- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

Free DDOS Protection Tool
by shresth paul 08 Oct '25

08 Oct '25

Hello Team, I hope you're doing well. So recently we noticed that the ARCH linux is facing a lot of DDOS attacks. What if we were to use Project Galileo to avoid these DDOS? This is completely free of cost by CloudFlare. Project Galileo | Cloudflare <https://www.cloudflare.com/galileo/> Thanks Shresth Paul Website: - Shresth Paul | Cybersecurity Professional <https://secbyshresth.github.io/Portfolio/>

8 12

AUR down
by Javier 06 Oct '25

06 Oct '25

Hello ! It seem AUR [1] is down, or is it me? Thanks ! -- Javier [1] https://aur.archlinux.org

9 12

Fwd: AUR Comment for rapidyaml
by shresth paul 03 Oct '25

03 Oct '25

Hello Everyone, This has been done. Thanks Shresth Paul (UserName: SecByShresth) ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: <notify(a)aur.archlinux.org> Date: Fri, Oct 3, 2025 at 1:53 AM Subject: AUR Comment for rapidyaml To: <shresthpaul133(a)gmail.com> patlefort [1] added the following comment to rapidyaml [2]: Can you add `libryml.so` in provides for c++ package? Thanks. -- If you no longer wish to receive notifications about this package, please go to the package page [2] and select "Disable notifications". [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/patlefort/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/rapidyaml/

1 0

Re: AUR Comment for rapidyaml
by shresth paul 02 Oct '25

02 Oct '25

Hello Guys, I hope you're doing well. I just fixed this package, can we please test it out? Let me know if you still face any issues. Thanks Shresth Paul On Fri, Oct 3, 2025 at 12:35 AM <notify(a)aur.archlinux.org> wrote: > abouvier [1] added the following comment to rapidyaml [2]: > > It can't work if it doesn't even build: > ``` > ==> Starting build()... > -- The CXX compiler identification is GNU 15.2.1 > -- Detecting CXX compiler ABI info > -- Detecting CXX compiler ABI info - done > -- Check for working CXX compiler: /usr/lib/ccache/bin/c++ - skipped > -- Detecting CXX compile features > -- Detecting CXX compile features - done > -- ryml: using C++ standard: C++11 > -- ryml: setting C++ standard: 11 > -- ryml: setting C++ standard required: ON > -- ryml: importing subproject c4core (SUBDIRECTORY)... > /build/rapidyaml/src/rapidyaml/ext/c4core > -- c4core: using C++ standard: C++11 > -- ryml: -----> target ryml PUBLIC incorporating lib c4core > -- ryml: packing the project: > -- ryml: cpack tag: v0.10.0 > -- ryml: enabling API > CMake Error at > /usr/share/cmake/Modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:227 > (message): > Could NOT find SWIG (missing: SWIG_EXECUTABLE SWIG_DIR) > Call Stack (most recent call first): > /usr/share/cmake/Modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:591 > (_FPHSA_FAILURE_MESSAGE) > /usr/share/cmake/Modules/FindSWIG.cmake:184 > (find_package_handle_standard_args) > api/CMakeLists.txt:18 (find_package) > > > -- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred! > ==> ERROR: A failure occurred in build(). > ``` > > -- > If you no longer wish to receive notifications about this package, > please go to the package page [2] and select "Disable notifications". > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/abouvier/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/rapidyaml/

