March 2014 - Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Deletion request: gzip-musl-static, linux-api-headers-musl-static, tar-musl-static, xz-musl-static
by ked 05 Mar '14

05 Mar '14

Please delete my own packages: gzip-musl-static, linux-api-headers-musl-static, tar-musl-static, xz-musl-static Thanks.

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 05 Mar '14

05 Mar '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 8 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (6 total) == * mod_wsgi-3.4-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mod_wsgi2-3.4-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * passenger-4.0.37-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mod_wsgi-3.4-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mod_wsgi2-3.4-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * passenger-4.0.37-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * mod_itk-2.4.7.r01-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mod_itk-2.4.7.r01-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. anatolik - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] [Orphanage Request] electrum-server-git
by Andy Weidenbaum 05 Mar '14

05 Mar '14

Requesting orphanage of electrum-server-git<https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/electrum-server-git>; the maintainer of this package has not been responsive to inquiries. I have an updated PKGBUILD prepared: https://github.com/atweiden/pkgbuilds/tree/master/electrum-server-git

2 1

[aur-general] Package works before the compression, not after
by Attila Bukor 05 Mar '14

05 Mar '14

Hey guys, I've submitted this package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gush/ to AUR, but I have a major problem with it - namely it doesn't work after it's installed. The package builds a PHAR (PHP archive, kinda like a binary) and installs it to /usr/share/webapps/bin/gush.phar which /usr/bin/gush is symlinked to. When I run gush.phar in the ${pkgdir}/usr/share/webapps/bin/gush.phar, it works fine, but if I run makepkg && pacman -U *.tar.xz && gush it throws this error: http://bpaste.net/show/184744/ - it seems the phar is corrupted after uncompressing the xz archive. I have no idea if it's because of my own incompetency, a bug in makepkg, a bug in bsdtar or a bug in pacman, but it seems that is should be one of the above. Could you help me narrow the issue down or fix it please? Regards, Attila Bukor

4 7

[aur-general] [Removal Request] weston-rbp
by Srki 04 Mar '14

04 Mar '14

Hello, package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/weston-rbp is now obsolete since Raspberry Pi patched version is already included in ArchLinuxARM repositories: http://archlinuxarm.org/packages?search=weston

2 1

[aur-general] Forgotten AUR-Login
by Roman Titov 04 Mar '14

04 Mar '14

Hello, guys. Shame on me, but I just completelly forgot my AUR-login. First of all, I hoped AUR will remind me my login when I use "forgot login" func, but it just gave me link to change it. Then I tried loging in with my new pass and all of my common (and even uncommon) logins, but all of them failed. So I'm writing here now. Help me somehow, please. (I'm ready to add some stuff to AUR. ;3) I used same e-mail when registered (titovroman(a)gmail.com). Big "thanks" to everyone.

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 04 Mar '14

04 Mar '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 10 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (8 total) == * mod_wsgi-3.4-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mod_wsgi2-3.4-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * passenger-4.0.37-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python2-systemd-210-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mod_wsgi-3.4-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mod_wsgi2-3.4-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * passenger-4.0.37-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python2-systemd-210-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * mod_itk-2.4.7.r01-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mod_itk-2.4.7.r01-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. fyan - 5 signoffs 2. bluewind - 2 signoffs 3. djgera - 2 signoffs

1 0

Re: [aur-general] Request for replacing canon-ufr to cndrvcups-lb-bin
by LoneVVolf 04 Mar '14

04 Mar '14

Hi, I am the maintainer of the cndrvcups-lb package. First, I apologise for breaking the thread but i had aur-general mailing options set to digest, so can't reply in thread (changed to single now). After I found out Allen Choong had uploaded the package canon-ufr and this provided the binary counterpart of my cndrvcups-lb (builds from source ) I contacted him and we discussed what name to use for both packages to make it easier for users to see they were alternatives. If you look into the source files, you'll see several things : the downloaded file is called Linux_UFRII_PrinterDriver_Vxyz_uk_EN.tar.gz (xyz = version number) Inside that file are canon supplied deb & rpm binaries. they use names like cndrvcups-common-foo and cndrvcups-ufr2-foo In the sources folder you'll find cndrvcups-common-foo and cndrvcups-lb-foo . When i started work on this package in 2012 there were already several (older) packages for these printers using cndrvcups in the name, so it seemed logical to stick to that. As my package builds from source, I decided to stay close to name canon used for the source files, not the binaries. This lead to cndrvcups-lb and cndrvcups-common-lb. (there was already another cndrvcups-common package in aur that was incompatible with my package). I suggested to Allen Choong we could choose between cndrvcups-lb / cndrvcups-lb-bin and cndrvcups-ufr2 /cndrvcups-ufr2-bin , he was ok with cndrvcups-lb . Lone_Wolf

1 0

[aur-general] AUR package-database
by oliver 03 Mar '14

03 Mar '14

Hello, is there a direct way to download / access the AUR-package database (as file maybe)? Or is it necessary to go through https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ ? Ciao, Oliver

4 3

[aur-general] Request for replacing canon-ufr to cndrvcups-lb-bin
by Allen Choong 03 Mar '14

03 Mar '14

Dear AUR administrator, I am the maintainer of canon-ufr and cndrvcups-lb-bin. As discussion with Lone_Wolf, maintainer of cndrvcups-lb, the canon-ufr should be renamed to cndrvcups-lb-bin. Can you help to remove the canon-ufr and possibly move the comments to cndrvcups-lb-bin? Thank you. Regards, Allen

6 11