Recently, I have made great change and updated frequently. Now it is svn-r70. AUR is svn-r25, which is unstable and lack of many new features. In additional, wrong dependencies. Isn't be good for a software owner to maintain its AUR package? On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Ronald van Haren <pressh@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 10:54 AM, arcpp.zju@gmail.com <arcpp.zju@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi, there
I am the author of ibus-sogoupycc ( http://code.google.com/p/ibus-sogoupycc/ ).
These package are currently in AUR: 'ibus-sogoupycc' and 'ibus-sogoupycc-svn' and are seriously outdated, currently maintained by another person.
I tried to notify that person by email, but no response for several days.
Please orphan these packages, so I can maintain these packages.
Links: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32200 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31920
Thanks.
seriously, ibus-sogoupycc-svn 25-1 is last updated 25th of February this year?
Ronald