=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 7 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 15 packages missing signoffs
* 3 packages older than 14 days
(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)
== New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (7 total) ==
* salt-2014.7.0-1 (any)
* arm-none-eabi-binutils-2.24-2 (i686)
* avr-gcc-4.9.2-1 (i686)
* ragel-6.9-1 (i686)
* arm-none-eabi-binutils-2.24-2 (x86_64)
* avr-gcc-4.9.2-1 (x86_64)
* ragel-6.9-1 (x86_64)
== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (12 total) ==
* eric-5.5.0-1 (any)
1/2 signoffs
* freevo-1.9.0-14 (any)
0/2 signoffs
* salt-2014.7.0-1 (any)
0/2 signoffs
* shadowsocks-2.4-1 (any)
0/2 signoffs
* arm-none-eabi-binutils-2.24-2 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* avr-gcc-4.9.2-1 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* ragel-6.9-1 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* uwsgi-2.0.7-6 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* arm-none-eabi-binutils-2.24-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* avr-gcc-4.9.2-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* ragel-6.9-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* uwsgi-2.0.7-6 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
== Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (3 total) ==
* eric-i18n-5.5.0-1 (any)
1/2 signoffs
* packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
== All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (3 total) ==
* freevo-1.9.0-14 (any), since 2014-08-27
* packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (i686), since 2014-09-29
* packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (x86_64), since 2014-09-29
== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==
1. allan - 8 signoffs
2. bpiotrowski - 2 signoffs
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 8 packages missing signoffs
* 3 packages older than 14 days
(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)
== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (5 total) ==
* eric-5.5.0-1 (any)
1/2 signoffs
* freevo-1.9.0-14 (any)
0/2 signoffs
* shadowsocks-2.4-1 (any)
0/2 signoffs
* uwsgi-2.0.7-6 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* uwsgi-2.0.7-6 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
== Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (3 total) ==
* eric-i18n-5.5.0-1 (any)
1/2 signoffs
* packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
== All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (3 total) ==
* freevo-1.9.0-14 (any), since 2014-08-27
* packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (i686), since 2014-09-29
* packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (x86_64), since 2014-09-29
== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==
1. foutrelis - 2 signoffs
2. fyan - 1 signoffs
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 1 new package in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 8 packages missing signoffs
* 3 packages older than 14 days
(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)
== New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (1 total) ==
* shadowsocks-2.4-1 (any)
== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (5 total) ==
* eric-5.5.0-1 (any)
1/2 signoffs
* freevo-1.9.0-14 (any)
0/2 signoffs
* shadowsocks-2.4-1 (any)
0/2 signoffs
* uwsgi-2.0.7-6 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* uwsgi-2.0.7-6 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
== Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (3 total) ==
* eric-i18n-5.5.0-1 (any)
1/2 signoffs
* packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
== All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (3 total) ==
* freevo-1.9.0-14 (any), since 2014-08-27
* packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (i686), since 2014-09-29
* packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (x86_64), since 2014-09-29
== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==
1. heftig - 4 signoffs
2. foutrelis - 2 signoffs
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 0 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 9 packages missing signoffs
* 3 packages older than 14 days
(Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by
pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one
package per architecture, even if it is a split package.)
== Incomplete signoffs for [community] (4 total) ==
* eric-5.5.0-1 (any)
1/2 signoffs
* freevo-1.9.0-14 (any)
0/2 signoffs
* uwsgi-2.0.7-6 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* uwsgi-2.0.7-6 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
== Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (5 total) ==
* eric-i18n-5.5.0-1 (any)
1/2 signoffs
* gmtp-1.3.8-1 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (i686)
0/1 signoffs
* gmtp-1.3.8-1 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
* packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (x86_64)
0/2 signoffs
== All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (3 total) ==
* freevo-1.9.0-14 (any), since 2014-08-27
* packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (i686), since 2014-09-29
* packagekit-qt-0.9.2-2 (x86_64), since 2014-09-29
== Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==
1. fyan - 6 signoffs
2. foutrelis - 5 signoffs
3. anatolik - 3 signoffs
Hi
Checking an outdated and orphaned PKGBuild I stumbled across this:
http://pkgbuild.com/git/aur-mirror.git/tree/bouml-4.23
On the mirror is a PKGBuild named bouml-4.23 to built a specific bouml
version.
But this PKGBuild doesn't appear on the webinterface (or searches using
the RPC interface)
~ $ cower -s bouml
aur/bouml 6.6-1 (87)
A free UML 2 modeler with C++, Idl, Java, PHP and Python code generation
aur/bouml-5.1.2 5.1.2-1 (0)
A free UML 2 modeler with C++, Idl, Java, PHP and Python code generation
aur/douml 1.07b4-2 (2)
UML diagram editor, fork of Bouml 4.22
So I suppose it was removed some time ago, but remained in the mirror.
Should such cases be reported or is there a script checking for such
things from time to time?
Best regards
Lex