1 0

Packages for Adoption
by Brian 01 Oct '25

01 Oct '25

Hi AUR Community, I’m giving up all the packages I maintain for adoption. Unfortunately, I don’t have any time to maintain them in the foreseeable future. You’ll noticed that quite a few of them have Dockerfiles. This is because I was doing my development work on a Mac. The image in those Dockerfiles is a custom image that I created which publishes a new version daily (https://github.com/brianrobt/archlinux-aurdev-docker-image) That process is completely automated, but if it should ever break, then I probably won’t have time to fix it. Anyway, most of you probably wouldn’t even use it to begin with since you’re developing on Arch, but I thought it’d be useful to know. I also have a GitHub repo where I’ve been keeping copies of the files on each AUR package (https://github.com/brianrobt/aur-pkgbuilds) I setup a bit of automation to perform package updates, but it’s doesn’t work with some of the packages and isn’t really “production-ready”. It may be useful for any new maintainers. Here are the packages that I’m orphaning: - alist - simplex-chat-bin - stable-diffusion.cpp-vulkan-git - nmctl - netclient - htmlhint - pixieditor-bin - python-nspektr - openmohaa-git - openmohaa - rocm-clang-ocl - rot8-git - outwiker - arduino-avr-core - rapidyaml - python-rapidyaml - gradle-language-server - python-mouseinfo I greatly appreciated and enjoyed working with the other AUR maintainers. It was a great experience, and I hope that I can return to the community sooner rather than later. Thank you for all of the help and support! — Best regards, Brian Thompson DevOps/SRE | Open Source Developer St. Peters, MO, USA

4 3

Problem generating the telegraf package in a chroot
by Óscar García Amor 30 Sep '25

30 Sep '25

Hello folks, Let me tell you, I've been maintaining the Telegraf[1] package in AUR for some time now, and whenever I update it (or generate it), I have to do it in a container because it's not possible with the `extra-x86_64- build` command. If you look at the PKGBUILD, there is a point where the configuration is generated with the newly created binary itself. It is the last line of `build()`, `./build/telegraf config > telegraf.conf`. It is at this point that the execution stops completely if I build the package with `extra-x86_64-build`. Can you think of any reason why this might happen or how it could be fixed? This step is necessary because there is no other way to generate the base configuration. Best regards. [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/telegraf -- Óscar García Amor | ogarcia at moire.org | http://ogarcia.me

4 7

Please remove the removal request of libelectron-electron-meta
by Corey Bruce 25 Sep '25

25 Sep '25

Hi guys I have been in conversation with a someone on my AUR package who decided to request my package to.be <http://to.be> removed when it shouldn't be and was kindly ask if the removal request could be removed as it would cause a lot of problems for not only me but all the users who use my software and break things by removing this essential meta package Thank you corey

6 12

Request to adopt unlisted AUR packages
by Damian Höster 23 Sep '25

23 Sep '25

Hello, I would like to adopt the currently unlisted packages `google-gemini-nativefier` and `anthropic-claude-nativefier`. They were maintained by amaxcz until few weeks ago, `openai-chatgpt-nativefier` still is. I had used those packages for quite a long time, and recently noticed that they had vanished from the AUR, only the repositories remained. I already modified the PKGBUILDs to my liking. Not sure if this is the right place to go to, but I couldn't find any information on what to do in such a situation from the Arch Wiki. My username is damian101 on the AUR as well. Kind regards damian101

3 2

What is the business behind many sandboxing package being deleted?
by concierge9156 23 Sep '25

23 Sep '25

Hi community, I’m an ordinary user who relies on the sandboxing packages from the AUR. To my surprise, a large number of these packages have been removed and the maintainer now points us to a separate PKGBUILD repository. According to the AUR submission guidelines , the AUR (and official repos) are meant for “packages which install general software and software‑related content, including … configuration file(s).” Sandbox packages are precisely configuration files that provide unique, valuable features for many users. When I asked the maintainer on Matrix for an explanation, she replied simply: “Are you having the false sensation of AUR being free? I had that mistake before.” The wholesale deletion of these packages undermines the sandboxing community’s efforts and leaves countless users without essential tools. I request a clear, reasoned justification for this action and a reconsideration of the policy’s application to sandbox packages. Thank you. concierge9156

5 4

Help with Creating an AUR Account
by Muneo 17 Sep '25

17 Sep '25

Hello, I encountered an issue while creating an AUR account. Where should I direct my inquiry in such cases?

2 1