devil-1.7.8-17 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fcitx-mozc-1.11.1502.102-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mplayer-vaapi-36265-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * netsurf-3.0-4 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-8 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-41 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * synfig-0.64.0-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-32 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-11 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.16-8 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Completed signoffs (1 total) == * netsurf-3.0-4 (i686) == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. eric - 9 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Removal of AUR packages brother-mfc260c-lpr and brother-mfc260c-cupswrapper
by Tobias Böhm 23 Aug '13

23 Aug '13

Hello, today I have installed drivers for the Brother MFC260C and found two packages which might be worth to be removed. The two packages are: brother-mfc260c-lpr https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-mfc260c-lpr/ brother-mfc260c-cupswrapper https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-mfc260c-cupswrapper/ The reasons are that both of this packages are currently not working, as the source url is not working any more. Both packages are orphaned as well. Additionally there is a working package which provides both drivers, thus supersedes the two mentioned ones: brother-mfc-260c https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-mfc-260c/ Thank you for your efforts. Best Regards, Tobias

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request: kdeplasma-applets-qstardict
by A Rojas 23 Aug '13

23 Aug '13

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kdeplasma-applets-qstardict/ It is in [community] now

2 1

[aur-general] Disown request : python2-logbook
by Laël Guillemenot 23 Aug '13

23 Aug '13

Please disown python2-logbook https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-logbook/ The package is mark as out-of-date since 2012-11-17. No response of maintainer to mail I had send two weeks ago.

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 23 Aug '13

23 Aug '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 1 fully signed off package * 19 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (19 total) == * bbswitch-0.7-11 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * devil-1.7.8-17 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mplayer-vaapi-36265-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-8 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-41 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * synfig-0.64.0-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-32 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-11 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.16-8 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.7-11 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * devil-1.7.8-17 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mplayer-vaapi-36265-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * netsurf-3.0-4 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-8 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-41 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * synfig-0.64.0-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-32 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-11 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.16-8 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Completed signoffs (1 total) == * netsurf-3.0-4 (i686) == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. andyrtr - 6 signoffs 2. allan - 5 signoffs 3. lcarlier - 4 signoffs 4. jsteel - 2 signoffs 5. heftig - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] [tu-bylaws][PATCH]
by Xyne 22 Aug '13

