August 2014 - Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Disowning gitlab-shell
by rev＠revthefox.co.uk 29 Aug '14

29 Aug '14

I've disowned https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gitlab-shell/ if anyone wants it. -- TheReverend403 - http://revthefox.co.uk - rev(a)revthefox.co.uk - PGP: 0xA41CDAA9

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 29 Aug '14

29 Aug '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 16 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 25 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (16 total) == * lz4-122-1 (i686) * php-geoip-1.0.8-4 (i686) * php-memcache-3.0.8-3 (i686) * php-memcached-2.2.0-2 (i686) * php-mongo-1.5.4-2 (i686) * seamonkey-2.26.1-2 (i686) * xdebug-2.2.5-2 (i686) * xulrunner-31.0-2 (i686) * lz4-122-1 (x86_64) * php-geoip-1.0.8-4 (x86_64) * php-memcache-3.0.8-3 (x86_64) * php-memcached-2.2.0-2 (x86_64) * php-mongo-1.5.4-2 (x86_64) * seamonkey-2.26.1-2 (x86_64) * xdebug-2.2.5-2 (x86_64) * xulrunner-31.0-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (25 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-14 (any) 0/2 signoffs * lxpanel-0.7.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * lz4-122-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * php-geoip-1.0.8-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * php-memcache-3.0.8-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * php-memcached-2.2.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * php-mongo-1.5.4-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * pppd-ldap-0.12b-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * seamonkey-2.26.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-4.3.14-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * xdebug-2.2.5-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * xtrabackup-2.2.3-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * xulrunner-31.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * lxpanel-0.7.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * lz4-122-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * php-geoip-1.0.8-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * php-memcache-3.0.8-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * php-memcached-2.2.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * php-mongo-1.5.4-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pppd-ldap-0.12b-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * seamonkey-2.26.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-4.3.14-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * xdebug-2.2.5-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * xtrabackup-2.2.3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * xulrunner-31.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 28 Aug '14

28 Aug '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 3 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 11 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (3 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-14 (any) * xtrabackup-2.2.3-1 (i686) * xtrabackup-2.2.3-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (11 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-14 (any) 0/2 signoffs * lxpanel-0.7.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * pppd-ldap-0.12b-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-matplotlib-1.4.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-4.3.14-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * xtrabackup-2.2.3-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * lxpanel-0.7.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pppd-ldap-0.12b-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-matplotlib-1.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-4.3.14-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * xtrabackup-2.2.3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. foutrelis - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 27 Aug '14

27 Aug '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 4 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 8 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (4 total) == * lxpanel-0.7.0-1 (i686) * virtualbox-4.3.14-4 (i686) * lxpanel-0.7.0-1 (x86_64) * virtualbox-4.3.14-4 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (8 total) == * lxpanel-0.7.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * pppd-ldap-0.12b-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-matplotlib-1.4.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-4.3.14-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * lxpanel-0.7.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pppd-ldap-0.12b-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-matplotlib-1.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-4.3.14-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. thomas - 2 signoffs 2. fyan - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 26 Aug '14

26 Aug '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 6 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 14 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (6 total) == * android-tools-4.4.4_r2.0.1-1 (i686) * ndisc6-1.0.2-8 (i686) * python-matplotlib-1.4.0-1 (i686) * android-tools-4.4.4_r2.0.1-1 (x86_64) * ndisc6-1.0.2-8 (x86_64) * python-matplotlib-1.4.0-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (14 total) == * android-tools-4.4.4_r2.0.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * dnscrypt-proxy-1.4.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libsodium-0.7.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * ndisc6-1.0.2-8 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * pppd-ldap-0.12b-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-matplotlib-1.4.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * zeromq-4.0.4-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * android-tools-4.4.4_r2.0.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dnscrypt-proxy-1.4.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libsodium-0.7.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ndisc6-1.0.2-8 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pppd-ldap-0.12b-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-matplotlib-1.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * zeromq-4.0.4-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] sunpinyin/sunpinyin-data packages pulled back from [community-testing]
by Felix Yan 25 Aug '14

25 Aug '14

The sunpinyin/sunpinyin-data 2.0.3.20140820-1 (new release from open-gram project) packages are having issues on candidate list ordering, I've removed them from [community-testing]. Please downgrade the two packages if you had them installed from [community- testing]. Regards, Felix Yan

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 25 Aug '14

25 Aug '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 6 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 13 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (6 total) == * dnscrypt-proxy-1.4.0-2 (i686) * libsodium-0.7.0-1 (i686) * zeromq-4.0.4-4 (i686) * dnscrypt-proxy-1.4.0-2 (x86_64) * libsodium-0.7.0-1 (x86_64) * zeromq-4.0.4-4 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (13 total) == * sunpinyin-data-1:2.0.3.20140820-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * dnscrypt-proxy-1.4.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libsodium-0.7.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * minetest-0.4.10-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * pppd-ldap-0.12b-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * sunpinyin-2.0.3.20140820-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * zeromq-4.0.4-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * dnscrypt-proxy-1.4.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libsodium-0.7.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * minetest-0.4.10-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pppd-ldap-0.12b-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sunpinyin-2.0.3.20140820-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * zeromq-4.0.4-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 24 Aug '14

24 Aug '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 4 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 7 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (4 total) == * minetest-0.4.10-4 (i686) * pppd-ldap-0.12b-5 (i686) * minetest-0.4.10-4 (x86_64) * pppd-ldap-0.12b-5 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (7 total) == * sunpinyin-data-1:2.0.3.20140820-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * minetest-0.4.10-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * pppd-ldap-0.12b-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * sunpinyin-2.0.3.20140820-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * minetest-0.4.10-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pppd-ldap-0.12b-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sunpinyin-2.0.3.20140820-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. thomas - 3 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 23 Aug '14

23 Aug '14

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 10 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * minetest-0.4.10-3 (i686) * minetest-0.4.10-3 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (10 total) == * avr-libc-1.8.1-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * sunpinyin-data-1:2.0.3.20140820-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.9.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * avr-gdb-7.8-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * minetest-0.4.10-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * sunpinyin-2.0.3.20140820-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.9.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gdb-7.8-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * minetest-0.4.10-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sunpinyin-2.0.3.20140820-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bisson - 4 signoffs 2. andyrtr - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] re-submission of onionshare
by simon.hanna＠serve-me.info 22 Aug '14

22 Aug '14

Hi, today I wanted to install onionshare. It's website only listed ways to install using deb and rpm files. So I searched the AUR. I didn't find anything but I came across a deletion request. In this request the maintainer wanted to remove all reference of him from the package. The result was that the whole PKGBUILD was removed from AUR. I found the PKGBUILD in the AUR's git repo, added myself as a maintainer and would publish it again. Is that OK? Since it would be my first submitted PKGBUILD it would be nice, if you could tell me if I could do anything better. Here are two versions one using the latest git commit [1] and the other using the latest release [2]. Should I submit both, or just one of them. If only one, then which one is "better"? cheers,Simon [1] http://sprunge.us/NgaR[2] http://sprunge.us/IagK

2 1