Re: [aur-general] Plans for packages in community

On BBS there was a discussion about having the documentation of the TeXlive packages available in some repo. I don't really have an opinion on this.

What are the plans about having a repo for architecture independent packages?

I don't know of any such plans. Pretty sure there are none. I like the idea though, it makes sense.

Aonther question: there is a package named sage-mathematics in the AUR. It has been orphaned, so I updated it. Should this go to community? I don't have much of an informed opinion, but my gut says it would be a bad idea. I seem to recall that the arch servers don't have a ton of disk space, and that would be a rather large bandwidth drain in addition. I'm against this one at least.