September 2016 - Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 24 Sep '16

24 Sep '16

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 2 fully signed off packages * 15 packages missing signoffs * 8 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * opencascade-6.9.1-7 (i686) * opencascade-6.9.1-7 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (15 total) == * puppet-4.7.0-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * bluegriffon-2.1.1-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * iscan-2.30.2-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * julius-4.4.2-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * luasec-2:0.6-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * opencascade-6.9.1-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * powerdns-recursor-4.0.2-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * prosody-0.10.r7656+.296543556065+-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bluegriffon-2.1.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * evemu-2.5.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * iscan-2.30.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * julius-4.4.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * opencascade-6.9.1-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * powerdns-recursor-4.0.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * prosody-0.10.r7656+.296543556065+-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Completed signoffs (2 total) == * evemu-2.5.0-1 (i686) * luasec-2:0.6-1 (x86_64) == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (8 total) == * iscan-2.30.2-1 (x86_64), since 2016-07-10 * iscan-2.30.2-1 (i686), since 2016-07-10 * luasec-2:0.6-1 (i686), since 2016-07-14 * luasec-2:0.6-1 (x86_64), since 2016-07-14 * powerdns-recursor-4.0.2-1 (i686), since 2016-08-30 * powerdns-recursor-4.0.2-1 (x86_64), since 2016-08-30 * prosody-0.10.r7656+.296543556065+-1 (i686), since 2016-09-05 * prosody-0.10.r7656+.296543556065+-1 (x86_64), since 2016-09-05 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. hcartiaux - 1 signoffs 2. Irishluck83 - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] NicoHood goes on holidays
by NicoHood 23 Sep '16

23 Sep '16

Hey guys, thanks for voting me as new TU recently, I hope we all have a good time together. :) A small update from my current ArchLinux work: I've been working hard to push my first package (arduino) to the community repository, but my PGP key is not signed yet and we were also discussing on how to improve the package on the TU IRC. There is probably a bug with the avr-gcc package that I need to fix first and then the package needs to be packaged different than before. In the end its getting even better hopefully. But for now I am going on holidays for about 1~3 weeks with limited/no access to my emails/internet. Its been over a year now since my last real holdiday, so I hope you all understand :) I try to at least push another arduino update on AUR which had a new release yesterday. Cheers Nico

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 23 Sep '16

23 Sep '16

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 1 new package in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 1 fully signed off package * 14 packages missing signoffs * 8 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (1 total) == * puppet-4.7.0-1 (any) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (14 total) == * puppet-4.7.0-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * bluegriffon-2.1.1-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * iscan-2.30.2-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * julius-4.4.2-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * luasec-2:0.6-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * powerdns-recursor-4.0.2-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * prosody-0.10.r7656+.296543556065+-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bluegriffon-2.1.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * evemu-2.5.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * iscan-2.30.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * julius-4.4.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * luasec-2:0.6-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * powerdns-recursor-4.0.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * prosody-0.10.r7656+.296543556065+-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Completed signoffs (1 total) == * evemu-2.5.0-1 (i686) == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (8 total) == * iscan-2.30.2-1 (x86_64), since 2016-07-10 * iscan-2.30.2-1 (i686), since 2016-07-10 * luasec-2:0.6-1 (i686), since 2016-07-14 * luasec-2:0.6-1 (x86_64), since 2016-07-14 * powerdns-recursor-4.0.2-1 (i686), since 2016-08-30 * powerdns-recursor-4.0.2-1 (x86_64), since 2016-08-30 * prosody-0.10.r7656+.296543556065+-1 (i686), since 2016-09-05 * prosody-0.10.r7656+.296543556065+-1 (x86_64), since 2016-09-05 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. pierre - 2 signoffs 2. anthraxx - 1 signoffs 3. halosghost - 1 signoffs 4. qguv - 1 signoffs 5. indrajitr - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 22 Sep '16