22 Aug '13

Hi, Here's a patch for the TU-bylaws that resulted from discussion in the previous thread: https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2013-August/024745.html I hope this is in the correct format. I haven't used git send-email because I still haven't configured it and didn't want to risk doing something stupid in a hurry. For those of you who prefer reading the resulting document, I have attached the source file and the generated HTML file. Please read through the previous thread for an explanation of the changes. Let the discussion period begin! From 8328526fc0fef469d9edb1abf0f0448c2f440e90 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Xyne <xyne(a)archlinux.ca> Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 13:55:37 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Following discussion on aur-general (https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2013-August/024745.html) * remove distinction between "active" and "inactive" TUs * update all clauses affected by this change, most importantly the definition of quorum * update conditions for special removal of a TU * use abbreviations consistently through the document * add missing links to instances of "aur-general" * various changes to correct or improve English throughout the document --- tu-bylaws.txt | 122 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------------- 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-) diff --git a/tu-bylaws.txt b/tu-bylaws.txt index 991d683..4c0699b 100644 --- a/tu-bylaws.txt +++ b/tu-bylaws.txt @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ Trusted User Bylaws =================== Trusted Users <aur-general(a)archlinux.org> -1.2, 18 January 2011 +1.3, 2013-08-07 Summary ------- @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ duties. Mission ------- -The Trusted Users serve the following purposes: +The Trusted Users (TUs) serve the following purposes: 1. Maintain +[community]+ as an intermediary between Archlinux's official repositories and the +unsupported+ package collection in the AUR. @@ -22,10 +22,10 @@ repositories and the +unsupported+ package collection in the AUR. Bylaws ------ -The bylaws are written to be consistent with the mission of the Trusted Users, -and to ensure that Trusted Users continue to be *Trusted* in the future. They -are also written with the intent to keep the Trusted User organization a -thriving one, fulfilling their purpose. +The bylaws are written to be consistent with the mission of the TUs, +and to ensure that TUs continue to be *Trusted* in the future. They +are also written with the intent to keep the TU organization a +thriving one, fulfilling its purpose. Standard Voting Procedure ------------------------- @@ -35,31 +35,23 @@ accept or reject proposals regarding TU affairs. SVP begins with a proposal, for example the addition of a TU or an amendment to the bylaws. The proposal should be clear and concise and it must be posted on -the aur-general mailing list (aur-general). The proposal must also be worded +the https://mailman.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aur-general[aur-general mailing list] (aur-general). The proposal must also be worded unambiguously, and such that a YES or NO answer may be given. -The discussion period begins when the proposal is posted on aur-general. The +The discussion period begins when the proposal is posted on https://mailman.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aur-general[aur-general]. The duration of the discussion period shall be 5 full days UNLESS otherwise stated in a section of the bylaws pertaining to the proposal. Official discussion -shall take place on aur-general. During the discussion period, votes shall not +shall take place on https://mailman.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aur-general[aur-general]. During the discussion period, votes shall not be cast. The voting period begins when the discussion period ends. The duration of the voting period shall be 7 full days UNLESS otherwise stated in a section of the bylaws pertaining to the proposal. During the voting period, TUs may vote YES, -NO or ABSTAIN. Votes shall be cast under the Trusted User section of the AUR -homepage. At the end of the voting period, all votes shall be tallied. - -In the context of SVP, TUs are considered active if they are marked as active -when the voting period ends. - -Quorum shall be 66% of all active TUs and participation shall be measured by -the sum of YES, NO and ABSTAIN votes, UNLESS otherwise stated in a section of -the bylaws pertaining to the proposal. +NO or ABSTAIN. Votes shall be cast under the Trusted User section of the https://aur.archlinux.org/[AUR website]. At the end of the voting period, all votes shall be tallied. The proposal is accepted if EITHER -1. the number of YES votes is greater than half the number of active TUs OR +1. the number of YES votes is greater than half the number of TUs OR 2. quorum has been established and the number of YES votes is greater than the number of NO votes @@ -68,8 +60,7 @@ UNLESS otherwise stated in a section of the bylaws pertaining to the proposal. The proposal is rejected if EITHER -1. the number of NO votes is greater than or equal to half the number of active -TUs OR +1. the number of NO votes is greater than or equal to half the number of TUs OR 2. quorum was established and the number of NO votes is greater than or equal to the number of YES votes @@ -90,47 +81,20 @@ second SVP then it shall be rejected. Quorum ------ -This section deals with quorums, and the consequences for those that repeatedly -keep the group from meeting them. - -Quorums were established to make sure that all TUs are having a say in the -matters that they vote on, and to ensure that TUs remain active in the job that -they have taken on. All active TUs should be participating in discussions and -voting procedures in order to continue meeting the quorums. For this reason, -active TUs that keep quorum from being established on a voting procedure for -three consecutive voting procedures (they need not be on the same motion) are -automatically brought up for removal procedure, by reason of unwarranted -inactivity. - -Active vs. Inactive -------------------- - -A Trusted User will have an activity status at all times. Only two statuses -exist, +active+, and +inactive+. A TU should remain active whenever possible, -and avoid being inactive, especially without declaring it. - -An active TU participates in all TU tasks and activities normally. - -A TU may declare themselves inactive, for instance if they are going on -vacation, by sending a message to -https://mailman.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aur-general[aur-general]. TUs -are expected to step down altogether if they plan on becoming inactive for a -period longer than 2 months. It is expected that while inactive, a TU is -unable to maintain packages and partake in normal TU activities. They are -exempt from quorums and in fact cannot vote. A TU becomes active again at the -stated date on their original inactivity declaration, or when they declare -themselves such. +Quorums were established to ensure that all matters decided by vote are +representative of the TU group. All TUs are expected to participate in all votes +and the preceding discussions whenever possible. -If a TU becomes inactive without declaring it, "disappears", someone must -motion for their removal for reason of unwarranted and undeclared inactivity, -and the normal procedure for the motion is followed. +Quorum shall be 66% of all TUs and participation shall be measured by +the sum of YES, NO and ABSTAIN votes, UNLESS otherwise stated in a section of +the bylaws pertaining to the proposal. Addition of a TU ---------------- -The addition of a Trusted User may occur at any time. +The addition of a TU may occur at any time. -In order to become a Trusted User, one must first find a sponsoring active TU, +In order to become a TU, one must first find a sponsoring TU, and arrange privately with them to announce their candidacy on the https://mailman.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aur-general[aur-general] mailing list. Following the announcement, standard voting procedure commences with a @@ -146,32 +110,46 @@ User for a period of three months. Removal of a TU --------------- -The removal of a Trusted User may also occur at any time. +The removal of a TU may also occur at any time. -A motion must be made by at least two active Trusted Users for the removal of a -Trusted User. The motion must be sent to +A motion must be made by at least two TUs for the removal of a +TU. The motion must be sent to https://mailman.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aur-general[aur-general], and contain a detailed and valid reason that the TU in question should be removed. Following the motion, standard voting procedure commences with a discussion -period of 7 days, a quorum of 75%, and a voting period of 7 days. +period of 7 days, a quorum of 75% of all TUs except for the TU being considered +for removal, and a voting period of 7 days. + ---- SVP( general_removal_of_TU, 7, 0.75, 7); ---- -The Trusted User brought up for removal may defend themselves during the -discussion period, but may not vote during the voting period, nor may they vote -on any other matters while SVP for their removal is in progress. +The TU brought up for removal may defend themselves during the +discussion period, but may not vote on the proposal. + + +Special Removal of an Inactive TU +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +A TU who has not done ANY of the following for a period of at least 2 months: + +1. added, removed or updated a package in +[community]+ or the AUR + +2. performed any action that required TU privileges on the AUR + +3. posted a message to https://mailman.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aur-general[aur-general] + +OR who has not voted in a consecutive series of voting periods, the starting dates +of which span 2 months or more, shall be brought up for special removal due to +inactivity. -There is one special case for removal, removal due to unwarranted and -undeclared inactivity, for which standard voting procedure deviates from the -above. This motion is also automatically triggered by repeated quorum offenses, -as described in the <<Q,Quorum>> subsection of this document. For this special -case, SVP is followed with a discussion period of three days, a quorum of 66%, -and a voting period of 5 days. +In this special case, the motion may be made by one TU instead of two, and SVP +is followed by a discussion period of three days, a quorum of 66%, and a voting +period of 5 days. ---- -SVP( inactivity_removal_of_TU, 3, 0.66, 5 ); +SVP( removal_of_inactive_TU, 3, 0.66, 5 ); ---- Amendment of Bylaws @@ -179,7 +157,7 @@ Amendment of Bylaws These bylaws may be amended at any time. -An active Trusted User must motion for an amendment by sending an announcement +A TU must motion for an amendment by sending an announcement to https://mailman.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aur-general[aur-general]. The message must either contain, or have attached, a patch against this document which accomplishes the suggested change. SVP is commenced at the time @@ -190,5 +168,5 @@ voting period of 7 days. SVP( amend_bylaws, 5, 0.75, 7); ---- -If the amendment fails, the same amendment may not be motioned for for a period +If the amendment fails, the same amendment may not be motioned for a period of three weeks. -- 1.8.3.4

