October 2015 - Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 16 Oct '15

16 Oct '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 4 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 14 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (4 total) == * calibre-2.40.0-2 (i686) * fcitx-qt5-1.0.4-2 (i686) * calibre-2.40.0-2 (x86_64) * fcitx-qt5-1.0.4-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (14 total) == * calibre-2.40.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * evemu-2.3.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * fcitx-qt5-1.0.4-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-5.0.6-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-5.0.6-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vtk-6.3.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * wireshark-1.12.8-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * calibre-2.40.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * evemu-2.3.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fcitx-qt5-1.0.4-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-5.0.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-5.0.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vtk-6.3.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * wireshark-1.12.8-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] pandoc in community vs. pandoc-bin
by Javier Vasquez 16 Oct '15

16 Oct '15

Hi, Sorry for the question, but I'd like to understand if pandoc-bin in AUR offers something the new pandoc in community doesn't. Before, there was no pandoc package under the repos, and there was no really full solution but the pandoc-bin. However I'm wondering if that's already covered by pandoc in community now. Thanks, -- Javier

3 4

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 15 Oct '15

15 Oct '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 36 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 42 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (36 total) == * evemu-2.3.1-1 (i686) * haskell-aeson-0.10.0.0-2 (i686) * haskell-aeson-pretty-0.7.2-2 (i686) * haskell-attoparsec-0.13.0.1-4 (i686) * haskell-conduit-extra-1.1.9.1-2 (i686) * haskell-cookie-0.4.1.6-1 (i686) * haskell-haddock-api-2.16.1-2 (i686) * haskell-haddock-library-1.2.1-1 (i686) * haskell-http-client-0.4.24-2 (i686) * haskell-http-client-tls-0.2.2-2 (i686) * haskell-pandoc-citeproc-0.8-2 (i686) * haskell-pandoc-types-1.12.4.7-3 (i686) * haskell-scientific-0.3.4.2-1 (i686) * haskell-texmath-0.8.3-3 (i686) * haskell-xml-conduit-1.3.2-1 (i686) * haskell-yaml-0.8.15.1-3 (i686) * pandoc-1.15.0.6-2 (i686) * wireshark-1.12.8-1 (i686) * evemu-2.3.1-1 (x86_64) * haskell-aeson-0.10.0.0-2 (x86_64) * haskell-aeson-pretty-0.7.2-2 (x86_64) * haskell-attoparsec-0.13.0.1-4 (x86_64) * haskell-conduit-extra-1.1.9.1-2 (x86_64) * haskell-cookie-0.4.1.6-1 (x86_64) * haskell-haddock-api-2.16.1-2 (x86_64) * haskell-haddock-library-1.2.1-1 (x86_64) * haskell-http-client-0.4.24-2 (x86_64) * haskell-http-client-tls-0.2.2-2 (x86_64) * haskell-pandoc-citeproc-0.8-2 (x86_64) * haskell-pandoc-types-1.12.4.7-3 (x86_64) * haskell-scientific-0.3.4.2-1 (x86_64) * haskell-texmath-0.8.3-3 (x86_64) * haskell-xml-conduit-1.3.2-1 (x86_64) * haskell-yaml-0.8.15.1-3 (x86_64) * pandoc-1.15.0.6-2 (x86_64) * wireshark-1.12.8-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (42 total) == * evemu-2.3.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * haskell-aeson-0.10.0.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * haskell-aeson-pretty-0.7.2-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * haskell-attoparsec-0.13.0.1-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * haskell-conduit-extra-1.1.9.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * haskell-cookie-0.4.1.6-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * haskell-haddock-api-2.16.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * haskell-haddock-library-1.2.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * haskell-http-client-0.4.24-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * haskell-http-client-tls-0.2.2-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * haskell-pandoc-citeproc-0.8-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * haskell-pandoc-types-1.12.4.7-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * haskell-scientific-0.3.4.2-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * haskell-texmath-0.8.3-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * haskell-xml-conduit-1.3.2-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * haskell-yaml-0.8.15.1-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * pandoc-1.15.0.6-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-5.0.6-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-5.0.6-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vtk-6.3.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * wireshark-1.12.8-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * evemu-2.3.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-aeson-0.10.0.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-aeson-pretty-0.7.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-attoparsec-0.13.0.1-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-conduit-extra-1.1.9.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-cookie-0.4.1.6-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-haddock-api-2.16.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-haddock-library-1.2.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-http-client-0.4.24-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-http-client-tls-0.2.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-pandoc-citeproc-0.8-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-pandoc-types-1.12.4.7-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-scientific-0.3.4.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-texmath-0.8.3-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-xml-conduit-1.3.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-yaml-0.8.15.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pandoc-1.15.0.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-5.0.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-5.0.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vtk-6.3.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * wireshark-1.12.8-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] Feedback for rmlint-git and call for a TU
by christopher＠ira-kunststoffe.de 15 Oct '15

15 Oct '15

Hello, Im the developer of rmlint (http://rmlint.rtfd.org) and mantain also the rmlint-git AUR package (https://aur4.archlinux.org/packages/rmlint-git/) I'd love to see it also in the official community repository, especially since some users don't like to install the build dependencies (scons, sphinx). For that, of course, a TU would be needed and I figured the best place to find one would be here. I think the number of votes should be enough. If changes in the PKGBUILD are required, I will fix that beforehand of course. There is also another package by someone else that is not build from git, but from release tarballs: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rmlint/ Thanks, Chris P.S: Sorry if that got posted twice.