22 Sep '16

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 1 fully signed off package * 13 packages missing signoffs * 8 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (13 total) == * bluegriffon-2.1.1-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * iscan-2.30.2-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * julius-4.4.2-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * luasec-2:0.6-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * powerdns-recursor-4.0.2-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * prosody-0.10.r7656+.296543556065+-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bluegriffon-2.1.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * evemu-2.5.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * iscan-2.30.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * julius-4.4.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * luasec-2:0.6-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * powerdns-recursor-4.0.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * prosody-0.10.r7656+.296543556065+-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Completed signoffs (1 total) == * evemu-2.5.0-1 (i686) == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (8 total) == * iscan-2.30.2-1 (x86_64), since 2016-07-10 * iscan-2.30.2-1 (i686), since 2016-07-10 * luasec-2:0.6-1 (i686), since 2016-07-14 * luasec-2:0.6-1 (x86_64), since 2016-07-14 * powerdns-recursor-4.0.2-1 (i686), since 2016-08-30 * powerdns-recursor-4.0.2-1 (x86_64), since 2016-08-30 * prosody-0.10.r7656+.296543556065+-1 (i686), since 2016-09-05 * prosody-0.10.r7656+.296543556065+-1 (x86_64), since 2016-09-05 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. grazzolini - 1 signoffs 2. xaver - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Handling of virtual packages
by buckket 21 Sep '16

21 Sep '16

Hey, I’m currently maintaining serval packages on the AUR which are all implementations of djb’s redo[0], an incremental build system. However there are minor differences between all those implementations, and as djb never wrote one himself there is no "offical" one. That’s why I decided to give the packages unique names like "redo-sh"[1] and let them all provide[2] "redo" in their PKGBUILD. Coming from Debian I’m familiar with the concept of virtual packages[3] like www-browser[4], which makes it easy do specify a general dependency without getting to specific about it. As there some programs out there which use redo’s .do files in their building process it’s important that they can specify redo, or any of the existing implementations in their makedepends. But as far as I know there is no way to specify either package A OR B as a dependency for package C, so I came to the conclusion that using such a virtual package would make perfect sense and is the only valid option here. I already saw that "sh" is used like this, but I found no official resources on how Arch or the AUR handles such cases. Also someone just recently created a "redo" package which is in fact just one of the many implementations, which I find kinda problematic. Especially if somebody doesn’t know about the current status of the redo ecosystem. So if anybody knows about the modus operandi in such cases I’d be glad to hear about it. Regards, Felix [0] http://cr.yp.to/redo.html [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/redo-sh [2] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/PKGBUILD#provides [3] https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-binary.html#s-virtual_pkg [4] https://packages.debian.org/jessie/www-browser

4 3

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 21 Sep '16

21 Sep '16

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 5 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 1 fully signed off package * 20 packages missing signoffs * 8 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (5 total) == * aws-cli-1.10.65-1 (any) * python-botocore-1.4.55-1 (any) * python-s3transfer-0.1.4-1 (any) * mgba-0.5.0-1 (i686) * mgba-0.5.0-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (20 total) == * aws-cli-1.10.65-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-botocore-1.4.55-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-s3transfer-0.1.4-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * bluegriffon-2.1.1-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * iscan-2.30.2-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * julius-4.4.2-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libircclient-1.9-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * luasec-2:0.6-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mgba-0.5.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * powerdns-recursor-4.0.2-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * prosody-0.10.r7656+.296543556065+-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bluegriffon-2.1.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * evemu-2.5.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * iscan-2.30.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * julius-4.4.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libircclient-1.9-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * luasec-2:0.6-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * mgba-0.5.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * powerdns-recursor-4.0.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * prosody-0.10.r7656+.296543556065+-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Completed signoffs (1 total) == * evemu-2.5.0-1 (i686) == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (8 total) == * iscan-2.30.2-1 (x86_64), since 2016-07-10 * iscan-2.30.2-1 (i686), since 2016-07-10 * luasec-2:0.6-1 (i686), since 2016-07-14 * luasec-2:0.6-1 (x86_64), since 2016-07-14 * powerdns-recursor-4.0.2-1 (i686), since 2016-08-30 * powerdns-recursor-4.0.2-1 (x86_64), since 2016-08-30 * prosody-0.10.r7656+.296543556065+-1 (i686), since 2016-09-05 * prosody-0.10.r7656+.296543556065+-1 (x86_64), since 2016-09-05 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. lcarlier - 4 signoffs 2. grazzolini - 3 signoffs 3. jasonwryan - 2 signoffs 4. Irishluck83 - 1 signoffs 5. polyzen - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 20 Sep '16

