January 2022 - Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] TU application for sudoforge
by Ben Denhartog 23 Mar '22

23 Mar '22

Hello good people and fellow miscreants, My name is Benjamin Denhartog, better known as sudoforge [0], and I'd like to formally submit an application to become a TU. I've maintained a few AUR packages for a while now [1], and you've probably seen me around and about in IRC (_mostly_ `#archlinux-offtopic` these days). Both Felix Yan (felixonmars) and Morten Linderud (Foxboron) have agreed to sponsor my application. I've been in, on, and around computers for my entire life (thanks fam), and have been involved in the open source community from the moment I started learning to program in the early 2000s. I currently work in the "DevOps" space, focusing on developer tooling, workflow automation, and all of the ancillary things that come with that, like infrastructure-as-code, CI/CD, observability and remediation. I enjoy mentoring less experienced engineers (and people brand new to technology alike), having been a part of mentorship and educational programs both at work and in the public (via Meetup). Outside of things related to computers, I enjoy snowboarding, cooking, and trying to take halfway-decent pictures. I currently live in the Rocky Mountains, somewhere around 3050m (9150ft) elevation, where the oxygen is a bit thinner, just like the crowds (except for the tourist-heavy days). Below are some of the things I pledge to do as a TU. # AUR packages that I'll move to community - bazelisk - buildozer - copybara (`copybara-git`) - firebase-tools - google-appengine-go - google-cloud-sdk - google-cloud-sdk-app-datastore-emulator - google-cloud-sdk-app-engine-java - google-cloud-sdk-app-engine-python - google-cloud-sdk-app-engine-python-extras - kind (`kind-bin`) - ledger-live - ledger-udev - lf Additionally, I'll be packaging the rest of the `google-cloud-sdk` plugins which are not yet packaged, and I'd love to help co-maintain or adopt Rust or Golang packages, and anything else that strikes my fancy along the way. # A non-exhaustive list of packages I use and would love to co-maintain - alacritty - bat - bazel - bottom - buildah - container-diff - crictl - critest - go - gopass - kubectl - kubectx - ledger - neomutt - packer - podman - restic - ripgrep - rtorrent - rust - rust-analyzer - rustup - signal-desktop - unbound - vault - zsa-wally-cli # Miscellaneous things I want to do - Take a look at the TU and maintainer workflows, and automate what can be automated (e.g. onboarding), with the goal of simplifying management of the Arch Linux ecosystem - Help out with infrastructure maintenance and other operational tasks - Make a billion dollars and never have to work again, so I can spend my time traveling and working on open source projects Thanks for taking the time to read this (or at least, quickly scan over the above wall of text). Take a break and get a coffee/tea/beer -- have a good weekend. [0]: https://aur.archlinux.org/account/sudoforge [1]: https://github.com/sudoforge/pkgbuilds All the best, sudoforge

8 21

Re: [aur-general] changing submitter?
by Thomas 15 Jan '22

15 Jan '22

Hi Ricardo, Yea that was the first thing i tried but it won't change the submitter but only maintainer and packager.. Trying to find a contact who can change that.. :( Thx Thomas > Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 19:45:24 +0100 > From: Ricardo Band <email(a)ricardo.band> > To: aur-general(a)lists.archlinux.org > Subject: Re: [aur-general] changing submitter? > Message-ID: > <2503cfda3abe17da212b80a1c8b044158e325da4.camel(a)ricardo.band> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > On Thu, 2022-01-13 at 13:22 +0100, Thomas via aur-general wrote: >> >> Is it possible to change the submitter which is shown? >> If so what do I need to do? > > You could disown the package and grap it with the other one. > > -- > Greetings > > Ricardo Band > > https:// www.ricardo.band > mailto:// email(a)ricardo.band

2 1

[aur-general] changing submitter?
by Thomas 13 Jan '22

13 Jan '22

Hi, I have 2 accounts and accidentially submitted a package with the wrong account... :( Is it possible to change the submitter which is shown? If so what do I need to do? thanks in advance Thomas

