2010/12/4 Laurent Carlier <lordheavym@gmail.com>:
Le samedi 4 décembre 2010 23:58:33, Ionuț Bîru a écrit :
hi, because of my lack of understanding of bylaws and failing to comply with them on my first proposal, i like to take the chance and redo the proposal, following letter by letter the removing procedure.
Conform bylaws a motion procedure should be sent on aur-general with reasons.
Here are my reasons:
1) i noticed in January he doesn't have an account on our devel panel, i asked him to send all the infos to get one and he replied that he doesn't need one because none of his packages are suitable for community. Replying to his email i encourage to get one and adopt some packages from community. At that time we have ~700 orphans and i haven't got any replies from him.
2) no commits in community since the addition.
3) he's not marked as inactive and conform bylaws this deviates from the "above", above being, 5 days discussion period + 7 voting. Because of that i'm starting a 3 days discussion period and 5 days voting.
Please discuss the motion(really discuss and not like in previous,couples of hours and the next days arguing about bylaws)
Ranguvar can defend himself.
I'm the second TU for the removal procedure for Ranguvar
Laurent Carlier
I should be the first one, but let's be the third this time. -- Angel Velásquez angvp @ irc.freenode.net Arch Linux Developer / Trusted User Linux Counter: #359909 http://www.angvp.com