20 Sep '16

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 1 fully signed off package * 16 packages missing signoffs * 8 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (16 total) == * aws-cli-1.10.63-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * bluegriffon-2.1.1-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * iscan-2.30.2-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * julius-4.4.2-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libircclient-1.9-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * luasec-2:0.6-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * powerdns-recursor-4.0.2-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * prosody-0.10.r7656+.296543556065+-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bluegriffon-2.1.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * evemu-2.5.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * iscan-2.30.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * julius-4.4.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libircclient-1.9-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * luasec-2:0.6-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * powerdns-recursor-4.0.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * prosody-0.10.r7656+.296543556065+-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Completed signoffs (1 total) == * evemu-2.5.0-1 (i686) == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (8 total) == * iscan-2.30.2-1 (x86_64), since 2016-07-10 * iscan-2.30.2-1 (i686), since 2016-07-10 * luasec-2:0.6-1 (i686), since 2016-07-14 * luasec-2:0.6-1 (x86_64), since 2016-07-14 * powerdns-recursor-4.0.2-1 (i686), since 2016-08-30 * powerdns-recursor-4.0.2-1 (x86_64), since 2016-08-30 * prosody-0.10.r7656+.296543556065+-1 (i686), since 2016-09-05 * prosody-0.10.r7656+.296543556065+-1 (x86_64), since 2016-09-05 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. qguv - 7 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Can some TU remove iep package which has been renamed upstream to pyzo
by Hector Martinez-Seara 19 Sep '16

19 Sep '16

Hi, the package I maintain in AUR iep [1] has been renamed upstream to pyzo. I have created a new pyzo package [2] and it is time to remove the old iep. Can please some TU do it? Thanks, Hector [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/iep [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pyzo -- Hector Martínez-Seara Monné mail: hseara(a)gmail.com Tel: +420775096757 Tel: +358442709253

3 2

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 19 Sep '16

19 Sep '16

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 17 packages missing signoffs * 6 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * evemu-2.5.0-1 (i686) * evemu-2.5.0-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (17 total) == * aws-cli-1.10.63-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * bluegriffon-2.1.1-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * evemu-2.5.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * iscan-2.30.2-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * julius-4.4.2-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libircclient-1.9-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * luasec-2:0.6-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * powerdns-recursor-4.0.2-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * prosody-0.10.r7656+.296543556065+-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bluegriffon-2.1.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * evemu-2.5.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * iscan-2.30.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * julius-4.4.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libircclient-1.9-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * luasec-2:0.6-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * powerdns-recursor-4.0.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * prosody-0.10.r7656+.296543556065+-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (6 total) == * iscan-2.30.2-1 (x86_64), since 2016-07-10 * iscan-2.30.2-1 (i686), since 2016-07-10 * luasec-2:0.6-1 (i686), since 2016-07-14 * luasec-2:0.6-1 (x86_64), since 2016-07-14 * powerdns-recursor-4.0.2-1 (i686), since 2016-08-30 * powerdns-recursor-4.0.2-1 (x86_64), since 2016-08-30 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. basica - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] amdgpu-pro : video playback hangs system
by SET 18 Sep '16

18 Sep '16

Hello, I just can't play any video file with amdgpu-pro, with any DE, any video file format and any player. The system totally freezes on playback start and there's no choice but a hard reboot. There are no problems with a 3D application I use (Slicer) though performance is less than with fglrx. My laptop : Linux hp2.domain 4.7.4-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Thu Sep 15 15:24:29 CEST 2016 x86_64 GNU/Linux 00:01.0 VGA compatible controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Kaveri [Radeon R6 Graphics] 01:00.0 Display controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Topaz XT [Radeon R7 M260/M265 / M340/M360] (rev ff) X.Org X Server 1.18.4 Here is my Xorg.log : http://pastebin.com/WeY7X2De amdgpu_test : the first time, the system froze on 'VCE tests'. Next run would stop with these results : http://pastebin.com/g2jF423b I wish to know if it's a common known problem with some tweaks to get it work (play videos). Or if's an upstream amdgpu-pro/Xorg problem where I just have to wait and try a next release. Thanks for any input.

1 0