11 Aug
2010
11 Aug
'10
10:44 p.m.
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 16:04 +0200, Peter Simons wrote:
Well, when a Haskell package is obviously out-of-date on AUR and someone offers to take over maintenance, then disown it and let that person handle the package. That's the way it's done for everything else, and the procedure seems to work fine. It's a mystery to me why the ArchLinux team deviated from that procedure for Haskell packages in the first place.
Take care, Peter
Wasn't there a Haskell update script that automatically did the updating?