Okay, so these should be removed: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linux-zfs/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/zfs-linux-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/zfs-behlendorf-git/ Felix, could you do that please?
The dkms packages are definitely not maintained, but useful none the less as eventually someone would probably like to build ZFSonLinux with DKMS. I don't think they are named properly though. If they can be transferred to my user "demizer" in AUR, I would be happy to eventually provide proper packages as part of the ZFS support for Arch. If we agree to a maintainer transfer, could the packages please be renamed to:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/zfs-modules-dkms/ renamed to zfs-dkms
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/spl-modules-dkms/ renamed to spl-dkms
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/zfs-tools/ renamed to zfs-utils-dkms
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/spl-tools/ renamed to spl-utils-dkms
"Renaming" is just creating a new package and "merging" the old one into new one to transfer votes and comments. But you can't just do that, since zfs-dkms already exists in the repo. ;-) Having that in mind, zfs-modules-dkms is rendered useless and should be deleted, right? By the way, I just spotted yet another zfs dkms package, can you confirm this one should be deleted too? This looks like a fork of your package, "# Maintainer: Jesus Alvarez <jeezusjr at gmail dot com>" is in there... https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/zfs-dkms-therp/ + all zfs and spl packages from here https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?K=therp&SeB=m Regarding the existing zfs-dkms, you take over the package after you contact a maintainer and the maintainer doesn't respond in 2 weeks (or just agrees and disowns). I'd strongly encourage you to do so because it would be good to have zfs packages clean and usable in AUR. :) There are really too much results for `yaourt -Ss zfs`, most of which are unusable. -- Kind regards, Damian Nowak StratusHost www.AtlasHost.eu