On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 at 22:35, Oscar <spacepluk@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm currently maintaining unity-editor and unityhub and I don't think they will allow redistribution of binaries.
They even dropped the official Ubuntu packages in favor of their custom installers. And honestly it makes more sense to do it this way because the engine is a big self contained blob and users usually need to have several different versions installed at the same time to patch old projects etc.
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019, 22:20 Sven-Hendrik Haase via aur-general < aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019, 22:06 Balló György via aur-general < aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
2019. 08. 16, péntek keltezéssel 15.19-kor Jean Lucas via aur-general ezt írta:
If I were accepted to become a TU, I'd like to adopt and move the following packages (all having over 10 votes in the AUR) from the AUR into [community]:
anydesk, downgrade, exercism, flutter, godot, itch, mattermost- desktop, nvm, reaper, spotify, teamviewer, thermald, unity-editor, and unityhub, for starters!
anydesk, reaper, spotify, teamviewer, unity-editor and unityhub are proprietary software with restrictive license. I don't think that you can legally distribute them.
-- György Balló Trusted User
Well, you can always ask upstream. So far, we received exceptions for redistribution of more software than we got rejections for, I think.
Never hurts to ask. :) Asking should also be done in the case of all the packages Jean mentioned.