On April 4, 2018 4:49 PM, Robin Broda via aur-general <aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote:
On 04/04/2018 04:37 PM, Jordan Glover wrote:
The point is that the community package which doesn't build manually and
point to nonexistent sources is the one which should be deleted instead of
the one from AUR. If you prefer that upstream Archlinux instructions will look
the same as those for Ubuntu/Debian[*] then it will be done but it would mean
that Archlinux project in current form is a joke and you role in it isn't worth a
dime.
The package in [community] will be updated soon.
Jordan
Regards, Rob
I'm sorry for the harsh words. If those requests were made AFTER update package in repo there won't be this conversation. I found situation where killing other people efforts to make things work, unacceptable without providing an alternative. Common sense should prevail the rules. Jordan