Aur-general November 2016

aur-general@lists.archlinux.org

41 participants
47 discussions

[aur-general] Fwd: [REPORT] Banned for reporting Out of Date CVS packages by Alucryd
by Ake Doragon no Namida 04 Nov '16

04 Nov '16

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Ake Doragon no Namida <quomoow(a)gmail.com> Date: 2016-11-03 13:48 GMT+01:00 Subject: [REPORT] Banned for reporting Out of Date CVS packages by Alucryd To: aur-general(a)archlinux.org Hi, i have a problem with Alucryd from AUR. Just read and give me your opinion. Me to Alucryd: > Hi, can you look at your packages? For example this package is out of date for more than 6 months. > > You have a lot of packages and a lot is up to date, so it is just a little request. > > If you can, please update "not popular" sometimes, when you have free time or you can do it > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pantheon-files-plugin-dropbox-bzr/ > > // updated after mail https://code.launchpad.net/~elementary- … in-dropbox <https://code.launchpad.net/%7Eelementary-apps/pantheon-files/pantheon-files…> , ok, without any answer on mail. (nothing wrong anyway) > Hi, > > Will you please stop flagging CVS packages that need absolutely no updating ? More than half of what you flagged builds perfectly fine and is not out of date. While the others do need some changes (which I already did or will this week) you will find that I have close to no patience and might get temporarily banned really soon if you keep trying it. > > Cheers, > -- > Maxime > > // Ok, so this guys mean: if i have installed new version (for example 10) a year ago, and i want update my package to new version (f.e.55) i must remember this package name and reinstall it manually, cos *pacman -Syu* or *yaourt -Syyu* will not work. And what when i will have 200 packages on my PC with this like "out of date" version in aur? Maybe pkgbuild is always UP to date, but version what is in AUR *IS NOT* *BANNED? For what?* https://www.archlinux.org/packages/flaghelp/ -- nothing about CVS packages https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Ta … a_CVS_repo <https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Talk:VCS_package_guidelines#Updating_a…> -- first line what is written > CVS is not supported in pacman 4.1 like the other VCS tools. You will need to update pkgver manually until CVS support is added. > > i don't know what is going on, and why some of Thrusted Users are a little d*cky (maybe just this guy), but that's not a nice look for *Arch Linux Distribution*. Even for Thrusted Users Arch is rolling distribution what does mean, always up to date. So to keep that initiative i am looking for Out Of Date packages and flagging them with link to last update or last version. Sometimes packages are running from git to sourceforge of from git repo to other git repo (i found 1 package with this mind*uck, official move wat was written on official website of package). But anyway it is not thing for wich i should be banned. **uck* or *d*ck* mean *duck* Looking for unban, justice and TU should respect the laws

7 10

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 04 Nov '16

04 Nov '16

1 0

[aur-general] forgot email
by Markus Bockhacker 03 Nov '16

03 Nov '16

Hi guys, seems like i forgot my email/pw combo. I know I registered one in the time around the aur4 switch... My Username on the forums is "s1lvester" (same email as this one). Can someone help me out and change the email to this one so I can reset the passwd? Thanx! Markus

2 1

[aur-general] check_logfiles PKGBUILD - newbe question
by Jakub Skory 03 Nov '16

03 Nov '16

Hi, I wrote my first in life PKGBUILD for my own purposes (I have some Arch's in my enviroment, and I wanted to make some automatic deployement using Ansible, but it is not relevant). It would be nice to receivce some feedback from you about that. I packaged one nagios plugin check_logfiles because I needed it. There is monitoring-plugins package on official repos, but it contains only poor check_logs plugin which does not have some cool features like check_logfiles. It is worth to place it in AUR or I should just keep it for myself? # Maintainer: Jakub Skory <q84fh(a)q84fh.net> pkgname=check_logfiles pkgver=3.7.5.2 pkgrel=1 pkgdesc="check_logfiles is used to scan the lines of a file for regular expressions." arch=('i686' 'x86_64') url="http://labs.consol.de/nagios/check_logfiles/" license=('GPL') depends=('perl') source=("https://labs.consol.de/assets/downloads/nagios/check_logfiles-3.7.5.2.tar.gz") build() { cd "$srcdir/$pkgname-$pkgver" ./configure --libexecdir=/usr/lib/monitoring-plugins/ make } package() { cd "$srcdir/$pkgname-$pkgver" make DESTDIR="$pkgdir/" install } md5sums=('6b732721cd7dd1138e9c087c1cb0bd4e')

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 03 Nov '16

03 Nov '16

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 4 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 15 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (4 total) == * libcurl-compat-7.51.0-1 (i686) * libcurl-gnutls-7.51.0-1 (i686) * libcurl-compat-7.51.0-1 (x86_64) * libcurl-gnutls-7.51.0-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (15 total) == * mitmproxy-0.18.2-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * collectd-5.6.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gammu-1.37.91-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * kmymoney-4.8.0-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libcurl-compat-7.51.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libcurl-gnutls-7.51.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * ntop-5.0.1-9 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-gammu-2.7-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * collectd-5.6.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gammu-1.37.91-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * kmymoney-4.8.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libcurl-compat-7.51.0-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * libcurl-gnutls-7.51.0-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * ntop-5.0.1-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-gammu-2.7-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. polyzen - 5 signoffs 2. grazzolini - 4 signoffs 3. pid1 - 2 signoffs 4. anthraxx - 2 signoffs 5. hcartiaux - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 02 Nov '16

02 Nov '16

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 5 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 13 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (5 total) == * mitmproxy-0.18.2-1 (any) * collectd-5.6.1-1 (i686) * ntop-5.0.1-9 (i686) * collectd-5.6.1-1 (x86_64) * ntop-5.0.1-9 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (13 total) == * mitmproxy-0.18.2-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.27-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * collectd-5.6.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gammu-1.37.91-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * kmymoney-4.8.0-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * ntop-5.0.1-9 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-gammu-2.7-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.27-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * collectd-5.6.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gammu-1.37.91-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * kmymoney-4.8.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ntop-5.0.1-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-gammu-2.7-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. lcarlier - 4 signoffs 2. hcartiaux - 3 signoffs 3. polyzen - 2 signoffs 4. basica - 1 signoffs 5. pierre - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 01 Nov '16

01 Nov '16

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 2 fully signed off packages * 19 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (19 total) == * systemd-swap-3.1.2-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.27-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bmon-3.9-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * confuse-3.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gammu-1.37.91-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * i3status-2.10-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * kmymoney-4.8.0-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libftdi-1.3-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * nodejs-7.0.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-gammu-2.7-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tilda-1.3.3-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.27-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bmon-3.9-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * confuse-3.0-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * gammu-1.37.91-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * kmymoney-4.8.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libftdi-1.3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-gammu-2.7-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tilda-1.3.3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Completed signoffs (2 total) == * i3status-2.10-2 (x86_64) * nodejs-7.0.0-1 (x86_64) == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. xaver - 2 signoffs 2. GeneC - 1 signoffs 3. roentgen - 1 signoffs 4. hcartiaux - 1 signoffs 5. grawity - 1 signoffs

1 0

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

Aur-general November 2016