August 2015 - Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 11 Aug '15

11 Aug '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 2 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) == * dnscrypt-proxy-1.6.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * dnscrypt-proxy-1.6.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. ronald - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 10 Aug '15

10 Aug '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 2 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) == * dnscrypt-proxy-1.6.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * dnscrypt-proxy-1.6.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. andyrtr - 4 signoffs 2. anatolik - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Why can't I search the packages not migrated to AUR4?
by Iru Cai 09 Aug '15

09 Aug '15

Hi, I found some packages original in AUR3 can't be search in AUR4, but actually the package web page is in AUR4. Iru Cai

4 3

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 09 Aug '15

09 Aug '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 2 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) == * dnscrypt-proxy-1.6.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * dnscrypt-proxy-1.6.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 8 signoffs 2. bisson - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Can't upload packages to aur now
by Pablo Lezaeta Reyes 09 Aug '15

09 Aug '15

I have 51 packages with the user Jristz but I decide change the .git/config and change sed "s|aur4.|aur.|g" but now I can't upload packages and fixes. I attempt changing my ssh-key and I test everyone (ecdsa,ed25519,rsa1,dsa,rsa) but without succes, then I attempt to reclone a package for test but aur refuse to allow me to do it. so far my .ssh/config is Host aur.archlinux.org aur4.archlinux.org Hostname aur.archlinux.org IdentityFile ~/.ssh/id_rsa.pub User aur Port 22 and I have aur.archlinux.org in the know hosts list, so What could happened that I cant even clone my packages?? -- *Pablo Lezaeta*

5 8

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 08 Aug '15

08 Aug '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 2 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) == * dnscrypt-proxy-1.6.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * dnscrypt-proxy-1.6.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. djgera - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 07 Aug '15

07 Aug '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 3 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * dnscrypt-proxy-1.6.0-2 (i686) * dnscrypt-proxy-1.6.0-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (3 total) == * python-flickrapi-2.1.1-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * dnscrypt-proxy-1.6.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * dnscrypt-proxy-1.6.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. fyan - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] broadcom-wl-dkms
by Frank Vanderham 06 Aug '15

06 Aug '15

Folks, after a couple of years of maintaining broadcom-wl-dkms and enduring the Broadcom driver pains, I have finally switched to an Intel card. I don't mind staying as maintainer of this package, but since I can no longer test the driver myself, if there is a volunteer to take over, I'm okay with that as well. Please respond if you have an interest.

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 06 Aug '15

06 Aug '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 11 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (11 total) == * fail2ban-0.9.3-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-flickrapi-2.1.1-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-networkx-1.10-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * mongodb-3.0.5-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * opencc-1.0.3-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * roxterm-3.0.2-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * sakura-3.3.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mongodb-3.0.5-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * opencc-1.0.3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * roxterm-3.0.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sakura-3.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. eworm - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Strange behavior : yaourt fail but makepkg success
by Félix Piédallu 05 Aug '15

05 Aug '15

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hi there ! The flite package has a strange behavior : Installing it with Yaourt fails : $ yaourt -S flite ar: ../../..//tmp/yaourt-tmp-felix/aur-flite/lib/libflite.shared.a: Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type ../../config/common_make_rules:116 : la recette pour la cible « /tmp/yaourt-tmp-felix/aur-flite/obj/src/audio/.build_so » a échouée But makepkg succeeds to build the package : $ rm -rf lib/ obj/ pkg/ src/ flite-2.0.0-release.tar.bz2 $ makepkg ==> Création finie : flite 2.0.0-2 (mer. août 5 22:52:30 CEST 2015) What could be happening with Yaourt ? NB : I am not the flite maintainer, though I would like it to work out of the box ;) - -- Félix Piédallu Président du Club Robotronik Phelma 06 51 41 32 48 Manjaro Linux. Feel the freedom. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVwn4VAAoJEMJ1NtNxTzOf8xEQAKlmFDLymYq2p43fVS9wNHHP rgdCcbiJvalQWnJ1UsIzjpxKWtld8AMYzSaOg5iVeplVogwFrwOyvfhMSXjIFJVW +M3VwSR6tUPd5DkQ2IsRbqsiI7h2ul9HebRux4nziUbVf2WWZ+BgKV1ZhiXWUKm0 sZV+OzNtplNx585ma7j0SZ+aKr38kMDS6OZLcD1hI2P8SLmN1KYe+d0wq+WtCN6p ajSo7Si9Z/6x0TWQdpS9V3p1y23VatL1+yn9q4LcrLFRgNmo2KK2uOQhOHTQJyKv KKbPukym5Iqeo8wcXYrJfp3qivinGLs3PCsDeYjZ8BXah5aQptbO4XVAuYCi/HbG y/OTMjxtDDdbMqtE51zaugIyXUuLlKWeWxGtpuzdkEAwz5cD2uBPVkbh5on0s/om 0MQ0pYlrmm/rZgUlSC4CMhB0WSUiQH41zh3zCaBGHTmi8/+7KlNTIxbxHOOO+VZn fYL1xVhZr0/2NGcJ7akh3Uh+Z80V0Mcs0O8xNKeGSUMGFfDX4aRXnE5wZShqM/MY M6NjeZEHlSwBa4BXloSubHBn12vjcT94vASzJavaLQWJyn5v4TOgMyUzKBQmO2Vf fSQNxZWwvW40KxwtQG0rrKly+L+AUjKPKJbUx/mYYBWFT5iG5BTBAIdVgK18awam 3co4vDailDYMHhdIp+9F =1bwx -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

4 4