2 1

[aur-general] laptop broke, co-maintainers needed.
by zoorat 10 Jan '22

10 Jan '22

hey everyone, i was maintaining few packages for a while now... but my laptop fan broke and cant find the necessary part anywhere to fix this thing, and my family is not interested about letting me buy another one, at least not now, because i have a major exam ahead... it sucks. anyway, i want some co-maintainer who can keep those packages update to date for now, i will try to get back as soon as possible. if you want to co-maintain then please reply to this mail with your username, and i dont have any requirement but i hope your account it quite old... i will get back in few days and make you the co-maintainer, thanks a lot for helping me. btw, i dont know much about co-maintaining... tell me what i should do and shouldn't... yours, zoorat. p.s. im in rush, dont mind my bad english.

5 7

Re: [aur-general] laptop broke, co-maintainers needed.
by Amin Vakil 09 Jan '22

09 Jan '22

> if you want to co-maintain then please reply to this mail with your username, > and i dont have any requirement but i hope your account it quite old... > i will get back in few days and make you the co-maintainer, > thanks a lot for helping me. > I can help co-maintaining python-spotdl. My username is aminvakil. Best Regards, Amin Vakil

1 0

[aur-general] Request to add makedumpfile to community repo
by Guilherme G. Piccoli 07 Jan '22

07 Jan '22

Hi folks, first of all thanks for maintaining Arch Linux - it's a very great distro to use! So, I'm working in a potential kdump package for Arch - I've been working for some time in Ubuntu/Debian kdump and it was a surprise when I started to use Arch and noticed that we don't have a kdump package (or in case we have something, please let me know and apologies in advance). Anyway, kdump functionality requires some components, like kexec, makedumpfile (to collect compressed dumps - a must if you ask me) and the crash utility to analyze the core dumps (although there are more tools for that). Currently, both kexec and crash are present in the official repositories (extra and community, respectively). Makedumpfile is maintained in AUR - very well maintainer I should add, thanks to Maurizio. But I'd like to request, if possible, to bump makedumpfile to community repository - I think it makes sense to have this package in the repos along with crash and kexec, so a potential kdump package in AUR would depend only on pre-built official packages. I'd like to help making that happen - just let me know what I can do. By reading the documentation in the wikis, it seems it's a good idea to propose packages that: - have at least some votes -> makedumpfile is OK in this respect; - well-maintained in AUR -> ditto for makedumpfile; - are useful -> I consider makedumpfile very useful, I'd say essential for kdump; So, if any TU wants to adopt it, I'd be really happy and grateful. Thanks in advance, and please let me know your feedback on this request. Cheers, Guilherme

1 0

[aur-general] Stop deleting texlive-dummy and texlive-upstream
by slbtty 05 Jan '22

05 Jan '22

Hi, It is obviously the one who request and confirm the deletion of the texlive-dummy and texlive-upstream doesn't know why they are existed. The delection request this [1] : """ Dummy pkgbuild which wrongfully conflicts and replaces texlive system packages """ Exactly! We don't want to use the system texlive at all. We want the conflict and replace the system texlive. The texlive in official repo is out-dated and unable to pull other packages from CPAN. The system texlive and the dependencies on it is broken. The TeXlive installed by official installer (from texlive.org) is superior and much better for serious users, and we really don't need the system one. If you google "archlinux texlive dummy", you know what ? You can get a lot of pages about "texlive dummy package on AUR". However, the package is GONE. Stop breaking this existing, proven to work and perfect solution. Please stop deleting them! Please restore both texlive-dummy and texlive-upstream. Please check how many upvotes and popularity that those two packages got. [1] https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-requests/2022-January/064689.html https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-requests/2022-January/064789.html https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-requests/2022-January/064691.html slbtty

2 1

[aur-general] Clarification for Deletion request #30701
by silentnoodle 03 Jan '22

03 Jan '22

hey all, Today a package i co maintain (telegram-desktop-bin) was deleted because "Package exists in official community repo", but since we used prebuilt binary as source I did not think that would have applied. So guess I'd just like a word on what the first point in the rules of submission means: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/AUR_submission_guidelines#Rules_of_submiss… Cheers, Ben a.k.a silentnoodle

16 34