On 11/13/2016 03:33 AM, Det via aur-general wrote:
Why helloooooooooooooooooooo,
Since the maintainer is throwing his tantrum, I decided it would be good to ask the mailing list directly, should "pepper-flash" [1] be renamed to e.g. "flashplugin-ppapi"?
This would be more in line with the official package extra/flashplugin [2] and also the source URL of the thing itself.
What do you think?
[1] = https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pepper-flash/
[2] = https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/flashplugin/
Det
So, in the mailing list you give your actual reasoning, *after* giving a cryptic comment in the AUR comments and being rejected, and rightly so, as a crank. And now you will sling mud at the pepper-flash maintainer. I have no opinion about the package itself (I certainly do not see the apparent obviousness of your position), but purely regarding your behavior, I desperately want you to remain unhappy. -- Eli Schwartz