May 2014 - Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 12 May '14

12 May '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 6 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 9 packages missing signoffs * 1 package older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (6 total) == * openimageio-1.4.5.git-1 (i686) * openshadinglanguage-1.5.7dev-1 (i686) * xbmc-13.0-3 (i686) * openimageio-1.4.5.git-1 (x86_64) * openshadinglanguage-1.5.7dev-1 (x86_64) * xbmc-13.0-3 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (9 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any) 1/2 signoffs * mailman-2.1.18.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * openimageio-1.4.5.git-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * openshadinglanguage-1.5.7dev-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * xbmc-13.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mailman-2.1.18.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * openimageio-1.4.5.git-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * openshadinglanguage-1.5.7dev-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * xbmc-13.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (1 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any), since 2014-03-21 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. eric - 4 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 11 May '14

11 May '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 5 packages missing signoffs * 3 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (5 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any) 1/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.9.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mailman-2.1.18.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.9.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mailman-2.1.18.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (3 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any), since 2014-03-21 * avr-gcc-4.9.0-1 (i686), since 2014-04-25 * avr-gcc-4.9.0-1 (x86_64), since 2014-04-25 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. andyrtr - 3 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Fwd: firefox-stable deleted
by Maxime Gauduin 11 May '14

11 May '14

Forwarding this to AUR General so that the world can see how nice a guy you are. Insults, racism, what else have you got in store? I've taken the liberty to suspend your AUR account, because, yeah, us higher ranks motherfuckers can do that. Now please reflect upon your behavior and realize what an hypocrit you are saying _we_ are the one who destroy the community, there is no destroying people who behave like _you_ do. Now, if you don't want to depend on us doing the work for you, for free, be my guest, make your own distro, alone, see how you fare. But stop creating duplicates out of sheer lunacy because you couldn't bear waiting a single day. That's right, _a_ day. FYI, Firefox 29 was released on 2014-04-29 [1] and according to our SVN our package was updated 10 days ago [2], so that makes a 1 day delay, not a week. Please get your facts straight before assaulting people. BTW, that bit about grammar was quite funny, there isn't a single error in mine, however I'd really not vouch for yours. [1] https://wiki.mozilla.org/RapidRelease/Calendar [2] https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/log/trunk?h=packages/f… Have a nice day, ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Aaron Caffrey <aaron_caffrey(a)hotmail.com> Date: Sat, May 10, 2014 at 11:22 AM Subject: firefox-stable deleted To: "alucryd(a)gmail.com" <alucryd(a)gmail.com> Wow just wow. What a ignorance. As I said, me and my friends do NOT want to rely on someone else to update the packages with a delay of whole week. I do have plenty of free time and your grammar isn't much different than the average African American. Fuck yourself and wish you all the worse, that's why motherfuckers with higher rank like are killing the archlinux community and partly the forum users. Burn in Hell, Aaron -- Maxime

3 2

[aur-general] Removal request for cantata-qt
by Spyros Stathopoulos 11 May '14

11 May '14

Hi! The cantata package in [community] is now build with no kde dependencies so the package I maintain is now superfluous. Please delete it from the AUR. Thanks! Spyros

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request: firefox-stable
by Doug Newgard 10 May '14

10 May '14

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/firefox-stable/ This is simply a duplicate of firefox in [extra].

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request: arc-status
by Thiago Barroso Perrotta 10 May '14

10 May '14

Hi, Just stumbled upon this[1] package, it is very old (last updated in 2009) and useful only when Arch used to have RC init scripts. I'd suggest its removal. Also, I think there are still a number of packages related to old initscripts. Do you mind if every time we find one, we request its removal here, or would this be too cumbersome? [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/arc-status/

3 4

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 10 May '14

10 May '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 7 packages missing signoffs * 3 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (7 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any) 1/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.9.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bind-9.10.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mailman-2.1.18.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.9.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bind-9.10.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mailman-2.1.18.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (3 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any), since 2014-03-21 * avr-gcc-4.9.0-1 (i686), since 2014-04-25 * avr-gcc-4.9.0-1 (x86_64), since 2014-04-25 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] Searching a TU to maintain gqrx in [community]
by Dominik Heidler 10 May '14

10 May '14

Hi, I'm currently maintaining gqrx [1] in [aur]. The pkg has 20 votes and I would like to see it in community. It would be really nice if someone would like to maintain it. Now the downside: You would also also need to maintain some dependencies: The GNU Radio source block: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gr-osmosdr/ The device drivers: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bladerf/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gr-fcdproplus/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hackrf/ Some I/Q balancing extansion for gnuradio: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gr-iqbal/ [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gqrx/ - http://gqrx.dk/ regards, Dominik

2 2

[aur-general] Disownment request: gtk2-aqd and gtk3-aqd
by Giuseppe Borzi 09 May '14

09 May '14

Hello, I would like to request disownment of the packages "gtk2-aqd" [1] and "gtk3-aqd" [2] with intetion of taking over maintenance along with the already orphaned "xfce4-macmenu-plugin" [3]. Current maintainer did not respond to flagging the package out of date since 2013-07-04 for gtk2-aqd and since 2013-06-17 for gtk3-aqd and is not reachable by email (Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender). [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk2-aqd/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk3-aqd/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xfce4-macmenu-plugin/ Thanks.

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 09 May '14

09 May '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 15 packages missing signoffs * 1 package older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * arm-none-eabi-gdb-7.7.1-1 (i686) * arm-none-eabi-gdb-7.7.1-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (15 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any) 1/2 signoffs * arm-none-eabi-gdb-7.7.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.9.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bind-9.10.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gambas3-3.5.3-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gdal-1.11.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mailman-2.1.18.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * pdf2djvu-0.7.17-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * arm-none-eabi-gdb-7.7.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.9.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bind-9.10.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gambas3-3.5.3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gdal-1.11.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mailman-2.1.18.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pdf2djvu-0.7.17-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (1 total) == * waf-1.7.15-2 (any), since 2014-03-21 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bpiotrowski - 2 signoffs 2. foutrelis - 2 signoffs 3. anatolik - 1 signoffs

1 0