6 16

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 14 Oct '15

14 Oct '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 6 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (6 total) == * virtualbox-modules-5.0.6-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-5.0.6-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vtk-6.3.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-5.0.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-5.0.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vtk-6.3.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] TU application: Pierre Neidhardt
by Pierre Neidhardt 13 Oct '15

13 Oct '15

Hi! My name is Pierre Neidhardt. I am sending my TU application under the sponsor of Alexander F Rødseth (xyproto). (Thanks again, Alexander.) Before going on with the geekiness, a few things about me: my hobbies include cinema, reading & watching stuff on psychology and education, as well as quitting my job + moving out + travelling to another country every two years. I am a computer scientist. I am deeply interested in algorithms, languages and operating systems, but my main field remains computer graphics. I have worked in research and briefly for the video game industry. I am working / planning on getting games and engines running on Unices. I am also a little active in the Wine project and on AppDB. I have been dealing with many different flavours of Unices for several years now. My preference goes to KISS / fundamental Unices, such as Gentoo, FreeBSD, or, surprisingly, Arch :D I love the robustness and the scientific approach of these distributions and their philosophy. (I have deep respect for the dreadful <http://cat-v.org>. :p) I am fond of programming languages created with a technically simple and elegant design in mind. I am thinking of C, Lua and the younger Go. I've contributed to numerous open-source projects (dwb, Emacs, Mutt, ranger...), since I strongly endorse the opinion that upstream should be fixed first ;) I have created and maintained a few programs. One of them is demlo[1], a (very) dynamic and extensible music organizer. (Currently broken with Lua 5.3 because of an unported dependency... Will fix soon!) I also used to be a TeX and LaTeX guru and I contributed to a major part of the LaTeX Wikibook[2]. (Beside new content, I helped for a massive re-organization, structure and progression clarification, duplicates removal and pointer use.) Regarding Arch, I have maintained a few dozen AUR packages[3] in the last few years. (Some of which I have disowned out of a lack of interest.) Other contributions include numerous Wiki edits[4] (Cups, Emacs, Mutt, wifi), a few bug reports (everybody knows Arch has no bugs :p), some forum strolling and some documentation / patches around makepkg & co[5][6]. I have recently been working with Alexander on overhauling the Go package[7]: correct dependencies, strip binaries, update cleanup, set up cross-compilation tool-chain properly and remove unneeded binaries. This gave me even more motivation than before to become a TU. I have subsequently asked Alexander to endorse my TU application. My focus is on Go packages, other CLI applications, Lua libraries and video games. I might consider packaging Go programs such as gur, camlistore, gotsync, oh, fnd, tabby, to name a few. The `go` compiler enforces static building (rationale: [8]), which often results in packages with no dependencies at all. (The `go` package itself has none!) This makes packaging even more relevant, as the requirements for building the package are much higher than for installing the result. AUR packages that I would like to maintain in community include clyrics, docx2txt, tespeed, textadept, uncrustify, translate, trash-cli. Thank you and happy voting! Cheers! -- Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.bitbucket.org [1]: https://ambrevar.bitbucket.org/demlo/ [2]: http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/User:Ambrevar [3]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?SeB=m&K=Ambrevar [4]: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/User:Ambrevar [5]: https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2014-February/018807.html [6]: https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2014-March/018851.html [7]: https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/community.git/commit/trunk?h=packag… [8]: http://port70.net/~nsz/32_dynlink.html

9 13

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 13 Oct '15

13 Oct '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 4 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 10 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (4 total) == * rethinkdb-2.1.5-1 (i686) * thrift-0.9.3-1 (i686) * rethinkdb-2.1.5-1 (x86_64) * thrift-0.9.3-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (10 total) == * rethinkdb-2.1.5-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * thrift-0.9.3-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-5.0.6-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-5.0.6-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vtk-6.3.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rethinkdb-2.1.5-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * thrift-0.9.3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-5.0.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-5.0.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vtk-6.3.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. fyan - 5 signoffs 2. eworm - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 12 Oct '15

12 Oct '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 16 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 22 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (16 total) == * eclib-20150827-1 (i686) * flint-2.5.2-2 (i686) * linbox-1.3.2-6 (i686) * ntl-9.4.0-1 (i686) * pynac-0.3.9.5-1 (i686) * sagemath-6.9-1 (i686) * singular-3.1.7.p1-9 (i686) * eclib-20150827-1 (x86_64) * flint-2.5.2-2 (x86_64) * linbox-1.3.2-6 (x86_64) * ntl-9.4.0-1 (x86_64) * pynac-0.3.9.5-1 (x86_64) * sagemath-6.9-1 (x86_64) * singular-3.1.7.p1-9 (x86_64) * brial-0.8.4.3-1 (i686) * brial-0.8.4.3-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (20 total) == * eclib-20150827-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * flint-2.5.2-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * linbox-1.3.2-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * ntl-9.4.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * pynac-0.3.9.5-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * sagemath-6.9-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * singular-3.1.7.p1-9 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-5.0.6-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-5.0.6-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vtk-6.3.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * eclib-20150827-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * flint-2.5.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * linbox-1.3.2-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ntl-9.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pynac-0.3.9.5-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sagemath-6.9-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * singular-3.1.7.p1-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-5.0.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-5.0.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vtk-6.3.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * brial-0.8.4.3-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * brial-0.8.4.3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 11 Oct '15

11 Oct '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 6 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (6 total) == * virtualbox-modules-5.0.6-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-5.0.6-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vtk-6.3.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-5.0.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-5.0.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vtk-6.3.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bisson - 8 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 10 Oct '15

10 Oct '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 6 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (6 total) == * virtualbox-modules-5.0.6-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-5.0.6-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vtk-6.3.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-5.0.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-5.0.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vtk-6.3.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. fyan - 3 signoffs

1 0