5 11

[aur-general] deletion request
by Alexej Magura 22 Aug '13

22 Aug '13

Could yall please delete /nocp/, I'm the developer, and I thought that /nocp/was fully functional and ready to be packaged, but upon further testing today I realized that it's hardly functional at all, which is pretty dang disappointing. Anyway, here's a link to the AUR package page thingy. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nocp/ /**/ -- Alexej Magura Give a little more for a little less today. :)

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 22 Aug '13

22 Aug '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 8 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 20 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (8 total) == * devil-1.7.8-17 (i686) * mplayer-vaapi-36265-4 (i686) * netsurf-3.0-4 (i686) * synfig-0.64.0-7 (i686) * devil-1.7.8-17 (x86_64) * mplayer-vaapi-36265-4 (x86_64) * netsurf-3.0-4 (x86_64) * synfig-0.64.0-7 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (20 total) == * bbswitch-0.7-11 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * devil-1.7.8-17 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mplayer-vaapi-36265-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * netsurf-3.0-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-8 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-41 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * synfig-0.64.0-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-32 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-11 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.16-8 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.7-11 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * devil-1.7.8-17 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mplayer-vaapi-36265-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * netsurf-3.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-8 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-41 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * synfig-0.64.0-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-32 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-11 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.16-8 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. thomas - 1 signoffs

1 0